利用空白填充数据集绘制植物功能性状,为管理和建模提供信息

IF 6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Samuel C. Andrew, Irene Martín-Forés, Greg R. Guerin, David Coleman, Daniel S. Falster, Elizabeth Wenk, Ian J. Wright, Rachael V. Gallagher
{"title":"利用空白填充数据集绘制植物功能性状,为管理和建模提供信息","authors":"Samuel C. Andrew,&nbsp;Irene Martín-Forés,&nbsp;Greg R. Guerin,&nbsp;David Coleman,&nbsp;Daniel S. Falster,&nbsp;Elizabeth Wenk,&nbsp;Ian J. Wright,&nbsp;Rachael V. Gallagher","doi":"10.1111/geb.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Plant traits are used to describe the functional properties of vegetation that are critical to terrestrial ecosystem services. Functional trait metrics for plant communities can be valuable for modelling important ecosystem properties such as fuel loads and nutrient cycling, future plant diversity and responses to global change. However, the vast scale of plant diversity means collecting trait and distribution data for all species globally is logistically challenging. Here, we evaluate the utilisation of gap-filling methods for providing more comprehensive functional trait metrics for plant communities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Current.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Australian native plants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here we use gap-filled species-level functional trait data and species distributions for Australia to map continental scale averages and variability in four core traits related to resource competition, energy budgeting and reproductive investment (maximum height, seed mass, leaf area and leaf mass per area [LMA]). We explore how trait patterns relate to climate (temperature and precipitation) and validate our mapping using comparable trait metrics derived from a network of 747 plot-based plant species inventories across the continent (AusPlots).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Trait maps for maximum height, seed mass and leaf area were strongly and positively correlated, while mean LMA and LMA variability were negatively correlated with other trait means. Biogeographic patterns of trait averages and variability could be mostly explained (78% to 92% of variance) by annual precipitation and mean annual temperature, and their interaction. LMA was an exception, with only 46% of variance in spatial patterns explained.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Similar trait-climate trends from trait maps and plot-based inventories give clarity to an outstanding question of whether trait mapping captures patterns also evident in higher-resolution field-based studies. Our results indicate that trait maps reliably recreate known patterns, albeit at a greater scale, and can be applied to ecosystem dynamics modelling and other pursuits such as conservation prioritisation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70136","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping Plant Functional Traits Using Gap-Filled Datasets to Inform Management and Modelling\",\"authors\":\"Samuel C. Andrew,&nbsp;Irene Martín-Forés,&nbsp;Greg R. Guerin,&nbsp;David Coleman,&nbsp;Daniel S. Falster,&nbsp;Elizabeth Wenk,&nbsp;Ian J. Wright,&nbsp;Rachael V. Gallagher\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.70136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Plant traits are used to describe the functional properties of vegetation that are critical to terrestrial ecosystem services. Functional trait metrics for plant communities can be valuable for modelling important ecosystem properties such as fuel loads and nutrient cycling, future plant diversity and responses to global change. However, the vast scale of plant diversity means collecting trait and distribution data for all species globally is logistically challenging. Here, we evaluate the utilisation of gap-filling methods for providing more comprehensive functional trait metrics for plant communities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>Current.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Australian native plants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Here we use gap-filled species-level functional trait data and species distributions for Australia to map continental scale averages and variability in four core traits related to resource competition, energy budgeting and reproductive investment (maximum height, seed mass, leaf area and leaf mass per area [LMA]). We explore how trait patterns relate to climate (temperature and precipitation) and validate our mapping using comparable trait metrics derived from a network of 747 plot-based plant species inventories across the continent (AusPlots).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Trait maps for maximum height, seed mass and leaf area were strongly and positively correlated, while mean LMA and LMA variability were negatively correlated with other trait means. Biogeographic patterns of trait averages and variability could be mostly explained (78% to 92% of variance) by annual precipitation and mean annual temperature, and their interaction. LMA was an exception, with only 46% of variance in spatial patterns explained.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Similar trait-climate trends from trait maps and plot-based inventories give clarity to an outstanding question of whether trait mapping captures patterns also evident in higher-resolution field-based studies. Our results indicate that trait maps reliably recreate known patterns, albeit at a greater scale, and can be applied to ecosystem dynamics modelling and other pursuits such as conservation prioritisation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70136\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70136\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70136","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的植物性状用于描述对陆地生态系统服务至关重要的植被功能特性。植物群落的功能性状指标对于模拟重要的生态系统特性(如燃料负荷和养分循环)、未来植物多样性和对全球变化的响应具有重要价值。然而,植物多样性的巨大规模意味着收集全球所有物种的性状和分布数据在后勤上具有挑战性。在此,我们评估了空白填补方法的利用,为植物群落提供更全面的功能性状指标。位置 澳大利亚。时间周期当前。主要分类群研究澳大利亚本土植物。方法利用澳大利亚空白填补物种水平的功能性状数据和物种分布,绘制了与资源竞争、能量预算和生殖投资相关的4个核心性状(最大高度、种子质量、叶面积和叶质量[LMA])的大陆尺度平均值和变异图。我们探索了性状模式与气候(温度和降水)的关系,并使用来自整个大陆747个基于样地的植物物种清单网络(AusPlots)的可比性状指标来验证我们的制图。结果最大高度、种子质量和叶面积性状图呈显著正相关,平均LMA和LMA变异率与其他性状图呈显著负相关。年降水量、年平均气温及其相互作用可解释性状平均和变异的生物地理格局(占变异的78% ~ 92%)。LMA是一个例外,只有46%的空间模式差异得到了解释。相似的性状-气候趋势,从性状图和基于图的调查提供了清晰的悬而未决的问题,是否性状图捕获模式也明显在高分辨率的实地研究。我们的研究结果表明,性状图谱可靠地再现了已知的模式,尽管在更大的尺度上,并且可以应用于生态系统动力学建模和其他追求,如保护优先级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mapping Plant Functional Traits Using Gap-Filled Datasets to Inform Management and Modelling

Mapping Plant Functional Traits Using Gap-Filled Datasets to Inform Management and Modelling

Aim

Plant traits are used to describe the functional properties of vegetation that are critical to terrestrial ecosystem services. Functional trait metrics for plant communities can be valuable for modelling important ecosystem properties such as fuel loads and nutrient cycling, future plant diversity and responses to global change. However, the vast scale of plant diversity means collecting trait and distribution data for all species globally is logistically challenging. Here, we evaluate the utilisation of gap-filling methods for providing more comprehensive functional trait metrics for plant communities.

Location

Australia.

Time Period

Current.

Major Taxa Studied

Australian native plants.

Methods

Here we use gap-filled species-level functional trait data and species distributions for Australia to map continental scale averages and variability in four core traits related to resource competition, energy budgeting and reproductive investment (maximum height, seed mass, leaf area and leaf mass per area [LMA]). We explore how trait patterns relate to climate (temperature and precipitation) and validate our mapping using comparable trait metrics derived from a network of 747 plot-based plant species inventories across the continent (AusPlots).

Results

Trait maps for maximum height, seed mass and leaf area were strongly and positively correlated, while mean LMA and LMA variability were negatively correlated with other trait means. Biogeographic patterns of trait averages and variability could be mostly explained (78% to 92% of variance) by annual precipitation and mean annual temperature, and their interaction. LMA was an exception, with only 46% of variance in spatial patterns explained.

Main Conclusions

Similar trait-climate trends from trait maps and plot-based inventories give clarity to an outstanding question of whether trait mapping captures patterns also evident in higher-resolution field-based studies. Our results indicate that trait maps reliably recreate known patterns, albeit at a greater scale, and can be applied to ecosystem dynamics modelling and other pursuits such as conservation prioritisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信