国家综合评估后关键生物多样性区域网络的变化。

IF 5.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Andrew J Plumptre, Zoltan Waliczky, Daniele Baisero, Olivia Crowe, Jeannot Kivono, Cecilia Tobar, Maria Gabriela Toscano, Natalia Boulad, Hugo Costa, Camila Davila, Sophie Dirou, Eleuterio Duarte, Karolina Fierro, Carolina Castellanos-Castro, Hanna Haddad, Stephen Holness, Fiona Maisels, Daniel Marnewick, Menard Mbende, Maitha Abdulla Al Mheiri, Dissondet Moundzoho, Simon Nampindo, Grace Nangendo, Steeve Ngama, Catherine Numa, Diego Peñaranda, Samridhi Rijal, Manuel Sánchez-Nivicela, Andrew Skowno, Thomas Starnes, Nicolas Texier, Lize von Staden, Anne Bowser, Thomas M Brooks, Gill Bunting, Stuart H M Butchart, Neil Cox, Wendy Elliot, Jo Gilbert, Penny Langhammer, Olivier Langrand, Rachel Neugarten, Madhu Rao, Jon Paul Rodriguez, Gina Della Togna, Amy Upgren, Stephen Woodley
{"title":"国家综合评估后关键生物多样性区域网络的变化。","authors":"Andrew J Plumptre, Zoltan Waliczky, Daniele Baisero, Olivia Crowe, Jeannot Kivono, Cecilia Tobar, Maria Gabriela Toscano, Natalia Boulad, Hugo Costa, Camila Davila, Sophie Dirou, Eleuterio Duarte, Karolina Fierro, Carolina Castellanos-Castro, Hanna Haddad, Stephen Holness, Fiona Maisels, Daniel Marnewick, Menard Mbende, Maitha Abdulla Al Mheiri, Dissondet Moundzoho, Simon Nampindo, Grace Nangendo, Steeve Ngama, Catherine Numa, Diego Peñaranda, Samridhi Rijal, Manuel Sánchez-Nivicela, Andrew Skowno, Thomas Starnes, Nicolas Texier, Lize von Staden, Anne Bowser, Thomas M Brooks, Gill Bunting, Stuart H M Butchart, Neil Cox, Wendy Elliot, Jo Gilbert, Penny Langhammer, Olivier Langrand, Rachel Neugarten, Madhu Rao, Jon Paul Rodriguez, Gina Della Togna, Amy Upgren, Stephen Woodley","doi":"10.1111/cobi.70151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are sites of significance for the global persistence of biodiversity. Based on the Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA Standard), published in 2016, sites are currently being assessed for KBA designation in a growing number of countries across the world. For these assessments, the KBA criteria are applied to all species and ecosystems with available data. We reviewed the first comprehensive assessments of 11 countries and compared the KBA network before and after assessments. The mean (SD) number of KBAs per country increased by 69.6% (102.1), and the mean total extent of KBAs per country increased by 164.2% (150.7). More than half of the KBAs in 2024 had >50% of their area outside the 2019 KBAs, indicating a substantial increase in KBA extent (54.0% [18.8] of KBAs). The mean proportion of each KBA covered by protected or conserved areas decreased from 56.2% (20.2) to 44.5% (15.5), owing to the incorporation of unprotected sites in the KBA network. On average, 41.1% (14.0) of sites in each country (mean 44.5 [46.4] sites per country) and 47.2% (20.5) of new KBA area after the assessment were completely unprotected, indicating that many of the new sites were not recognized in national protected area networks as significant for biodiversity before the assessment. Making a comprehensive assessment of KBAs increased the combined coverage of protected and conserved area networks from 25.4% (10.6) to 32.0% (13.1) in each country and thus contributed to reducing biodiversity loss. Therefore, comprehensive assessments of KBAs led to a substantially increased number and extent of recognized sites of importance for biodiversity published in the World Database of KBAs. Where such assessments have not been made, many important areas for biodiversity may be overlooked. We therefore encourage other nations to update their KBA networks to inform efforts to meet the goals and targets of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":" ","pages":"e70151"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Key Biodiversity Area networks following national comprehensive assessments.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J Plumptre, Zoltan Waliczky, Daniele Baisero, Olivia Crowe, Jeannot Kivono, Cecilia Tobar, Maria Gabriela Toscano, Natalia Boulad, Hugo Costa, Camila Davila, Sophie Dirou, Eleuterio Duarte, Karolina Fierro, Carolina Castellanos-Castro, Hanna Haddad, Stephen Holness, Fiona Maisels, Daniel Marnewick, Menard Mbende, Maitha Abdulla Al Mheiri, Dissondet Moundzoho, Simon Nampindo, Grace Nangendo, Steeve Ngama, Catherine Numa, Diego Peñaranda, Samridhi Rijal, Manuel Sánchez-Nivicela, Andrew Skowno, Thomas Starnes, Nicolas Texier, Lize von Staden, Anne Bowser, Thomas M Brooks, Gill Bunting, Stuart H M Butchart, Neil Cox, Wendy Elliot, Jo Gilbert, Penny Langhammer, Olivier Langrand, Rachel Neugarten, Madhu Rao, Jon Paul Rodriguez, Gina Della Togna, Amy Upgren, Stephen Woodley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cobi.70151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are sites of significance for the global persistence of biodiversity. Based on the Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA Standard), published in 2016, sites are currently being assessed for KBA designation in a growing number of countries across the world. For these assessments, the KBA criteria are applied to all species and ecosystems with available data. We reviewed the first comprehensive assessments of 11 countries and compared the KBA network before and after assessments. The mean (SD) number of KBAs per country increased by 69.6% (102.1), and the mean total extent of KBAs per country increased by 164.2% (150.7). More than half of the KBAs in 2024 had >50% of their area outside the 2019 KBAs, indicating a substantial increase in KBA extent (54.0% [18.8] of KBAs). The mean proportion of each KBA covered by protected or conserved areas decreased from 56.2% (20.2) to 44.5% (15.5), owing to the incorporation of unprotected sites in the KBA network. On average, 41.1% (14.0) of sites in each country (mean 44.5 [46.4] sites per country) and 47.2% (20.5) of new KBA area after the assessment were completely unprotected, indicating that many of the new sites were not recognized in national protected area networks as significant for biodiversity before the assessment. Making a comprehensive assessment of KBAs increased the combined coverage of protected and conserved area networks from 25.4% (10.6) to 32.0% (13.1) in each country and thus contributed to reducing biodiversity loss. Therefore, comprehensive assessments of KBAs led to a substantially increased number and extent of recognized sites of importance for biodiversity published in the World Database of KBAs. Where such assessments have not been made, many important areas for biodiversity may be overlooked. We therefore encourage other nations to update their KBA networks to inform efforts to meet the goals and targets of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70151\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关键生物多样性区(KBAs)是对全球生物多样性持续性具有重要意义的地点。根据2016年发布的《关键生物多样性区识别全球标准》(KBA标准),世界上越来越多的国家正在对这些地点进行KBA指定评估。对于这些评估,KBA标准适用于所有有可用数据的物种和生态系统。我们回顾了11个国家的首次综合评估,并比较了评估前后的KBA网络。各国KBAs的平均(SD)数量增加了69.6%(102.1),各国KBAs的平均总范围增加了164.2%(150.7)。2024年,超过一半的KBA在2019年的KBA之外有50%的面积,表明KBA范围大幅增加(54.0%[18.8])。受保护或自然保育区覆盖的平均比例由56.2%(20.2%)下降至44.5%(15.5%),主要原因是在区内纳入了未受保护的地点。在评估后,每个国家平均有41.1%(14.0)的站点(平均44.5[46.4]个站点)和47.2%(20.5)的新KBA区域完全不受保护,这表明许多新站点在评估前未被国家保护区网络认可为具有重要生物多样性。通过对KBAs进行综合评估,每个国家的保护区和保护区网络的总覆盖率从25.4%(10.6%)增加到32.0%(13.1%),从而有助于减少生物多样性的丧失。因此,通过对生物多样性要地的综合评价,世界生物多样性要地数据库中被认可的生物多样性要地的数量和范围大大增加。如果没有进行这样的评估,许多重要的生物多样性领域可能会被忽视。因此,我们鼓励其他国家更新其KBA网络,为实现《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》的目标和指标提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in Key Biodiversity Area networks following national comprehensive assessments.

Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are sites of significance for the global persistence of biodiversity. Based on the Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA Standard), published in 2016, sites are currently being assessed for KBA designation in a growing number of countries across the world. For these assessments, the KBA criteria are applied to all species and ecosystems with available data. We reviewed the first comprehensive assessments of 11 countries and compared the KBA network before and after assessments. The mean (SD) number of KBAs per country increased by 69.6% (102.1), and the mean total extent of KBAs per country increased by 164.2% (150.7). More than half of the KBAs in 2024 had >50% of their area outside the 2019 KBAs, indicating a substantial increase in KBA extent (54.0% [18.8] of KBAs). The mean proportion of each KBA covered by protected or conserved areas decreased from 56.2% (20.2) to 44.5% (15.5), owing to the incorporation of unprotected sites in the KBA network. On average, 41.1% (14.0) of sites in each country (mean 44.5 [46.4] sites per country) and 47.2% (20.5) of new KBA area after the assessment were completely unprotected, indicating that many of the new sites were not recognized in national protected area networks as significant for biodiversity before the assessment. Making a comprehensive assessment of KBAs increased the combined coverage of protected and conserved area networks from 25.4% (10.6) to 32.0% (13.1) in each country and thus contributed to reducing biodiversity loss. Therefore, comprehensive assessments of KBAs led to a substantially increased number and extent of recognized sites of importance for biodiversity published in the World Database of KBAs. Where such assessments have not been made, many important areas for biodiversity may be overlooked. We therefore encourage other nations to update their KBA networks to inform efforts to meet the goals and targets of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信