局部晚期胸腺瘤术后调强放疗剂量递减的可行性研究。

Radiation oncology journal Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-18 DOI:10.3857/roj.2025.00255
Youn Ji Hur, Eun Hwa Kim, Hyeok Choi, Sun Ho Min, Jaiwo Lee, Chang Geol Lee
{"title":"局部晚期胸腺瘤术后调强放疗剂量递减的可行性研究。","authors":"Youn Ji Hur, Eun Hwa Kim, Hyeok Choi, Sun Ho Min, Jaiwo Lee, Chang Geol Lee","doi":"10.3857/roj.2025.00255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate retrospectively the feasibility of reducing the standard postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) dose of 45-50 Gy for locally invasive thymoma to shorten treatment duration and minimize side effects, while preserving disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 2016 and June 2022, 150 locally advanced thymoma patients underwent surgery followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy, with a median follow-up of 40.8 months; the standard regimen was 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions (median biological effective dose [BED] 60 Gy), compared to a de-escalation regimen of 30-35 Gy in 10 fractions (median BED 47.25 Gy), with PFS as the primary endpoint, and overall survival (OS), DSS, and toxicity as secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between standard and de-escalation groups in 3-year PFS (p = 0.406), with both groups achieving 100% 3-year DSS; two deaths in the de-escalation group were due to double primary cancers. All locoregional recurrences occurred outside the radiation field. Factors including age, initial tumor size, myasthenia gravis, and pathological type showed no correlation with PFS or OS. No grade II toxicities occurred in the de-escalation group, whereas the standard group had three cases of grade II toxicity, specifically radiation pneumonitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiation dose de-escalation in locally advanced thymoma patients undergoing PORT showed comparable survival outcomes with reduced toxicity and shorter treatment duration, but requires longer follow-up to confirm efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":94184,"journal":{"name":"Radiation oncology journal","volume":"43 3","pages":"144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility study of dose de-escalation in postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy for locally advanced thymoma.\",\"authors\":\"Youn Ji Hur, Eun Hwa Kim, Hyeok Choi, Sun Ho Min, Jaiwo Lee, Chang Geol Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3857/roj.2025.00255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate retrospectively the feasibility of reducing the standard postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) dose of 45-50 Gy for locally invasive thymoma to shorten treatment duration and minimize side effects, while preserving disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 2016 and June 2022, 150 locally advanced thymoma patients underwent surgery followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy, with a median follow-up of 40.8 months; the standard regimen was 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions (median biological effective dose [BED] 60 Gy), compared to a de-escalation regimen of 30-35 Gy in 10 fractions (median BED 47.25 Gy), with PFS as the primary endpoint, and overall survival (OS), DSS, and toxicity as secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between standard and de-escalation groups in 3-year PFS (p = 0.406), with both groups achieving 100% 3-year DSS; two deaths in the de-escalation group were due to double primary cancers. All locoregional recurrences occurred outside the radiation field. Factors including age, initial tumor size, myasthenia gravis, and pathological type showed no correlation with PFS or OS. No grade II toxicities occurred in the de-escalation group, whereas the standard group had three cases of grade II toxicity, specifically radiation pneumonitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiation dose de-escalation in locally advanced thymoma patients undergoing PORT showed comparable survival outcomes with reduced toxicity and shorter treatment duration, but requires longer follow-up to confirm efficacy and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation oncology journal\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"144-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510745/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation oncology journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2025.00255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation oncology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2025.00255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在回顾性探讨降低局部侵袭性胸腺瘤术后标准放射治疗(PORT)剂量45-50 Gy的可行性,以缩短治疗时间,减少副作用,同时保持疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。材料与方法:2016年1月至2022年6月,150例局部晚期胸腺瘤患者接受手术后调强放疗,中位随访40.8个月;标准方案为45-50 Gy,分25组(中位生物有效剂量[BED] 60 Gy),而降级方案为30-35 Gy,分10组(中位生物有效剂量[BED] 47.25 Gy), PFS为主要终点,总生存期(OS)、DSS和毒性为次要终点。结果:标准组和降级组3年PFS无显著差异(p = 0.406),两组均达到100%的3年DSS;降级组中有2例死亡是由于双重原发癌症。所有局部复发发生在辐射场之外。年龄、肿瘤初始大小、重症肌无力、病理类型等因素与PFS和OS均无相关性。降级组没有发生II级毒性,而标准组有3例II级毒性,特别是放射性肺炎。结论:局部晚期胸腺瘤患者接受PORT治疗后,放射剂量降低显示出相当的生存结果,毒性降低,治疗时间缩短,但需要更长的随访时间来确认疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility study of dose de-escalation in postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy for locally advanced thymoma.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate retrospectively the feasibility of reducing the standard postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) dose of 45-50 Gy for locally invasive thymoma to shorten treatment duration and minimize side effects, while preserving disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Materials and methods: Between January 2016 and June 2022, 150 locally advanced thymoma patients underwent surgery followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy, with a median follow-up of 40.8 months; the standard regimen was 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions (median biological effective dose [BED] 60 Gy), compared to a de-escalation regimen of 30-35 Gy in 10 fractions (median BED 47.25 Gy), with PFS as the primary endpoint, and overall survival (OS), DSS, and toxicity as secondary endpoints.

Results: No significant differences were found between standard and de-escalation groups in 3-year PFS (p = 0.406), with both groups achieving 100% 3-year DSS; two deaths in the de-escalation group were due to double primary cancers. All locoregional recurrences occurred outside the radiation field. Factors including age, initial tumor size, myasthenia gravis, and pathological type showed no correlation with PFS or OS. No grade II toxicities occurred in the de-escalation group, whereas the standard group had three cases of grade II toxicity, specifically radiation pneumonitis.

Conclusion: Radiation dose de-escalation in locally advanced thymoma patients undergoing PORT showed comparable survival outcomes with reduced toxicity and shorter treatment duration, but requires longer follow-up to confirm efficacy and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信