非外伤性院外骤停患者20分钟高级心脏生命支持后心肺复苏失败的预测因素横断面研究

IF 2 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2739
Thongpitak Huabbangyang, Paskorn Sritipsukho
{"title":"非外伤性院外骤停患者20分钟高级心脏生命支持后心肺复苏失败的预测因素横断面研究","authors":"Thongpitak Huabbangyang, Paskorn Sritipsukho","doi":"10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who receive advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) for 20 minutes, the decision of whether to continue or terminate resuscitation at the scene is difficult and complicated. This study aimed to develop and validate a simple and reliable clinical scoring system for identifying cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) failure at the scene after 20 minutes of ACLS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study we evaluated the adults with nontraumatic OHCA who received ACLS for 20 minutes. The independent predictors of CPR failure were identified using multivariate regression analysis and trying to develop a clinical decision rule. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for evaluating the performance of the developed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>455 patients with the mean age of 63.85 ± 19.21 years were included (65.1% male). In most cases of OHCA, the cause of cardiac arrest was respiratory (54.9%). The first cardiac rhythm recorded in 68.1% was asystole. 313 (68.79%) cases were affiliated to the failed CPR group. The independent predictive factors of CPR failure based on multivariate analysis were the first cardiac rhythm recorded (p < 0.001), unwitnessed cardiac arrest (p < 0.001), lack of pupillary response (p < 0.001), advanced airway management at the scene (p < 0.001), and administration of drugs at the scene during CPR, including amiodarone (p = 0.020) and atropine (p = 0.002). The area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.832 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.793-0.870) with 70.0% sensitivity, 82.4% specificity, 89.8% positive predictive value, 55.5% negative predictive value, 3.97 positive likelihood ratio, and 0.36 negative likelihood ratio.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using data from routine care practices by EMS personnel, we devised a simple clinical scoring system for predicting CPR failure at the scene of OHCA after 20 minutes of complete ACLS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"e67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12478631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Factors of CPR Failure After 20 Minutes of Advanced Cardiac Life Support for Non-Traumatic Out-of-Hospital Arrest Cases; a Cross-sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Thongpitak Huabbangyang, Paskorn Sritipsukho\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who receive advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) for 20 minutes, the decision of whether to continue or terminate resuscitation at the scene is difficult and complicated. This study aimed to develop and validate a simple and reliable clinical scoring system for identifying cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) failure at the scene after 20 minutes of ACLS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study we evaluated the adults with nontraumatic OHCA who received ACLS for 20 minutes. The independent predictors of CPR failure were identified using multivariate regression analysis and trying to develop a clinical decision rule. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for evaluating the performance of the developed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>455 patients with the mean age of 63.85 ± 19.21 years were included (65.1% male). In most cases of OHCA, the cause of cardiac arrest was respiratory (54.9%). The first cardiac rhythm recorded in 68.1% was asystole. 313 (68.79%) cases were affiliated to the failed CPR group. The independent predictive factors of CPR failure based on multivariate analysis were the first cardiac rhythm recorded (p < 0.001), unwitnessed cardiac arrest (p < 0.001), lack of pupillary response (p < 0.001), advanced airway management at the scene (p < 0.001), and administration of drugs at the scene during CPR, including amiodarone (p = 0.020) and atropine (p = 0.002). The area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.832 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.793-0.870) with 70.0% sensitivity, 82.4% specificity, 89.8% positive predictive value, 55.5% negative predictive value, 3.97 positive likelihood ratio, and 0.36 negative likelihood ratio.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using data from routine care practices by EMS personnel, we devised a simple clinical scoring system for predicting CPR failure at the scene of OHCA after 20 minutes of complete ACLS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"e67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12478631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者接受高级心脏生命支持(ACLS) 20分钟后,决定是否继续或终止现场复苏是困难和复杂的。本研究旨在开发和验证一种简单可靠的临床评分系统,用于在ACLS 20分钟后现场识别心肺复苏(CPR)失败。方法:在本横断面研究中,我们评估了接受ACLS治疗20分钟的非外伤性OHCA成人患者。采用多变量回归分析确定心肺复苏术失败的独立预测因素,并试图制定临床决策规则。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价模型的性能。结果:纳入455例患者,平均年龄63.85±19.21岁,其中男性占65.1%。在大多数OHCA病例中,心脏骤停的原因是呼吸(54.9%)。68.1%的患者首次记录心律为无搏性。心肺复苏术失败组313例(68.79%)。多因素分析显示,心肺复苏失败的独立预测因素为首次记录心律(p < 0.001)、未见心脏骤停(p < 0.001)、瞳孔无反应(p < 0.001)、现场先进气道管理(p < 0.001)以及心肺复苏时现场用药,包括胺碘酮(p = 0.020)和阿托品(p = 0.002)。模型的ROC曲线下面积为0.832(95%可信区间为0.793 ~ 0.870),敏感性70.0%,特异性82.4%,阳性预测值89.8%,阴性预测值55.5%,阳性似然比3.97,阴性似然比0.36。结论:利用EMS人员的常规护理实践数据,我们设计了一个简单的临床评分系统,用于预测完全ACLS后20分钟OHCA现场的CPR失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Factors of CPR Failure After 20 Minutes of Advanced Cardiac Life Support for Non-Traumatic Out-of-Hospital Arrest Cases; a Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who receive advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) for 20 minutes, the decision of whether to continue or terminate resuscitation at the scene is difficult and complicated. This study aimed to develop and validate a simple and reliable clinical scoring system for identifying cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) failure at the scene after 20 minutes of ACLS.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study we evaluated the adults with nontraumatic OHCA who received ACLS for 20 minutes. The independent predictors of CPR failure were identified using multivariate regression analysis and trying to develop a clinical decision rule. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for evaluating the performance of the developed model.

Results: 455 patients with the mean age of 63.85 ± 19.21 years were included (65.1% male). In most cases of OHCA, the cause of cardiac arrest was respiratory (54.9%). The first cardiac rhythm recorded in 68.1% was asystole. 313 (68.79%) cases were affiliated to the failed CPR group. The independent predictive factors of CPR failure based on multivariate analysis were the first cardiac rhythm recorded (p < 0.001), unwitnessed cardiac arrest (p < 0.001), lack of pupillary response (p < 0.001), advanced airway management at the scene (p < 0.001), and administration of drugs at the scene during CPR, including amiodarone (p = 0.020) and atropine (p = 0.002). The area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.832 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.793-0.870) with 70.0% sensitivity, 82.4% specificity, 89.8% positive predictive value, 55.5% negative predictive value, 3.97 positive likelihood ratio, and 0.36 negative likelihood ratio.

Conclusion: Using data from routine care practices by EMS personnel, we devised a simple clinical scoring system for predicting CPR failure at the scene of OHCA after 20 minutes of complete ACLS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信