家庭照顾者对医疗复杂性儿童服务的经验:系统回顾与质性证据综合。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Bethan Page, Pru Holder, Katie Doidge, Lisa Hinton, Lorna K. Fraser
{"title":"家庭照顾者对医疗复杂性儿童服务的经验:系统回顾与质性证据综合。","authors":"Bethan Page,&nbsp;Pru Holder,&nbsp;Katie Doidge,&nbsp;Lisa Hinton,&nbsp;Lorna K. Fraser","doi":"10.1111/hex.70452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Many high-income countries are seeking to adapt services to meet the needs of the growing population of children with medical complexity and their families but concerns have been raised about the quality of this care. To understand family caregivers' experiences of services and identify priorities for improvement we need to synthesise research about families' experiences of services for children with medical complexity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To systematically identify and synthesise the qualitative evidence of family caregivers' experiences of health, care and education services for children with medical complexity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and ERIC from January 2011 to March 2024. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and data richness and synthesized using thematic synthesis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-one studies met the eligibility criteria. A purposive sample of 29 studies was taken, selecting good-quality papers with rich data. These studies described the experience of 524 family caregivers and focused mostly on hospital care and care in the home. No studies were identified that focused specifically on family caregivers' experiences of education or social care services. Most studies were from the United States and Canada. The overarching theme was ‘concern for child's safety’ with three subthemes: ‘interactions with professionals’, ‘caring for the whole family’ and ‘system organisation’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Family caregivers' priority is maintaining their child's safety across all settings of care. Fragmented systems and difficulties trusting professionals exacerbate parents' stress and concern for their child's safety. To keep the child safe and well, services need to address the needs of the whole family (e.g., parental sleep and mental health, finances, housing). Future research is needed to address the gap in research on social care services and education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient and Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Emerging findings of the review were discussed in a 2-h workshop with six parents of children with medical complexity. The parents inputted into the development of the analytical themes and helped to shape the findings of the review.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Caregivers' Experiences of Services for Children With Medical Complexity: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Bethan Page,&nbsp;Pru Holder,&nbsp;Katie Doidge,&nbsp;Lisa Hinton,&nbsp;Lorna K. Fraser\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Many high-income countries are seeking to adapt services to meet the needs of the growing population of children with medical complexity and their families but concerns have been raised about the quality of this care. To understand family caregivers' experiences of services and identify priorities for improvement we need to synthesise research about families' experiences of services for children with medical complexity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To systematically identify and synthesise the qualitative evidence of family caregivers' experiences of health, care and education services for children with medical complexity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and ERIC from January 2011 to March 2024. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and data richness and synthesized using thematic synthesis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventy-one studies met the eligibility criteria. A purposive sample of 29 studies was taken, selecting good-quality papers with rich data. These studies described the experience of 524 family caregivers and focused mostly on hospital care and care in the home. No studies were identified that focused specifically on family caregivers' experiences of education or social care services. Most studies were from the United States and Canada. The overarching theme was ‘concern for child's safety’ with three subthemes: ‘interactions with professionals’, ‘caring for the whole family’ and ‘system organisation’.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Family caregivers' priority is maintaining their child's safety across all settings of care. Fragmented systems and difficulties trusting professionals exacerbate parents' stress and concern for their child's safety. To keep the child safe and well, services need to address the needs of the whole family (e.g., parental sleep and mental health, finances, housing). Future research is needed to address the gap in research on social care services and education.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient and Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>Emerging findings of the review were discussed in a 2-h workshop with six parents of children with medical complexity. The parents inputted into the development of the analytical themes and helped to shape the findings of the review.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70452\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多高收入国家正在设法调整服务,以满足日益增多的医疗复杂性儿童及其家庭的需求,但人们对这种护理的质量提出了关切。为了了解家庭照顾者的服务经验并确定改进的优先事项,我们需要综合研究家庭对医疗复杂性儿童的服务经验。目的:系统地识别和综合家庭照顾者对医疗复杂性儿童的健康、护理和教育服务经验的定性证据。方法:2011年1月~ 2024年3月在MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycINFO和ERIC中进行系统检索。对研究的方法质量和数据丰富程度进行了评估,并利用专题综合进行了综合。结果:71项研究符合入选标准。有目的的29个研究样本,选择高质量的论文和丰富的数据。这些研究描述了524名家庭照顾者的经历,主要关注医院护理和家庭护理。没有研究被确定专门关注家庭照顾者的教育或社会照顾服务的经验。大多数研究来自美国和加拿大。最重要的主题是“关注儿童安全”,还有三个副主题:“与专业人士的互动”、“照顾整个家庭”和“系统组织”。结论:家庭照顾者的首要任务是在所有护理环境中维护孩子的安全。支离破碎的系统和难以信任专业人员加剧了父母的压力和对孩子安全的担忧。为了保证儿童的安全和健康,服务需要满足整个家庭的需要(例如,父母的睡眠和心理健康、财务、住房)。未来的研究需要解决社会关怀服务和教育研究的差距。患者和公众贡献:在与六位患有复杂医疗问题儿童的父母举行的为期2小时的研讨会上,讨论了本综述的新发现。家长们参与了分析主题的发展,并帮助形成了审查的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Family Caregivers' Experiences of Services for Children With Medical Complexity: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Family Caregivers' Experiences of Services for Children With Medical Complexity: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Background

Many high-income countries are seeking to adapt services to meet the needs of the growing population of children with medical complexity and their families but concerns have been raised about the quality of this care. To understand family caregivers' experiences of services and identify priorities for improvement we need to synthesise research about families' experiences of services for children with medical complexity.

Objectives

To systematically identify and synthesise the qualitative evidence of family caregivers' experiences of health, care and education services for children with medical complexity.

Methods

Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and ERIC from January 2011 to March 2024. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and data richness and synthesized using thematic synthesis.

Results

Seventy-one studies met the eligibility criteria. A purposive sample of 29 studies was taken, selecting good-quality papers with rich data. These studies described the experience of 524 family caregivers and focused mostly on hospital care and care in the home. No studies were identified that focused specifically on family caregivers' experiences of education or social care services. Most studies were from the United States and Canada. The overarching theme was ‘concern for child's safety’ with three subthemes: ‘interactions with professionals’, ‘caring for the whole family’ and ‘system organisation’.

Conclusions

Family caregivers' priority is maintaining their child's safety across all settings of care. Fragmented systems and difficulties trusting professionals exacerbate parents' stress and concern for their child's safety. To keep the child safe and well, services need to address the needs of the whole family (e.g., parental sleep and mental health, finances, housing). Future research is needed to address the gap in research on social care services and education.

Patient and Public Contribution

Emerging findings of the review were discussed in a 2-h workshop with six parents of children with medical complexity. The parents inputted into the development of the analytical themes and helped to shape the findings of the review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信