Kyoko Asazawa, Mina Jitsuzaki, Akiko Mori, Tomohiko Ichikawa
{"title":"男性辅助生殖技术患者的决策冲突:一项定性研究。","authors":"Kyoko Asazawa, Mina Jitsuzaki, Akiko Mori, Tomohiko Ichikawa","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07493-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to clarify the decisional conflicts of men undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). We used a qualitative descriptive research design. The participants were 10 men who had received ART. Data were collected from June to August 2023 by conducting semistructured interviews using a guide. The inclusion criteria were male patients who have experienced various infertility treatments and are currently receiving ART and within 5 years of their infertility treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants were 10 men undergoing outpatient infertility treatment at two infertility treatment facilities in Tokyo. Four categories of decisional conflicts were extracted: \"Uncertainty whether ART is the best treatment\", \"Lack of clarity as to what is the most important considering the risks and benefits of ART\", \"No information on the benefits and risks of ART to decide whether to continue or terminate ART\", and \"Insufficient information on other male infertile patients' therapeutic decisions\". Men undergoing ART experienced different decisional conflicts as specified above. Identification of the main categories and subcategories of these decisional conflicts may be useful for the future development of decision-making support for men undergoing ART.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"407"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decisional conflicts of male patients undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Kyoko Asazawa, Mina Jitsuzaki, Akiko Mori, Tomohiko Ichikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13104-025-07493-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to clarify the decisional conflicts of men undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). We used a qualitative descriptive research design. The participants were 10 men who had received ART. Data were collected from June to August 2023 by conducting semistructured interviews using a guide. The inclusion criteria were male patients who have experienced various infertility treatments and are currently receiving ART and within 5 years of their infertility treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants were 10 men undergoing outpatient infertility treatment at two infertility treatment facilities in Tokyo. Four categories of decisional conflicts were extracted: \\\"Uncertainty whether ART is the best treatment\\\", \\\"Lack of clarity as to what is the most important considering the risks and benefits of ART\\\", \\\"No information on the benefits and risks of ART to decide whether to continue or terminate ART\\\", and \\\"Insufficient information on other male infertile patients' therapeutic decisions\\\". Men undergoing ART experienced different decisional conflicts as specified above. Identification of the main categories and subcategories of these decisional conflicts may be useful for the future development of decision-making support for men undergoing ART.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487044/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07493-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07493-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decisional conflicts of male patients undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: a qualitative study.
Objectives: This study aimed to clarify the decisional conflicts of men undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). We used a qualitative descriptive research design. The participants were 10 men who had received ART. Data were collected from June to August 2023 by conducting semistructured interviews using a guide. The inclusion criteria were male patients who have experienced various infertility treatments and are currently receiving ART and within 5 years of their infertility treatment.
Results: The participants were 10 men undergoing outpatient infertility treatment at two infertility treatment facilities in Tokyo. Four categories of decisional conflicts were extracted: "Uncertainty whether ART is the best treatment", "Lack of clarity as to what is the most important considering the risks and benefits of ART", "No information on the benefits and risks of ART to decide whether to continue or terminate ART", and "Insufficient information on other male infertile patients' therapeutic decisions". Men undergoing ART experienced different decisional conflicts as specified above. Identification of the main categories and subcategories of these decisional conflicts may be useful for the future development of decision-making support for men undergoing ART.
BMC Research NotesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍:
BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.