美国人群维生素D缺乏与非糖尿病性视网膜病变之间的关系:2005-2008年全国健康与营养调查

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
BioMed Research International Pub Date : 2025-09-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/bmri/2828949
Chunyan Lei, Feipeng Jiang, Li Zhang, Qibo Ran, Yun Zhang, Meixia Zhang, Deokho Lee
{"title":"美国人群维生素D缺乏与非糖尿病性视网膜病变之间的关系:2005-2008年全国健康与营养调查","authors":"Chunyan Lei, Feipeng Jiang, Li Zhang, Qibo Ran, Yun Zhang, Meixia Zhang, Deokho Lee","doi":"10.1155/bmri/2828949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Retinopathy is a vascular endothelial injury disease that can occur in individuals without diabetes. The prevalence rates of nondiabetic retinopathy (NDR) vary from 6% to 13.6% among individuals. Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is common worldwide, and studies indicate that the overall prevalence rate of VDD in US adults is 41.6%. Ample evidence indicates an inconsistent relationship between VDD and diabetic retinopathy, but the association between VDD and NDR remains limited. <b>Design:</b> We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study. <b>Settings:</b> The study was conducted using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2008. <b>Participants:</b> A total of 4076 adults (52.71% female) with a mean age of 55.79 ± 11.72 years were included. <b>Primary and Secondary Outcomes:</b> The primary outcome was the association between vitamin D and NDR, while there was no secondary outcome. <b>Results:</b> Retinopathy was detected in 309 nondiabetic subjects (7.6%), while VDD was detected in 19.36% of the NDR participants. In the univariate analysis, significant associations were found between systolic blood pressure (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.04; <i>p</i> = 0.0227), physical activity group (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.78; <i>p</i> = 0.0001), and retinopathy in the nondiabetic participants. Logistic regression analysis revealed that after adjusting for other confounders, no statistically significant association between vitamin D concentration and NDR severity was found (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97; 1.06; <i>p</i> = 0.9024). Similarly, smooth curve fitting could not find any trend between the two. Moreover, these results were consistent with the results of taking vitamin D (quartile) as a categorical variable (<i>p</i> for trend was 0.8401). <b>Conclusion:</b> In the present study, serum vitamin D concentrations within the observed range were not significantly associated with NDR risk in the nondiabetic US population, indicating that vitamin D status is unlikely to be a primary determinant of subclinical microvascular pathology in nondiabetic adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":9007,"journal":{"name":"BioMed Research International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2828949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12407306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Nondiabetic Retinopathy in the American Population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2008.\",\"authors\":\"Chunyan Lei, Feipeng Jiang, Li Zhang, Qibo Ran, Yun Zhang, Meixia Zhang, Deokho Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/bmri/2828949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Retinopathy is a vascular endothelial injury disease that can occur in individuals without diabetes. The prevalence rates of nondiabetic retinopathy (NDR) vary from 6% to 13.6% among individuals. Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is common worldwide, and studies indicate that the overall prevalence rate of VDD in US adults is 41.6%. Ample evidence indicates an inconsistent relationship between VDD and diabetic retinopathy, but the association between VDD and NDR remains limited. <b>Design:</b> We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study. <b>Settings:</b> The study was conducted using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2008. <b>Participants:</b> A total of 4076 adults (52.71% female) with a mean age of 55.79 ± 11.72 years were included. <b>Primary and Secondary Outcomes:</b> The primary outcome was the association between vitamin D and NDR, while there was no secondary outcome. <b>Results:</b> Retinopathy was detected in 309 nondiabetic subjects (7.6%), while VDD was detected in 19.36% of the NDR participants. In the univariate analysis, significant associations were found between systolic blood pressure (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.04; <i>p</i> = 0.0227), physical activity group (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.78; <i>p</i> = 0.0001), and retinopathy in the nondiabetic participants. Logistic regression analysis revealed that after adjusting for other confounders, no statistically significant association between vitamin D concentration and NDR severity was found (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97; 1.06; <i>p</i> = 0.9024). Similarly, smooth curve fitting could not find any trend between the two. Moreover, these results were consistent with the results of taking vitamin D (quartile) as a categorical variable (<i>p</i> for trend was 0.8401). <b>Conclusion:</b> In the present study, serum vitamin D concentrations within the observed range were not significantly associated with NDR risk in the nondiabetic US population, indicating that vitamin D status is unlikely to be a primary determinant of subclinical microvascular pathology in nondiabetic adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioMed Research International\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"2828949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12407306/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioMed Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/bmri/2828949\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMed Research International","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/bmri/2828949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:视网膜病变是一种血管内皮损伤性疾病,可发生在没有糖尿病的个体中。非糖尿病性视网膜病变(NDR)的患病率在个体中从6%到13.6%不等。维生素D缺乏症(VDD)在世界范围内很常见,研究表明,美国成年人的VDD总体患病率为41.6%。充足的证据表明VDD和糖尿病视网膜病变之间的关系不一致,但VDD和NDR之间的联系仍然有限。设计:我们进行了一项基于人群的横断面研究。背景:这项研究使用了2005-2008年国家健康和营养检查调查的数据。参与者:共纳入成人4076人(女性52.71%),平均年龄55.79±11.72岁。主要和次要结局:主要结局是维生素D和NDR之间的关联,而没有次要结局。结果:非糖尿病受试者中有309人(7.6%)检出视网膜病变,NDR受试者中有19.36%检出VDD。在单因素分析中,收缩压与高血压之间存在显著相关性(优势比[OR]: 1.02; 95%可信区间(CI): 1.00, 1.04;p = 0.0227)、运动组(OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.78; p = 0.0001)和非糖尿病参与者的视网膜病变。Logistic回归分析显示,在调整其他混杂因素后,维生素D浓度与NDR严重程度之间无统计学意义的关联(OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97; 1.06; p = 0.9024)。同样,光滑的曲线拟合也找不到两者之间的任何趋势。此外,这些结果与以维生素D(四分位数)作为分类变量的结果一致(趋势p为0.8401)。结论:在本研究中,在观察范围内的血清维生素D浓度与非糖尿病美国人群的NDR风险没有显著相关性,表明维生素D状态不太可能是非糖尿病成人亚临床微血管病理的主要决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Nondiabetic Retinopathy in the American Population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2008.

Objectives: Retinopathy is a vascular endothelial injury disease that can occur in individuals without diabetes. The prevalence rates of nondiabetic retinopathy (NDR) vary from 6% to 13.6% among individuals. Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is common worldwide, and studies indicate that the overall prevalence rate of VDD in US adults is 41.6%. Ample evidence indicates an inconsistent relationship between VDD and diabetic retinopathy, but the association between VDD and NDR remains limited. Design: We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study. Settings: The study was conducted using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2008. Participants: A total of 4076 adults (52.71% female) with a mean age of 55.79 ± 11.72 years were included. Primary and Secondary Outcomes: The primary outcome was the association between vitamin D and NDR, while there was no secondary outcome. Results: Retinopathy was detected in 309 nondiabetic subjects (7.6%), while VDD was detected in 19.36% of the NDR participants. In the univariate analysis, significant associations were found between systolic blood pressure (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.04; p = 0.0227), physical activity group (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.78; p = 0.0001), and retinopathy in the nondiabetic participants. Logistic regression analysis revealed that after adjusting for other confounders, no statistically significant association between vitamin D concentration and NDR severity was found (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97; 1.06; p = 0.9024). Similarly, smooth curve fitting could not find any trend between the two. Moreover, these results were consistent with the results of taking vitamin D (quartile) as a categorical variable (p for trend was 0.8401). Conclusion: In the present study, serum vitamin D concentrations within the observed range were not significantly associated with NDR risk in the nondiabetic US population, indicating that vitamin D status is unlikely to be a primary determinant of subclinical microvascular pathology in nondiabetic adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioMed Research International
BioMed Research International BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1942
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: BioMed Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in life sciences and medicine. The journal is divided into 55 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信