长期服用牛蒡子的危险性。(夹竹桃科)根背水提物治疗良性前列腺增生。

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
BioMed Research International Pub Date : 2025-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/bmri/2449997
Perpetua Dagadu, Samuel Adjei, George Awuku Asare, Kwasi Bugyei, Rodger Apandago Mahamadu, Ufuoma Ohwo, Habibur Rahman
{"title":"长期服用牛蒡子的危险性。(夹竹桃科)根背水提物治疗良性前列腺增生。","authors":"Perpetua Dagadu, Samuel Adjei, George Awuku Asare, Kwasi Bugyei, Rodger Apandago Mahamadu, Ufuoma Ohwo, Habibur Rahman","doi":"10.1155/bmri/2449997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Rauwolfia vomitoria</i> has recently been reported as a promising phytomedicine for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It has a wide range of therapeutic advantages intermingled with diverse controversies of toxicities, necessitating the need to proceed on a long-term investigation to determine the safety of <i>R. vomitoria</i>. The study is aimed at determining the subchronic toxicity of <i>R. vomitoria.</i> Rats were randomised into four (4) groups, which included the normal control group (C), <i>R. vomitoria</i> root bark aqueous extract (RVRAE), low dose (LD, 10 mg/kg bwt.), medium dose (MD, 25 mg/kg bwt.) and high dose (HD, 50 mg/kg bwt.). The experimental set-up included daily administration of plant extracts for a period of 90 days. Relative organ weights, haematological and renal function revealed no significant differences across the treatment groups. However, for liver function, whilst most liver analytes remained unchanged, a significant increase in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was observed across treatment groups. <i>C</i> and LD values were <i>C</i> = 144.2 ± 29.3 and LD = 246.4 ± 66.9 (IU) (<i>p</i> = 0.008). Total bile acids (TBAs) reduced in a dose-dependent manner; <i>C</i> = 27.9 ± 7.6, LD = 19.0 ± 5.5, MD = 18.6 ± 4.3, HD = 116.8 ± 16.8 <i> μ</i>mol/L. The most prominent significant value among others occurred between the C and HD groups (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Absolute and relative organ weights of lungs decreased in a dose-dependent manner. However, only the absolute organ weight was significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with values of <i>C</i> = 2.13 ± 0.12, LD = 1.81 ± 0.05, MD = 1.77 ± 0.15, HD = 0.62 ± 0.17 g. PSA levels in the study did not show significant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, a decline was observed with the high dose group. No significant histopathological alterations were observed in the kidneys, confirming the absence of renal toxicity. However, some histoarchitecture alterations were observed in the liver and lungs, which require further investigation. The safety of the root bark extract remains doubtful, with the lungs and the liver adversely affected even at lower doses of 10 mg/kg bwt.</p>","PeriodicalId":9007,"journal":{"name":"BioMed Research International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2449997"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Danger of Long-Term Use of <i>Rauwolfia vomitoria</i> Afzel. (Apocynaceae) Aqueous Root Back Extract for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Perpetua Dagadu, Samuel Adjei, George Awuku Asare, Kwasi Bugyei, Rodger Apandago Mahamadu, Ufuoma Ohwo, Habibur Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/bmri/2449997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Rauwolfia vomitoria</i> has recently been reported as a promising phytomedicine for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It has a wide range of therapeutic advantages intermingled with diverse controversies of toxicities, necessitating the need to proceed on a long-term investigation to determine the safety of <i>R. vomitoria</i>. The study is aimed at determining the subchronic toxicity of <i>R. vomitoria.</i> Rats were randomised into four (4) groups, which included the normal control group (C), <i>R. vomitoria</i> root bark aqueous extract (RVRAE), low dose (LD, 10 mg/kg bwt.), medium dose (MD, 25 mg/kg bwt.) and high dose (HD, 50 mg/kg bwt.). The experimental set-up included daily administration of plant extracts for a period of 90 days. Relative organ weights, haematological and renal function revealed no significant differences across the treatment groups. However, for liver function, whilst most liver analytes remained unchanged, a significant increase in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was observed across treatment groups. <i>C</i> and LD values were <i>C</i> = 144.2 ± 29.3 and LD = 246.4 ± 66.9 (IU) (<i>p</i> = 0.008). Total bile acids (TBAs) reduced in a dose-dependent manner; <i>C</i> = 27.9 ± 7.6, LD = 19.0 ± 5.5, MD = 18.6 ± 4.3, HD = 116.8 ± 16.8 <i> μ</i>mol/L. The most prominent significant value among others occurred between the C and HD groups (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Absolute and relative organ weights of lungs decreased in a dose-dependent manner. However, only the absolute organ weight was significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with values of <i>C</i> = 2.13 ± 0.12, LD = 1.81 ± 0.05, MD = 1.77 ± 0.15, HD = 0.62 ± 0.17 g. PSA levels in the study did not show significant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, a decline was observed with the high dose group. No significant histopathological alterations were observed in the kidneys, confirming the absence of renal toxicity. However, some histoarchitecture alterations were observed in the liver and lungs, which require further investigation. The safety of the root bark extract remains doubtful, with the lungs and the liver adversely affected even at lower doses of 10 mg/kg bwt.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioMed Research International\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"2449997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445129/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioMed Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/bmri/2449997\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMed Research International","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/bmri/2449997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近报道了一种很有前途的治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的植物药。它具有广泛的治疗优势,但也有各种各样的毒性争议,因此需要进行长期的研究以确定吐脓毒杆菌的安全性。本研究的目的是确定呕吐鼠的亚慢性毒性。将大鼠随机分为4组,分别为正常对照组(C)、呕吐物根皮水提物(RVRAE)、低剂量组(LD, 10 mg/kg bwt)、中剂量组(MD, 25 mg/kg bwt)和高剂量组(HD, 50 mg/kg bwt)。实验设置为每天服用植物提取物,为期90天。相对器官重量、血液学和肾功能在各治疗组间无显著差异。然而,对于肝功能,虽然大多数肝脏分析物保持不变,但在各治疗组中观察到碱性磷酸酶(ALP)显著增加。C = 144.2±29.3 (IU), LD = 246.4±66.9 (IU) (p = 0.008)。总胆汁酸(TBAs)以剂量依赖性方式减少;C = 27.9±7.6,LD = 19.0±5.5,MD = 18.6±4.3,HD = 116.8±16.8 μmol/L。C组和HD组之间的差异最为显著(p = 0.004)。肺的绝对和相对器官重量呈剂量依赖性下降。但只有绝对脏器重量(C = 2.13±0.12,LD = 1.81±0.05,MD = 1.77±0.15,HD = 0.62±0.17 g)有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组间PSA水平差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。然而,高剂量组观察到下降。肾脏未观察到明显的组织病理学改变,证实没有肾毒性。然而,在肝和肺中观察到一些组织结构改变,需要进一步研究。根皮提取物的安全性仍然值得怀疑,即使在10毫克/公斤体重的较低剂量下也会对肺和肝脏产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Danger of Long-Term Use of Rauwolfia vomitoria Afzel. (Apocynaceae) Aqueous Root Back Extract for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Rauwolfia vomitoria has recently been reported as a promising phytomedicine for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It has a wide range of therapeutic advantages intermingled with diverse controversies of toxicities, necessitating the need to proceed on a long-term investigation to determine the safety of R. vomitoria. The study is aimed at determining the subchronic toxicity of R. vomitoria. Rats were randomised into four (4) groups, which included the normal control group (C), R. vomitoria root bark aqueous extract (RVRAE), low dose (LD, 10 mg/kg bwt.), medium dose (MD, 25 mg/kg bwt.) and high dose (HD, 50 mg/kg bwt.). The experimental set-up included daily administration of plant extracts for a period of 90 days. Relative organ weights, haematological and renal function revealed no significant differences across the treatment groups. However, for liver function, whilst most liver analytes remained unchanged, a significant increase in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was observed across treatment groups. C and LD values were C = 144.2 ± 29.3 and LD = 246.4 ± 66.9 (IU) (p = 0.008). Total bile acids (TBAs) reduced in a dose-dependent manner; C = 27.9 ± 7.6, LD = 19.0 ± 5.5, MD = 18.6 ± 4.3, HD = 116.8 ± 16.8  μmol/L. The most prominent significant value among others occurred between the C and HD groups (p = 0.004). Absolute and relative organ weights of lungs decreased in a dose-dependent manner. However, only the absolute organ weight was significant (p < 0.05) with values of C = 2.13 ± 0.12, LD = 1.81 ± 0.05, MD = 1.77 ± 0.15, HD = 0.62 ± 0.17 g. PSA levels in the study did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). However, a decline was observed with the high dose group. No significant histopathological alterations were observed in the kidneys, confirming the absence of renal toxicity. However, some histoarchitecture alterations were observed in the liver and lungs, which require further investigation. The safety of the root bark extract remains doubtful, with the lungs and the liver adversely affected even at lower doses of 10 mg/kg bwt.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioMed Research International
BioMed Research International BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1942
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: BioMed Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in life sciences and medicine. The journal is divided into 55 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信