学生自我评价录像测试:一项随机交叉研究。

Q2 Dentistry
Camille M Biorn, Rachelle Williams, Cyndee Harmon, Carly Simpson
{"title":"学生自我评价录像测试:一项随机交叉研究。","authors":"Camille M Biorn, Rachelle Williams, Cyndee Harmon, Carly Simpson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> Graduates of dental hygiene programs must acquire competence in critical reasoning by developing proficiency in self-assessment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of video-recorded testing compared to direct observation testing on student self-assessment scores, self-assessment accuracy and student retest scores, and to ascertain which modality was preferred by faculty and students.<b>Methods</b> A randomized crossover AB/BA research design evaluated video-recorded testing compared to traditional, direct observation testing. First year dental hygiene students (n=33) were randomly assigned to an AB or BA sequence for preclinical instrumentation skills testing and were evaluated by faculty (n=13). Student self-assessment test scores, faculty test scores, student accuracy scores, and student/faculty surveys were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and parametric independent samples t-tests (<i>p</i><0.05) were used to analyze the data.<b>Results</b> Mean student self-assessment scores were slightly higher with video testing (93.64%) than with direct observation testing (91.98%). Retest scores were similar between the two testing modalities (video 90.74%; direct observation 93.86%). Mean student accuracy scores were nearly equal with the two modalities (video 93.24%; direct observation 93.1%). There were no statistically significant differences in student accuracy, retest, and self-assessment scores for instrumentation skills testing when comparing the modalities. A majority of students (80%) preferred video testing while all faculty members preferred the direct observation testing modality.<b>Conclusion</b> Students preferred video testing for self-assessment compared to direct observational testing, noting the increased ability to identify and correct mistakes. Faculty acknowledged video-recorded evaluation methods as advantageous in enhancing student self-assessment skills. However, faculty preferred direct observation testing, stating it allowed for a more thorough evaluation of skills. Additional research is needed using high-quality video equipment and longitudinal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":52471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","volume":"99 5","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video-Recorded Testing for Student Self-Assessment: A randomized crossover study.\",\"authors\":\"Camille M Biorn, Rachelle Williams, Cyndee Harmon, Carly Simpson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> Graduates of dental hygiene programs must acquire competence in critical reasoning by developing proficiency in self-assessment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of video-recorded testing compared to direct observation testing on student self-assessment scores, self-assessment accuracy and student retest scores, and to ascertain which modality was preferred by faculty and students.<b>Methods</b> A randomized crossover AB/BA research design evaluated video-recorded testing compared to traditional, direct observation testing. First year dental hygiene students (n=33) were randomly assigned to an AB or BA sequence for preclinical instrumentation skills testing and were evaluated by faculty (n=13). Student self-assessment test scores, faculty test scores, student accuracy scores, and student/faculty surveys were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and parametric independent samples t-tests (<i>p</i><0.05) were used to analyze the data.<b>Results</b> Mean student self-assessment scores were slightly higher with video testing (93.64%) than with direct observation testing (91.98%). Retest scores were similar between the two testing modalities (video 90.74%; direct observation 93.86%). Mean student accuracy scores were nearly equal with the two modalities (video 93.24%; direct observation 93.1%). There were no statistically significant differences in student accuracy, retest, and self-assessment scores for instrumentation skills testing when comparing the modalities. A majority of students (80%) preferred video testing while all faculty members preferred the direct observation testing modality.<b>Conclusion</b> Students preferred video testing for self-assessment compared to direct observational testing, noting the increased ability to identify and correct mistakes. Faculty acknowledged video-recorded evaluation methods as advantageous in enhancing student self-assessment skills. However, faculty preferred direct observation testing, stating it allowed for a more thorough evaluation of skills. Additional research is needed using high-quality video equipment and longitudinal studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association\",\"volume\":\"99 5\",\"pages\":\"29-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的口腔卫生专业的毕业生必须通过发展自我评估的能力来获得批判性推理的能力。本研究的目的是探讨录影测验与直接观察测验在学生自评分数、自评准确性和学生复试分数方面的有效性,并确定教师和学生更倾向于哪种方式。方法采用随机交叉AB/BA研究设计,比较视频记录测试与传统直接观察测试的差异。一年级口腔卫生专业学生(n=33)被随机分配到AB或BA序列进行临床前器械技能测试,并由教师评估(n=13)。评估了学生自我评估测试分数、教师测试分数、学生准确性分数和学生/教师调查。结果视频检验的学生自评平均分(93.64%)略高于直接观察检验的学生自评平均分(91.98%)。两种测试方式的重测得分相近(视频90.74%,直接观察93.86%)。两种方式的学生平均正确率得分几乎相等(视频93.24%,直接观察93.1%)。比较两种方法时,学生仪器技能测试的准确性、重测和自我评估得分没有统计学上的显著差异。大多数学生(80%)喜欢视频测试,而所有教师都喜欢直接观察测试方式。结论与直接观察测试相比,学生更喜欢视频测试进行自我评估,注意到识别和纠正错误的能力提高。学院认为录影评核方法有助提高学生的自我评核能力。然而,教师们更喜欢直接观察测试,称这可以更彻底地评估技能。需要使用高质量录像设备和纵向研究进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Video-Recorded Testing for Student Self-Assessment: A randomized crossover study.

Purpose Graduates of dental hygiene programs must acquire competence in critical reasoning by developing proficiency in self-assessment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of video-recorded testing compared to direct observation testing on student self-assessment scores, self-assessment accuracy and student retest scores, and to ascertain which modality was preferred by faculty and students.Methods A randomized crossover AB/BA research design evaluated video-recorded testing compared to traditional, direct observation testing. First year dental hygiene students (n=33) were randomly assigned to an AB or BA sequence for preclinical instrumentation skills testing and were evaluated by faculty (n=13). Student self-assessment test scores, faculty test scores, student accuracy scores, and student/faculty surveys were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and parametric independent samples t-tests (p<0.05) were used to analyze the data.Results Mean student self-assessment scores were slightly higher with video testing (93.64%) than with direct observation testing (91.98%). Retest scores were similar between the two testing modalities (video 90.74%; direct observation 93.86%). Mean student accuracy scores were nearly equal with the two modalities (video 93.24%; direct observation 93.1%). There were no statistically significant differences in student accuracy, retest, and self-assessment scores for instrumentation skills testing when comparing the modalities. A majority of students (80%) preferred video testing while all faculty members preferred the direct observation testing modality.Conclusion Students preferred video testing for self-assessment compared to direct observational testing, noting the increased ability to identify and correct mistakes. Faculty acknowledged video-recorded evaluation methods as advantageous in enhancing student self-assessment skills. However, faculty preferred direct observation testing, stating it allowed for a more thorough evaluation of skills. Additional research is needed using high-quality video equipment and longitudinal studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Hygiene is the refereed, scientific publication of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association. It promotes the publication of original research related to the practice and education of dental hygiene. It supports the development and dissemination of a dental hygiene body of knowledge through scientific inquiry in basic, applied, and clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信