全氟辛酸(PFOA)对好氧和厌氧农业土壤微生物群落的差异影响

IF 4.3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Omega Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1021/acsomega.5c06624
Nusrat Easmin, , , Parikrama Sapkota, , , Kelly S. Ramirez, , , Yasaman Mohammadi, , , Mahesh Narayan, , and , Hamidreza Sharifan*, 
{"title":"全氟辛酸(PFOA)对好氧和厌氧农业土壤微生物群落的差异影响","authors":"Nusrat Easmin,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Parikrama Sapkota,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Kelly S. Ramirez,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Yasaman Mohammadi,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Mahesh Narayan,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Hamidreza Sharifan*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.5c06624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is a persistent environmental contaminant with the potential to disrupt soil-plant systems. This study investigated the impacts of PFOA on soil microbial viability and community composition under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, to understand microbial resilience and adaptability to pollutant stress. Soil samples from an uncontaminated agricultural field (2.26 ng/g) were amended with varying PFOA concentrations (0, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mg/kg) and incubated under controlled conditions for 7 days. Microbial viability was assessed through colony-forming unit (cfu) counts, while community composition was characterized via 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results showed a significant decline (8–79%) in microbial viability at higher PFOA concentrations across both environments, with anaerobic soils exhibiting greater sensitivity, underscoring the role of oxygen availability in microbial pollutant tolerance. Taxonomic analysis revealed concentration-dependent shifts, with Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria dominating under aerobic conditions, and Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, and Acidobacteria prevailing under anaerobic conditions. The novelty of this study lies in its systematic comparison of microbial community responses and adaptive mechanisms under both aerobic and anaerobic soil conditions, providing critical insights into the differential impacts of PFOA that have previously not been explored.The findings highlight the ecological significance of resilient taxa in sustaining carbon and nutrient turnover in contaminated soils.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 38","pages":"44541–44548"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsomega.5c06624","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Impacts of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) on Soil Microbial Communities in Aerobic and Anaerobic Agricultural Soils\",\"authors\":\"Nusrat Easmin,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Parikrama Sapkota,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Kelly S. Ramirez,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Yasaman Mohammadi,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Mahesh Narayan,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Hamidreza Sharifan*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsomega.5c06624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is a persistent environmental contaminant with the potential to disrupt soil-plant systems. This study investigated the impacts of PFOA on soil microbial viability and community composition under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, to understand microbial resilience and adaptability to pollutant stress. Soil samples from an uncontaminated agricultural field (2.26 ng/g) were amended with varying PFOA concentrations (0, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mg/kg) and incubated under controlled conditions for 7 days. Microbial viability was assessed through colony-forming unit (cfu) counts, while community composition was characterized via 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results showed a significant decline (8–79%) in microbial viability at higher PFOA concentrations across both environments, with anaerobic soils exhibiting greater sensitivity, underscoring the role of oxygen availability in microbial pollutant tolerance. Taxonomic analysis revealed concentration-dependent shifts, with Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria dominating under aerobic conditions, and Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, and Acidobacteria prevailing under anaerobic conditions. The novelty of this study lies in its systematic comparison of microbial community responses and adaptive mechanisms under both aerobic and anaerobic soil conditions, providing critical insights into the differential impacts of PFOA that have previously not been explored.The findings highlight the ecological significance of resilient taxa in sustaining carbon and nutrient turnover in contaminated soils.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Omega\",\"volume\":\"10 38\",\"pages\":\"44541–44548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsomega.5c06624\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c06624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c06624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全氟辛酸(PFOA)是一种持久性环境污染物,具有破坏土壤-植物系统的潜力。研究了PFOA在好氧和厌氧条件下对土壤微生物活力和群落组成的影响,了解微生物对污染物胁迫的恢复力和适应性。采用不同浓度的PFOA(0、40、60、80和100 mg/kg)对未受污染的农田土壤样品(2.26 ng/g)进行处理,并在控制条件下孵育7天。通过菌落形成单位(cfu)计数评估微生物活力,通过16S rRNA基因测序表征群落组成。结果显示,两种环境中PFOA浓度较高时,微生物活力显著下降(8-79%),厌氧土壤表现出更大的敏感性,强调了氧气有效性在微生物污染物耐受性中的作用。分类学分析显示出浓度依赖性的变化,在好氧条件下放线菌门和变形菌门占主导地位,在厌氧条件下绿杆菌门、拟杆菌门和酸杆菌门占主导地位。本研究的新颖之处在于它系统地比较了好氧和厌氧土壤条件下微生物群落的响应和适应机制,为PFOA的差异影响提供了以前未被探索的关键见解。这些发现强调了弹性类群在维持污染土壤中碳和养分周转方面的生态意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential Impacts of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) on Soil Microbial Communities in Aerobic and Anaerobic Agricultural Soils

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is a persistent environmental contaminant with the potential to disrupt soil-plant systems. This study investigated the impacts of PFOA on soil microbial viability and community composition under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, to understand microbial resilience and adaptability to pollutant stress. Soil samples from an uncontaminated agricultural field (2.26 ng/g) were amended with varying PFOA concentrations (0, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mg/kg) and incubated under controlled conditions for 7 days. Microbial viability was assessed through colony-forming unit (cfu) counts, while community composition was characterized via 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results showed a significant decline (8–79%) in microbial viability at higher PFOA concentrations across both environments, with anaerobic soils exhibiting greater sensitivity, underscoring the role of oxygen availability in microbial pollutant tolerance. Taxonomic analysis revealed concentration-dependent shifts, with Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria dominating under aerobic conditions, and Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, and Acidobacteria prevailing under anaerobic conditions. The novelty of this study lies in its systematic comparison of microbial community responses and adaptive mechanisms under both aerobic and anaerobic soil conditions, providing critical insights into the differential impacts of PFOA that have previously not been explored.The findings highlight the ecological significance of resilient taxa in sustaining carbon and nutrient turnover in contaminated soils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信