低危、早期乳腺癌的遗漏放疗:一项单中心、真实世界的比较分析。

Radiation oncology journal Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI:10.3857/roj.2025.00269
Youngju Song, Sae Byul Lee, Su Ssan Kim, Seung Do Ahn, Jong Won Lee, Jinhong Jung
{"title":"低危、早期乳腺癌的遗漏放疗:一项单中心、真实世界的比较分析。","authors":"Youngju Song, Sae Byul Lee, Su Ssan Kim, Seung Do Ahn, Jong Won Lee, Jinhong Jung","doi":"10.3857/roj.2025.00269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes between patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and those who did not, in a cohort of patients with low-risk, early-stage breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Postmenopausal women with pT1N0/Nx, grade 1-2, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, and Ki-67 ≤ 20% breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy between 2010 and 2020 were included. The decision on RT omission was based on physician assessment and patient preference. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes included locoregional recurrence, overall survival, and breast cancer-specific survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 742 patients, 707 received adjuvant RT (postoperative radiation therapy [PORT] group) and 35 did not (RT omission group). Baseline characteristics were generally similar; however, the RT omission group was older (median age, 76 years; range, 68 to 85 years) than the PORT group (median age, 62 years; range, 55 to 87 years). After a median follow-up of 60 months in the PORT group and 52 months in the RT omission group, the 5-year cumulative incidence of disease recurrence was 1.28% and 0%, respectively (Gray's test, p = 0.305). Locoregional recurrence occurred in seven patients (1.0%) in the PORT group, whereas no locoregional recurrences were observed in the RT omission group. The results remained consistent after propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-risk, early-stage breast cancer patients exhibited comparable disease recurrence and survival rates regardless of the RT status. Our study underscores the necessity for further investigation into RT omission in carefully selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94184,"journal":{"name":"Radiation oncology journal","volume":"43 3","pages":"151-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiotherapy omission in low-risk, early-stage breast cancer: a single-center, real-world comparative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Youngju Song, Sae Byul Lee, Su Ssan Kim, Seung Do Ahn, Jong Won Lee, Jinhong Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.3857/roj.2025.00269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes between patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and those who did not, in a cohort of patients with low-risk, early-stage breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Postmenopausal women with pT1N0/Nx, grade 1-2, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, and Ki-67 ≤ 20% breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy between 2010 and 2020 were included. The decision on RT omission was based on physician assessment and patient preference. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes included locoregional recurrence, overall survival, and breast cancer-specific survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 742 patients, 707 received adjuvant RT (postoperative radiation therapy [PORT] group) and 35 did not (RT omission group). Baseline characteristics were generally similar; however, the RT omission group was older (median age, 76 years; range, 68 to 85 years) than the PORT group (median age, 62 years; range, 55 to 87 years). After a median follow-up of 60 months in the PORT group and 52 months in the RT omission group, the 5-year cumulative incidence of disease recurrence was 1.28% and 0%, respectively (Gray's test, p = 0.305). Locoregional recurrence occurred in seven patients (1.0%) in the PORT group, whereas no locoregional recurrences were observed in the RT omission group. The results remained consistent after propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-risk, early-stage breast cancer patients exhibited comparable disease recurrence and survival rates regardless of the RT status. Our study underscores the necessity for further investigation into RT omission in carefully selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation oncology journal\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"151-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510750/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation oncology journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2025.00269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation oncology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2025.00269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较低风险早期乳腺癌患者队列中接受辅助放疗(RT)和未接受辅助放疗(RT)的患者的治疗结果。材料与方法:纳入2010 - 2020年间行保乳手术及辅助内分泌治疗的绝经后pT1N0/Nx、1-2级、激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子2阴性、Ki-67≤20%乳腺癌患者。不做放射治疗的决定是基于医生的评估和患者的偏好。主要终点是疾病的累积复发率。次要结局包括局部复发、总生存期和乳腺癌特异性生存期。结果:742例患者中,707例患者接受了辅助放疗(术后放疗[PORT]组),35例患者未接受辅助放疗(遗漏放疗组)。基线特征大体相似;然而,遗漏RT组的年龄(中位年龄76岁,范围68 ~ 85岁)大于PORT组(中位年龄62岁,范围55 ~ 87岁)。PORT组中位随访60个月,遗漏RT组中位随访52个月,5年累计疾病复发率分别为1.28%和0% (Gray检验,p = 0.305)。PORT组有7例(1.0%)患者出现局部复发,而遗漏RT组无局部复发。倾向评分匹配后,结果保持一致。结论:低危、早期乳腺癌患者不论放疗状态如何,均表现出相似的疾病复发率和生存率。我们的研究强调了在精心挑选的患者中进一步调查RT遗漏的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiotherapy omission in low-risk, early-stage breast cancer: a single-center, real-world comparative analysis.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes between patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and those who did not, in a cohort of patients with low-risk, early-stage breast cancer.

Materials and methods: Postmenopausal women with pT1N0/Nx, grade 1-2, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, and Ki-67 ≤ 20% breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy between 2010 and 2020 were included. The decision on RT omission was based on physician assessment and patient preference. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes included locoregional recurrence, overall survival, and breast cancer-specific survival.

Results: Of the 742 patients, 707 received adjuvant RT (postoperative radiation therapy [PORT] group) and 35 did not (RT omission group). Baseline characteristics were generally similar; however, the RT omission group was older (median age, 76 years; range, 68 to 85 years) than the PORT group (median age, 62 years; range, 55 to 87 years). After a median follow-up of 60 months in the PORT group and 52 months in the RT omission group, the 5-year cumulative incidence of disease recurrence was 1.28% and 0%, respectively (Gray's test, p = 0.305). Locoregional recurrence occurred in seven patients (1.0%) in the PORT group, whereas no locoregional recurrences were observed in the RT omission group. The results remained consistent after propensity score matching.

Conclusion: Low-risk, early-stage breast cancer patients exhibited comparable disease recurrence and survival rates regardless of the RT status. Our study underscores the necessity for further investigation into RT omission in carefully selected patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信