既往膝关节手术增加膝关节置换术后翻修、感染、疼痛和僵硬的风险:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Yanlun Li, Asha Ajia, Zhongna Wu, Jianhui Fan, Min Wu, Pengyu Mao, Feng Yang, Qin He, Pingxi Wang
{"title":"既往膝关节手术增加膝关节置换术后翻修、感染、疼痛和僵硬的风险:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yanlun Li, Asha Ajia, Zhongna Wu, Jianhui Fan, Min Wu, Pengyu Mao, Feng Yang, Qin He, Pingxi Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-09060-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee replacement arthroplasty(KRA), including Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), is the primary method for treating end-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, a history of previous knee surgeries (such as knee arthroscopy, ligament reconstruction, meniscectomy, high tibial osteotomy, etc.) may potentially affect functional recovery and complication risks after knee replacement. Although some studies have proposed such associations, the existing evidence remains controversial, and there is a lack of systematic quantitative analysis. This study aims to assess the impact of previous knee surgery on functional outcomes and complications following KRA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA Guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to August 4, 2024, for relevant studies. Demographic data, postoperative complications, and functional changes after primary KRA were evaluated in patients with and without a history of previous knee surgery. Statistical analysis of the included studies was performed using Stata 15.1 software. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included 28 studies with 703,103 patients (35,535 with a history of previous knee surgery and 667,568 primary KRA patients). Compared to the primary knee surgery group, the previous knee surgery group had significantly higher rates of prosthetic aseptic revision (RR(95%CI) = 1.45 (1.18-1.78)) (relative risk, RR; Confidence Interval, CI), infection (RR(95%CI) = 1.36 (1.11-1.67)), knee stiffness (RR(95%CI) = 1.73 (1.02-2.96)), and knee pain (RR(95%CI) = 1.21 (1.08-1.34)). However, there were no significant differences in changes in Knee Society Score (KSS) function (WMD(95%CI) = -0.51 (-1.73 to 0.72)) (weighted mean difference, WMD), KSS pain score (WMD(95%CI) = 0.41 (-2.97 to 3.79)), or other knee function scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with a history of previous knee surgery have a higher likelihood of prosthetic revision, a greater risk of surgical site infections or periprosthetic infections, and a significantly higher incidence of knee stiffness and knee pain following KRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"869"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Previous knee surgery increases risks of revision, infection, pain and stiffness after knee replacement arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yanlun Li, Asha Ajia, Zhongna Wu, Jianhui Fan, Min Wu, Pengyu Mao, Feng Yang, Qin He, Pingxi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-025-09060-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee replacement arthroplasty(KRA), including Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), is the primary method for treating end-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, a history of previous knee surgeries (such as knee arthroscopy, ligament reconstruction, meniscectomy, high tibial osteotomy, etc.) may potentially affect functional recovery and complication risks after knee replacement. Although some studies have proposed such associations, the existing evidence remains controversial, and there is a lack of systematic quantitative analysis. This study aims to assess the impact of previous knee surgery on functional outcomes and complications following KRA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA Guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to August 4, 2024, for relevant studies. Demographic data, postoperative complications, and functional changes after primary KRA were evaluated in patients with and without a history of previous knee surgery. Statistical analysis of the included studies was performed using Stata 15.1 software. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included 28 studies with 703,103 patients (35,535 with a history of previous knee surgery and 667,568 primary KRA patients). Compared to the primary knee surgery group, the previous knee surgery group had significantly higher rates of prosthetic aseptic revision (RR(95%CI) = 1.45 (1.18-1.78)) (relative risk, RR; Confidence Interval, CI), infection (RR(95%CI) = 1.36 (1.11-1.67)), knee stiffness (RR(95%CI) = 1.73 (1.02-2.96)), and knee pain (RR(95%CI) = 1.21 (1.08-1.34)). However, there were no significant differences in changes in Knee Society Score (KSS) function (WMD(95%CI) = -0.51 (-1.73 to 0.72)) (weighted mean difference, WMD), KSS pain score (WMD(95%CI) = 0.41 (-2.97 to 3.79)), or other knee function scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with a history of previous knee surgery have a higher likelihood of prosthetic revision, a greater risk of surgical site infections or periprosthetic infections, and a significantly higher incidence of knee stiffness and knee pain following KRA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"869\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486494/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09060-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09060-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:膝关节置换术(KRA),包括全膝关节置换术(TKA)和单室膝关节置换术(UKA),是治疗终末期膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)的主要方法。然而,既往膝关节手术史(如膝关节镜、韧带重建、半月板切除术、胫骨高位截骨术等)可能会影响膝关节置换术后的功能恢复和并发症风险。虽然一些研究提出了这种关联,但现有证据仍存在争议,缺乏系统的定量分析。本研究旨在评估既往膝关节手术对KRA术后功能结局和并发症的影响。方法:按照PRISMA指南,系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库,检索截止到2024年8月4日的相关研究。在有和没有膝关节手术史的患者中评估原发性KRA后的人口统计数据、术后并发症和功能变化。采用Stata 15.1软件对纳入的研究进行统计分析。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)用于评估研究的质量。结果:该荟萃分析包括28项研究,703103例患者(35,535例既往膝关节手术史和667,568例原发性KRA患者)。与首次膝关节手术组相比,既往膝关节手术组假体无菌翻修率(RR(95%CI) = 1.45(1.18-1.78))(相对危险度,RR;置信区间,CI),感染(RR(95%CI) = 1.36(1.11-1.67)),膝关节僵硬(RR(95%CI) = 1.73(1.02-2.96)),膝关节疼痛(RR(95%CI) = 1.21(1.08-1.34))明显更高。然而,膝关节社会评分(KSS)功能(WMD(95%CI) = -0.51(-1.73至0.72))(加权平均差,WMD), KSS疼痛评分(WMD(95%CI) = 0.41(-2.97至3.79))或其他膝关节功能评分的变化无显著差异。结论:既往有膝关节手术史的患者假体翻修的可能性更高,手术部位感染或假体周围感染的风险更高,KRA后膝关节僵硬和膝关节疼痛的发生率明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Previous knee surgery increases risks of revision, infection, pain and stiffness after knee replacement arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Previous knee surgery increases risks of revision, infection, pain and stiffness after knee replacement arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Previous knee surgery increases risks of revision, infection, pain and stiffness after knee replacement arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Previous knee surgery increases risks of revision, infection, pain and stiffness after knee replacement arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Knee replacement arthroplasty(KRA), including Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), is the primary method for treating end-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, a history of previous knee surgeries (such as knee arthroscopy, ligament reconstruction, meniscectomy, high tibial osteotomy, etc.) may potentially affect functional recovery and complication risks after knee replacement. Although some studies have proposed such associations, the existing evidence remains controversial, and there is a lack of systematic quantitative analysis. This study aims to assess the impact of previous knee surgery on functional outcomes and complications following KRA.

Methods: Following the PRISMA Guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to August 4, 2024, for relevant studies. Demographic data, postoperative complications, and functional changes after primary KRA were evaluated in patients with and without a history of previous knee surgery. Statistical analysis of the included studies was performed using Stata 15.1 software. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the studies.

Results: This meta-analysis included 28 studies with 703,103 patients (35,535 with a history of previous knee surgery and 667,568 primary KRA patients). Compared to the primary knee surgery group, the previous knee surgery group had significantly higher rates of prosthetic aseptic revision (RR(95%CI) = 1.45 (1.18-1.78)) (relative risk, RR; Confidence Interval, CI), infection (RR(95%CI) = 1.36 (1.11-1.67)), knee stiffness (RR(95%CI) = 1.73 (1.02-2.96)), and knee pain (RR(95%CI) = 1.21 (1.08-1.34)). However, there were no significant differences in changes in Knee Society Score (KSS) function (WMD(95%CI) = -0.51 (-1.73 to 0.72)) (weighted mean difference, WMD), KSS pain score (WMD(95%CI) = 0.41 (-2.97 to 3.79)), or other knee function scores.

Conclusion: Patients with a history of previous knee surgery have a higher likelihood of prosthetic revision, a greater risk of surgical site infections or periprosthetic infections, and a significantly higher incidence of knee stiffness and knee pain following KRA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信