首次精神病发作缓解后早期减量或停药vs维持抗精神病药物:一项随机临床试验。

IF 17.1 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Iris E Sommer,Franciska de Beer,Shiral Gangadin,Lieuwe de Haan,Wim Veling,Nico van Beveren,Nynke Boonstra,Bram-Sieben Rosema,Jim van Os,Martijn Kikkert,Sanne Koops,Jort Noorman,Frederick Thielen,Ben Wijnen,Marieke Begemann,
{"title":"首次精神病发作缓解后早期减量或停药vs维持抗精神病药物:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Iris E Sommer,Franciska de Beer,Shiral Gangadin,Lieuwe de Haan,Wim Veling,Nico van Beveren,Nynke Boonstra,Bram-Sieben Rosema,Jim van Os,Martijn Kikkert,Sanne Koops,Jort Noorman,Frederick Thielen,Ben Wijnen,Marieke Begemann, ","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.2525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nDose reduction or discontinuation (DRD) early after remission from first-episode psychosis (FEP) increases short-term relapse risk. Controversy remains regarding potential benefits in functioning over the longer term because studies with long-term outcomes show conflicting findings.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo compare short- and long-term effects between DRD and maintenance medication over a 4-year period in a large sample of patients with FEP.\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nThe Handling Antipsychotic Medication Long-Term Evaluation of Targeted Treatment (HAMLETT) study is a single-blind pragmatic randomized (1:1) clinical trial conducted in 26 specialized psychosis units in the Netherlands from September 2017 to March 2023. Patients remitted for FEP from in- and outpatient services were included.\r\n\r\nInterventions\r\nDRD within 12 months after remission compared with 12 months maintenance treatment.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nThe primary outcome was patient-rated functioning, measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2). Secondary outcomes were researcher-rated global assessment of functioning (GAF), quality of life, relapse, symptom severity (measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS]), serious adverse events, and adverse effects.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nA total of 347 patients (241 male [69.5%]; mean [SD] age, 27.9 [8.7] years) were included, with 168 randomized to early DRD and 179 to maintenance. WHODAS-2 showed no time × condition interaction. In the first year, DRD was associated with higher risk of relapse (odds ratio, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.08 to 7.66; P = .04) and lower quality of life (β = -3.31; 95% CI, -6.34 to -0.29; P = .03). At 3 years (β = 3.61; 95% CI, 0.28 to 6.95; P = .03) and 4 years (β = 6.13; 95% CI, 2.03 to 10.22; P = .003), a nonlinear effect of time occurred, showing significantly better GAF for patients in the DRD condition, with a similar trend for PANSS at 4 years (P for trend = .06). Although SAEs and adverse effects were similar between groups, 3 confirmed deaths by suicide occurred in the DRD group, against 1 death by suicide in the maintenance group.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nThis randomized clinical trial found that DRD posed risks of relapse and worse quality of life over the first year but yielded better researcher-rated functioning at the third and fourth year, with a similar trend for symptom severity; because antipsychotic medication doses were comparable in the 2 groups from 1 year onwards, this finding is not a direct result of lower medication but may reflect a learning experience to use antipsychotics to better handle psychotic vulnerability. These findings suggest that the potential learning and empowering element of DRD needs to be weighed carefully against short-term risks.\r\n\r\nTrial registration\r\nEudraCT number: 2017-002406-12.","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Dose Reduction or Discontinuation vs Maintenance Antipsychotics After First Psychotic Episode Remission: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Iris E Sommer,Franciska de Beer,Shiral Gangadin,Lieuwe de Haan,Wim Veling,Nico van Beveren,Nynke Boonstra,Bram-Sieben Rosema,Jim van Os,Martijn Kikkert,Sanne Koops,Jort Noorman,Frederick Thielen,Ben Wijnen,Marieke Begemann, \",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.2525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Importance\\r\\nDose reduction or discontinuation (DRD) early after remission from first-episode psychosis (FEP) increases short-term relapse risk. Controversy remains regarding potential benefits in functioning over the longer term because studies with long-term outcomes show conflicting findings.\\r\\n\\r\\nObjective\\r\\nTo compare short- and long-term effects between DRD and maintenance medication over a 4-year period in a large sample of patients with FEP.\\r\\n\\r\\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\\r\\nThe Handling Antipsychotic Medication Long-Term Evaluation of Targeted Treatment (HAMLETT) study is a single-blind pragmatic randomized (1:1) clinical trial conducted in 26 specialized psychosis units in the Netherlands from September 2017 to March 2023. Patients remitted for FEP from in- and outpatient services were included.\\r\\n\\r\\nInterventions\\r\\nDRD within 12 months after remission compared with 12 months maintenance treatment.\\r\\n\\r\\nMain Outcomes and Measures\\r\\nThe primary outcome was patient-rated functioning, measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2). Secondary outcomes were researcher-rated global assessment of functioning (GAF), quality of life, relapse, symptom severity (measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS]), serious adverse events, and adverse effects.\\r\\n\\r\\nResults\\r\\nA total of 347 patients (241 male [69.5%]; mean [SD] age, 27.9 [8.7] years) were included, with 168 randomized to early DRD and 179 to maintenance. WHODAS-2 showed no time × condition interaction. In the first year, DRD was associated with higher risk of relapse (odds ratio, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.08 to 7.66; P = .04) and lower quality of life (β = -3.31; 95% CI, -6.34 to -0.29; P = .03). At 3 years (β = 3.61; 95% CI, 0.28 to 6.95; P = .03) and 4 years (β = 6.13; 95% CI, 2.03 to 10.22; P = .003), a nonlinear effect of time occurred, showing significantly better GAF for patients in the DRD condition, with a similar trend for PANSS at 4 years (P for trend = .06). Although SAEs and adverse effects were similar between groups, 3 confirmed deaths by suicide occurred in the DRD group, against 1 death by suicide in the maintenance group.\\r\\n\\r\\nConclusions and Relevance\\r\\nThis randomized clinical trial found that DRD posed risks of relapse and worse quality of life over the first year but yielded better researcher-rated functioning at the third and fourth year, with a similar trend for symptom severity; because antipsychotic medication doses were comparable in the 2 groups from 1 year onwards, this finding is not a direct result of lower medication but may reflect a learning experience to use antipsychotics to better handle psychotic vulnerability. These findings suggest that the potential learning and empowering element of DRD needs to be weighed carefully against short-term risks.\\r\\n\\r\\nTrial registration\\r\\nEudraCT number: 2017-002406-12.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.2525\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.2525","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

首发精神病(FEP)缓解后早期减量或停药(DRD)增加短期复发风险。关于长期功能的潜在益处仍然存在争议,因为长期结果的研究显示出相互矛盾的结果。目的比较大样本FEP患者4年期间DRD和维持药物的短期和长期疗效。设计、环境和参与者处理抗精神病药物靶向治疗的长期评估(HAMLETT)研究是一项单盲实用随机(1:1)临床试验,于2017年9月至2023年3月在荷兰的26个精神病专科单位进行。从门诊和住院部接受FEP治疗的患者也包括在内。缓解后12个月内的干预与12个月的维持治疗相比。主要结局和测量主要结局是患者评定的功能,由世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0 (WHODAS-2)测量。次要结局是研究人员评定的整体功能评估(GAF)、生活质量、复发、症状严重程度(通过阳性和阴性综合征量表[PANSS]测量)、严重不良事件和不良反应。结果共纳入347例患者,其中男性241例(69.5%),平均[SD]年龄27.9[8.7]岁,168例随机分为早期DRD组,179例随机分为维持组。WHODAS-2无时间×条件交互作用。在第一年,DRD与较高的复发风险相关(优势比,2.84;95% CI, 1.08 ~ 7.66; P =。04)和较低的生活质量(β = -3.31; 95% CI, -6.34至-0.29;P = .03)。3年时(β = 3.61; 95% CI, 0.28 ~ 6.95;03)和4年(β= 6.13;95%可信区间,2.03至10.22;P =。003),出现了时间的非线性效应,DRD患者的GAF明显更好,4年时PANSS也有类似的趋势(趋势P = .06)。尽管两组间的SAEs和不良反应相似,但DRD组有3例自杀死亡,而维持组有1例自杀死亡。结论和相关性:这项随机临床试验发现,DRD在第一年有复发风险,生活质量更差,但在第三和第四年产生了更好的研究人员评价的功能,症状严重程度也有类似的趋势;因为抗精神病药物的剂量在两组中从1年开始是相当的,这一发现并不是药物减少的直接结果,但可能反映了使用抗精神病药物来更好地处理精神病易感性的学习经验。这些发现表明,需要仔细权衡DRD的潜在学习和授权因素与短期风险。试验注册号:2017-002406-12。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Dose Reduction or Discontinuation vs Maintenance Antipsychotics After First Psychotic Episode Remission: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance Dose reduction or discontinuation (DRD) early after remission from first-episode psychosis (FEP) increases short-term relapse risk. Controversy remains regarding potential benefits in functioning over the longer term because studies with long-term outcomes show conflicting findings. Objective To compare short- and long-term effects between DRD and maintenance medication over a 4-year period in a large sample of patients with FEP. Design, Setting, and Participants The Handling Antipsychotic Medication Long-Term Evaluation of Targeted Treatment (HAMLETT) study is a single-blind pragmatic randomized (1:1) clinical trial conducted in 26 specialized psychosis units in the Netherlands from September 2017 to March 2023. Patients remitted for FEP from in- and outpatient services were included. Interventions DRD within 12 months after remission compared with 12 months maintenance treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was patient-rated functioning, measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2). Secondary outcomes were researcher-rated global assessment of functioning (GAF), quality of life, relapse, symptom severity (measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS]), serious adverse events, and adverse effects. Results A total of 347 patients (241 male [69.5%]; mean [SD] age, 27.9 [8.7] years) were included, with 168 randomized to early DRD and 179 to maintenance. WHODAS-2 showed no time × condition interaction. In the first year, DRD was associated with higher risk of relapse (odds ratio, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.08 to 7.66; P = .04) and lower quality of life (β = -3.31; 95% CI, -6.34 to -0.29; P = .03). At 3 years (β = 3.61; 95% CI, 0.28 to 6.95; P = .03) and 4 years (β = 6.13; 95% CI, 2.03 to 10.22; P = .003), a nonlinear effect of time occurred, showing significantly better GAF for patients in the DRD condition, with a similar trend for PANSS at 4 years (P for trend = .06). Although SAEs and adverse effects were similar between groups, 3 confirmed deaths by suicide occurred in the DRD group, against 1 death by suicide in the maintenance group. Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that DRD posed risks of relapse and worse quality of life over the first year but yielded better researcher-rated functioning at the third and fourth year, with a similar trend for symptom severity; because antipsychotic medication doses were comparable in the 2 groups from 1 year onwards, this finding is not a direct result of lower medication but may reflect a learning experience to use antipsychotics to better handle psychotic vulnerability. These findings suggest that the potential learning and empowering element of DRD needs to be weighed carefully against short-term risks. Trial registration EudraCT number: 2017-002406-12.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信