基于机器学习的新生儿细菌性脑膜炎短期不良预后预测模型的建立

iLABMED Pub Date : 2025-08-10 DOI:10.1002/ila2.70030
Ying Chen, Shengpei Wang, Chi Wang, Na Zhang, Ying Li, Hangting Shi, Peicen Zou, Huiguang He, Yajuan Wang
{"title":"基于机器学习的新生儿细菌性脑膜炎短期不良预后预测模型的建立","authors":"Ying Chen,&nbsp;Shengpei Wang,&nbsp;Chi Wang,&nbsp;Na Zhang,&nbsp;Ying Li,&nbsp;Hangting Shi,&nbsp;Peicen Zou,&nbsp;Huiguang He,&nbsp;Yajuan Wang","doi":"10.1002/ila2.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Neonatal bacterial meningitis (NBM) is an extremely severe disease in the neonatal period. Early identification of high-risk infants is critical for timely intervention, yet prognostic assessment remains challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and variable clinical trajectories. While machine learning (ML) has shown promise in predicting outcomes for other neonatal conditions, its application for short-term adverse prognosis in NBM remains unexplored. This study aims to systematically evaluate ML models to screen for risk factors and identify the optimal predictive model to provide clinicians with a data-driven tool for the stratified management of NBM patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical data of 433 term neonates with NBM hospitalized in the Department of Neonatology at the Capital Institute of Pediatrics between January 2013 and December 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Based on discharge outcomes, patients were stratified into adverse (<i>n</i> = 84) and favorable prognosis (<i>n</i> = 349) groups. From an initial set of 32 clinical variables derived from clinical and laboratory data. Seventeen variables (15 via maximum Relevance Minimum Redundancy algorithm, two clinical-based) were selected. Nine machine learning models were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the nine models, the logistic regression model achieved optimal performance (AUC: 0.908, accuracy: 0.890, sensitivity: 0.541, specificity: 0.974, positive predictive value: 0.845, negative predictive value: 0.898). Key predictors included muscle tone abnormalities, seizures, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein &gt; 2000 mg/L, mechanical ventilation, hypotension requiring inotropes, CSF glucose &lt; 2.0 mmol/L, bulging fontanelle, C-reactive protein, hepatomegaly, and positive blood culture.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Machine learning models can be reliable tools for predicting short-term adverse prognoses in patients with NBM. The logistic regression model demonstrated the best predictive performance, which can help clinicians identify high-risk patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100656,"journal":{"name":"iLABMED","volume":"3 3","pages":"292-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ila2.70030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment of a Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Short-Term Adverse Prognosis in Neonatal Bacterial Meningitis\",\"authors\":\"Ying Chen,&nbsp;Shengpei Wang,&nbsp;Chi Wang,&nbsp;Na Zhang,&nbsp;Ying Li,&nbsp;Hangting Shi,&nbsp;Peicen Zou,&nbsp;Huiguang He,&nbsp;Yajuan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ila2.70030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Neonatal bacterial meningitis (NBM) is an extremely severe disease in the neonatal period. Early identification of high-risk infants is critical for timely intervention, yet prognostic assessment remains challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and variable clinical trajectories. While machine learning (ML) has shown promise in predicting outcomes for other neonatal conditions, its application for short-term adverse prognosis in NBM remains unexplored. This study aims to systematically evaluate ML models to screen for risk factors and identify the optimal predictive model to provide clinicians with a data-driven tool for the stratified management of NBM patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinical data of 433 term neonates with NBM hospitalized in the Department of Neonatology at the Capital Institute of Pediatrics between January 2013 and December 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Based on discharge outcomes, patients were stratified into adverse (<i>n</i> = 84) and favorable prognosis (<i>n</i> = 349) groups. From an initial set of 32 clinical variables derived from clinical and laboratory data. Seventeen variables (15 via maximum Relevance Minimum Redundancy algorithm, two clinical-based) were selected. Nine machine learning models were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among the nine models, the logistic regression model achieved optimal performance (AUC: 0.908, accuracy: 0.890, sensitivity: 0.541, specificity: 0.974, positive predictive value: 0.845, negative predictive value: 0.898). Key predictors included muscle tone abnormalities, seizures, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein &gt; 2000 mg/L, mechanical ventilation, hypotension requiring inotropes, CSF glucose &lt; 2.0 mmol/L, bulging fontanelle, C-reactive protein, hepatomegaly, and positive blood culture.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Machine learning models can be reliable tools for predicting short-term adverse prognoses in patients with NBM. The logistic regression model demonstrated the best predictive performance, which can help clinicians identify high-risk patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iLABMED\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"292-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ila2.70030\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iLABMED\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ila2.70030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLABMED","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ila2.70030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景新生儿细菌性脑膜炎(NBM)是新生儿时期一种极其严重的疾病。早期识别高危婴儿对于及时干预至关重要,但由于非特异性症状和可变的临床轨迹,预后评估仍然具有挑战性。虽然机器学习(ML)在预测其他新生儿疾病的预后方面表现出了希望,但其在NBM短期不良预后方面的应用仍未得到探索。本研究旨在系统评估ML模型以筛选危险因素,并确定最佳预测模型,为临床医生提供数据驱动的工具,对NBM患者进行分层管理。方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2023年12月在首都儿科研究所新生儿科住院的433例足月新生儿NBM的临床资料。根据出院情况,将患者分为不良组(84例)和预后良好组(349例)。从临床和实验室数据中得出的32个临床变量的初始集。选取17个变量(15个通过最大相关最小冗余算法,2个基于临床)。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值对9个机器学习模型进行评估。结果9个模型中,logistic回归模型的AUC为0.908,准确率为0.890,灵敏度为0.541,特异度为0.974,阳性预测值为0.845,阴性预测值为0.898。关键预测指标包括肌张力异常、癫痫发作、脑脊液蛋白≥2000 mg/L、机械通气、低血压需要使用肌力药物、脑脊液葡萄糖≥2.0 mmol/L、囟鼓胀、c反应蛋白、肝肿大和血培养阳性。结论:机器学习模型是预测NBM患者短期不良预后的可靠工具。logistic回归模型的预测效果最好,可以帮助临床医生识别高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Establishment of a Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Short-Term Adverse Prognosis in Neonatal Bacterial Meningitis

Establishment of a Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Short-Term Adverse Prognosis in Neonatal Bacterial Meningitis

Background

Neonatal bacterial meningitis (NBM) is an extremely severe disease in the neonatal period. Early identification of high-risk infants is critical for timely intervention, yet prognostic assessment remains challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and variable clinical trajectories. While machine learning (ML) has shown promise in predicting outcomes for other neonatal conditions, its application for short-term adverse prognosis in NBM remains unexplored. This study aims to systematically evaluate ML models to screen for risk factors and identify the optimal predictive model to provide clinicians with a data-driven tool for the stratified management of NBM patients.

Methods

Clinical data of 433 term neonates with NBM hospitalized in the Department of Neonatology at the Capital Institute of Pediatrics between January 2013 and December 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Based on discharge outcomes, patients were stratified into adverse (n = 84) and favorable prognosis (n = 349) groups. From an initial set of 32 clinical variables derived from clinical and laboratory data. Seventeen variables (15 via maximum Relevance Minimum Redundancy algorithm, two clinical-based) were selected. Nine machine learning models were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Results

Among the nine models, the logistic regression model achieved optimal performance (AUC: 0.908, accuracy: 0.890, sensitivity: 0.541, specificity: 0.974, positive predictive value: 0.845, negative predictive value: 0.898). Key predictors included muscle tone abnormalities, seizures, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein > 2000 mg/L, mechanical ventilation, hypotension requiring inotropes, CSF glucose < 2.0 mmol/L, bulging fontanelle, C-reactive protein, hepatomegaly, and positive blood culture.

Conclusions

Machine learning models can be reliable tools for predicting short-term adverse prognoses in patients with NBM. The logistic regression model demonstrated the best predictive performance, which can help clinicians identify high-risk patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信