利用CAMECA 1300HR3 LG-SIMS对磷灰石进行原位微束U-Pb定年

IF 3.1 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Yue Guan, Jun-Yong Li, Allen K. Kennedy, De-Hong Du, Lan-Lan Tian, Wen-Li Xie and Xiao-Lei Wang
{"title":"利用CAMECA 1300HR3 LG-SIMS对磷灰石进行原位微束U-Pb定年","authors":"Yue Guan, Jun-Yong Li, Allen K. Kennedy, De-Hong Du, Lan-Lan Tian, Wen-Li Xie and Xiao-Lei Wang","doi":"10.1039/D5JA00266D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Apatite is a U-bearing mineral commonly present in planetary materials and has been widely used for geochronological studies. However, precise <em>in situ</em> U–Pb dating of tiny apatite (grain size &lt;15 μm) remains challenging due to its low abundance of uranium (U) and radiogenic lead (Pb). To address this issue, we have developed two micro-beam analytical methods (<em>i.e.</em>, 5 nA and 500 pA primary beams) using three apatite reference materials (BR5, AFG2, and Otter lake) and a CAMECA IMS 1300HR<small><sup>3</sup></small> large-geometry secondary ion mass spectrometry (LG-SIMS). The 5 nA method (mono) produces a larger sputter crater (12.5 × 12.5 × 4.1 μm) and achieves higher dating precision, with age errors (<em>n</em> = 20) of &lt;0.5% (1σ) for BR5, &lt;2.5% (1σ) for AFG2, and &lt;0.7% (1σ) for Otter lake. In contrast, the 500 pA method (multi) produces a smaller sputter crater (5.3 × 5.3 × 1.4 μm) that results in lower dating precision, with age errors (<em>n</em> = 25) of &lt;1.3% (1σ) for BR5, &lt;4.1% (1σ) for AFG2, and &lt;1.8% (1σ) for Otter lake. Both methods yield accurate ages within the uncertainties and are applicable for apatite U–Pb dating. For data reduction, we recommend the use of the Pb/U <em>vs.</em> UO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/U calibration protocol, because it introduces less age bias compared to those of Pb/U <em>vs.</em> UO/U and Pb/UO <em>vs.</em> UO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/UO protocols. The methodological approaches of this study enable high-precision <em>in situ</em> U–Pb dating of tiny apatite and they will expand the application of LG-SIMS in geochronological studies of (extra-) terrestrial apatite samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":81,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","volume":" 10","pages":" 2753-2762"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In situ micro-beam U–Pb dating of apatite using CAMECA 1300HR3 LG-SIMS\",\"authors\":\"Yue Guan, Jun-Yong Li, Allen K. Kennedy, De-Hong Du, Lan-Lan Tian, Wen-Li Xie and Xiao-Lei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5JA00266D\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Apatite is a U-bearing mineral commonly present in planetary materials and has been widely used for geochronological studies. However, precise <em>in situ</em> U–Pb dating of tiny apatite (grain size &lt;15 μm) remains challenging due to its low abundance of uranium (U) and radiogenic lead (Pb). To address this issue, we have developed two micro-beam analytical methods (<em>i.e.</em>, 5 nA and 500 pA primary beams) using three apatite reference materials (BR5, AFG2, and Otter lake) and a CAMECA IMS 1300HR<small><sup>3</sup></small> large-geometry secondary ion mass spectrometry (LG-SIMS). The 5 nA method (mono) produces a larger sputter crater (12.5 × 12.5 × 4.1 μm) and achieves higher dating precision, with age errors (<em>n</em> = 20) of &lt;0.5% (1σ) for BR5, &lt;2.5% (1σ) for AFG2, and &lt;0.7% (1σ) for Otter lake. In contrast, the 500 pA method (multi) produces a smaller sputter crater (5.3 × 5.3 × 1.4 μm) that results in lower dating precision, with age errors (<em>n</em> = 25) of &lt;1.3% (1σ) for BR5, &lt;4.1% (1σ) for AFG2, and &lt;1.8% (1σ) for Otter lake. Both methods yield accurate ages within the uncertainties and are applicable for apatite U–Pb dating. For data reduction, we recommend the use of the Pb/U <em>vs.</em> UO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/U calibration protocol, because it introduces less age bias compared to those of Pb/U <em>vs.</em> UO/U and Pb/UO <em>vs.</em> UO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/UO protocols. The methodological approaches of this study enable high-precision <em>in situ</em> U–Pb dating of tiny apatite and they will expand the application of LG-SIMS in geochronological studies of (extra-) terrestrial apatite samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\" 2753-2762\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ja/d5ja00266d\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ja/d5ja00266d","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

磷灰石是一种含铀矿物,普遍存在于行星物质中,已被广泛用于年代学研究。然而,由于微小磷灰石(粒径<;15 μm)的铀(U)和放射性铅(Pb)丰度较低,因此对其进行精确的原位U - Pb定年仍然具有挑战性。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了两种微光束分析方法(即5na和500pa主光束),使用三种磷灰石基准物质(BR5, AFG2和Otter lake)和CAMECA IMS 1300HR3大几何二次离子质谱(LG-SIMS)。5 nA法(单一)产生较大的溅射坑(12.5 × 12.5 × 4.1 μm),测年精度较高,BR5测年误差为<;0.5% (1σ), AFG2测年误差为<;2.5% (1σ), Otter lake测年误差为<;0.7% (1σ)。相比之下,500 pA法(multi)产生的溅射坑较小(5.3 × 5.3 × 1.4 μm),测年精度较低,BR5测年误差为<;1.3% (1σ), AFG2测年误差为<;4.1% (1σ), Otter lake测年误差为<;1.8% (1σ)。两种方法都能在不确定度范围内得到准确的年龄,并适用于磷灰石U-Pb定年。对于数据缩减,我们建议使用Pb/U vs. UO2/U校准方案,因为与Pb/U vs. UO/U和Pb/UO vs. UO2/UO方案相比,它引入的年龄偏差更小。本研究的方法方法能够实现微小磷灰石的高精度原位U-Pb定年,并将扩展LG-SIMS在(外)陆地磷灰石样品年代学研究中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

In situ micro-beam U–Pb dating of apatite using CAMECA 1300HR3 LG-SIMS

In situ micro-beam U–Pb dating of apatite using CAMECA 1300HR3 LG-SIMS

Apatite is a U-bearing mineral commonly present in planetary materials and has been widely used for geochronological studies. However, precise in situ U–Pb dating of tiny apatite (grain size <15 μm) remains challenging due to its low abundance of uranium (U) and radiogenic lead (Pb). To address this issue, we have developed two micro-beam analytical methods (i.e., 5 nA and 500 pA primary beams) using three apatite reference materials (BR5, AFG2, and Otter lake) and a CAMECA IMS 1300HR3 large-geometry secondary ion mass spectrometry (LG-SIMS). The 5 nA method (mono) produces a larger sputter crater (12.5 × 12.5 × 4.1 μm) and achieves higher dating precision, with age errors (n = 20) of <0.5% (1σ) for BR5, <2.5% (1σ) for AFG2, and <0.7% (1σ) for Otter lake. In contrast, the 500 pA method (multi) produces a smaller sputter crater (5.3 × 5.3 × 1.4 μm) that results in lower dating precision, with age errors (n = 25) of <1.3% (1σ) for BR5, <4.1% (1σ) for AFG2, and <1.8% (1σ) for Otter lake. Both methods yield accurate ages within the uncertainties and are applicable for apatite U–Pb dating. For data reduction, we recommend the use of the Pb/U vs. UO2/U calibration protocol, because it introduces less age bias compared to those of Pb/U vs. UO/U and Pb/UO vs. UO2/UO protocols. The methodological approaches of this study enable high-precision in situ U–Pb dating of tiny apatite and they will expand the application of LG-SIMS in geochronological studies of (extra-) terrestrial apatite samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
26.50%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Innovative research on the fundamental theory and application of spectrometric techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信