释放基于自然的解决方案潜力:运营工业场地地下水修复的生命周期评估

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Han Xu , Deyi Hou
{"title":"释放基于自然的解决方案潜力:运营工业场地地下水修复的生命周期评估","authors":"Han Xu ,&nbsp;Deyi Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While life cycle assessment (LCA) has been extensively applied for environmental impact quantification in brownfield remediation, its systematic implementation in guiding groundwater contamination control at operational industrial facilities, where large-scale in-situ remediation is often constrained by ongoing activities, remains less explored. This study seeks to deal with this challenge by conducting a cradle-to-grave LCA of three benzene-contaminated groundwater remediation strategies at an operational industrial site in northeastern China: (1) vertical barriers (VB), (2) pump-and-treat (PT), and (3) a novel nature-based solution (NBS) leveraging phytoremediation with integrated biomass valorization. Results reveal that the baseline NBS scenario (2.63 × 10<sup>4</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq, excluding biomass valorization) reduces life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by three orders of magnitude compared to traditional VB (1.01 × 10<sup>7</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) and PT (1.44 × 10<sup>7</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) scenarios, showcasing its remarkable sustainability potential. Process-specific optimization pathways, particularly enhanced biomass utilization and carbon storage strategies, further lower GHG emissions to achieve net-positive carbon impacts (−180 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> fiber), thus amplifying green sustainability. The LCA also identified critical process contributors for each of these remediation alternatives and proposed targeted optimization strategies to further minimize environmental burdens across life cycle stages. Overall, by bridging material innovation, adaptive wellfield design, biomass valorization, and life cycle carbon quantification, this study provides scientific support, new perspectives and practical approaches to advance green and sustainable remediation for benzene-contaminated groundwater.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"528 ","pages":"Article 146697"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking nature-based solution potential: Life cycle assessment of groundwater remediation at operating industrial sites\",\"authors\":\"Han Xu ,&nbsp;Deyi Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While life cycle assessment (LCA) has been extensively applied for environmental impact quantification in brownfield remediation, its systematic implementation in guiding groundwater contamination control at operational industrial facilities, where large-scale in-situ remediation is often constrained by ongoing activities, remains less explored. This study seeks to deal with this challenge by conducting a cradle-to-grave LCA of three benzene-contaminated groundwater remediation strategies at an operational industrial site in northeastern China: (1) vertical barriers (VB), (2) pump-and-treat (PT), and (3) a novel nature-based solution (NBS) leveraging phytoremediation with integrated biomass valorization. Results reveal that the baseline NBS scenario (2.63 × 10<sup>4</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq, excluding biomass valorization) reduces life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by three orders of magnitude compared to traditional VB (1.01 × 10<sup>7</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) and PT (1.44 × 10<sup>7</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) scenarios, showcasing its remarkable sustainability potential. Process-specific optimization pathways, particularly enhanced biomass utilization and carbon storage strategies, further lower GHG emissions to achieve net-positive carbon impacts (−180 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> fiber), thus amplifying green sustainability. The LCA also identified critical process contributors for each of these remediation alternatives and proposed targeted optimization strategies to further minimize environmental burdens across life cycle stages. Overall, by bridging material innovation, adaptive wellfield design, biomass valorization, and life cycle carbon quantification, this study provides scientific support, new perspectives and practical approaches to advance green and sustainable remediation for benzene-contaminated groundwater.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"528 \",\"pages\":\"Article 146697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625020475\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625020475","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然生命周期评估(LCA)已被广泛应用于棕地修复的环境影响量化,但其在指导运营工业设施地下水污染控制方面的系统实施仍有待探索,因为大规模的原位修复往往受到正在进行的活动的限制。为了应对这一挑战,本研究在中国东北的一个运营工业基地对三种苯污染地下水修复策略进行了从摇篮到坟墓的LCA:(1)垂直屏障(VB),(2)抽水处理(PT),以及(3)基于自然的新型解决方案(NBS),利用植物修复和综合生物量增值。结果表明,与传统的VB情景(1.01 × 107 kg CO2-eq)和PT情景(1.44 × 107 kg CO2-eq)相比,基线NBS情景(2.63 × 104 kg CO2-eq,不包括生物质价值)减少了三个数量级的生命周期温室气体(GHG)排放,显示出显著的可持续性潜力。特定工艺的优化途径,特别是提高生物质利用和碳储存策略,进一步降低温室气体排放,实现净碳正影响(- 180千克二氧化碳当量/立方米纤维),从而扩大绿色可持续性。LCA还确定了每种补救方案的关键过程贡献者,并提出了有针对性的优化策略,以进一步减少整个生命周期阶段的环境负担。总体而言,通过材料创新、适应性井田设计、生物质价值化和生命周期碳量化,本研究为推进苯污染地下水的绿色可持续修复提供了科学支持、新视角和实用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unlocking nature-based solution potential: Life cycle assessment of groundwater remediation at operating industrial sites
While life cycle assessment (LCA) has been extensively applied for environmental impact quantification in brownfield remediation, its systematic implementation in guiding groundwater contamination control at operational industrial facilities, where large-scale in-situ remediation is often constrained by ongoing activities, remains less explored. This study seeks to deal with this challenge by conducting a cradle-to-grave LCA of three benzene-contaminated groundwater remediation strategies at an operational industrial site in northeastern China: (1) vertical barriers (VB), (2) pump-and-treat (PT), and (3) a novel nature-based solution (NBS) leveraging phytoremediation with integrated biomass valorization. Results reveal that the baseline NBS scenario (2.63 × 104 kg CO2-eq, excluding biomass valorization) reduces life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by three orders of magnitude compared to traditional VB (1.01 × 107 kg CO2-eq) and PT (1.44 × 107 kg CO2-eq) scenarios, showcasing its remarkable sustainability potential. Process-specific optimization pathways, particularly enhanced biomass utilization and carbon storage strategies, further lower GHG emissions to achieve net-positive carbon impacts (−180 kg CO2-eq/m3 fiber), thus amplifying green sustainability. The LCA also identified critical process contributors for each of these remediation alternatives and proposed targeted optimization strategies to further minimize environmental burdens across life cycle stages. Overall, by bridging material innovation, adaptive wellfield design, biomass valorization, and life cycle carbon quantification, this study provides scientific support, new perspectives and practical approaches to advance green and sustainable remediation for benzene-contaminated groundwater.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信