一位前首席经济学家对过去25年澳大利亚政府养老政策的反思。

IF 1.4
David Cullen
{"title":"一位前首席经济学家对过去25年澳大利亚政府养老政策的反思。","authors":"David Cullen","doi":"10.1071/AH25202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety identified two key building blocks to aged care reform: independence from Government and a secure source of funding. It is telling that both the current and the previous Australian Governments rejected each of these in their response to the Royal Commission. A philosophical shift is required that places the people receiving care at the centre of quality and safety regulation. An independent Aged Care Commission with guaranteed funding though a hypothecated Aged Care Levy would, in my view, create the substrate upon which this change in philosophy can flourish.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections of a former Chief Economist on the past 25years of Australian Government aged care policy.\",\"authors\":\"David Cullen\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH25202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety identified two key building blocks to aged care reform: independence from Government and a secure source of funding. It is telling that both the current and the previous Australian Governments rejected each of these in their response to the Royal Commission. A philosophical shift is required that places the people receiving care at the centre of quality and safety regulation. An independent Aged Care Commission with guaranteed funding though a hypothecated Aged Care Levy would, in my view, create the substrate upon which this change in philosophy can flourish.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH25202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH25202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年护理质量和安全皇家委员会确定了老年护理改革的两个关键组成部分:独立于政府和安全的资金来源。很明显,现任和前任澳大利亚政府在对皇家委员会的答复中都拒绝了这些建议。需要转变观念,将接受护理的人置于质量和安全监管的中心。在我看来,一个独立的老年护理委员会,通过抵押的老年护理税来保证资金,将为这种哲学变革的蓬勃发展创造基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflections of a former Chief Economist on the past 25years of Australian Government aged care policy.

The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety identified two key building blocks to aged care reform: independence from Government and a secure source of funding. It is telling that both the current and the previous Australian Governments rejected each of these in their response to the Royal Commission. A philosophical shift is required that places the people receiving care at the centre of quality and safety regulation. An independent Aged Care Commission with guaranteed funding though a hypothecated Aged Care Levy would, in my view, create the substrate upon which this change in philosophy can flourish.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信