改良钡餐吞咽研究中食道潴留:对真实食道病理的有限预测价值。

Sabrina Lauren Chen, Diana Partida, Connie Wang, Priya Kathpalia
{"title":"改良钡餐吞咽研究中食道潴留:对真实食道病理的有限预测价值。","authors":"Sabrina Lauren Chen, Diana Partida, Connie Wang, Priya Kathpalia","doi":"10.4291/wjgp.v16.i3.108900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysphagia is a prevalent condition affecting over 15 million adults in the United States, posing serious health risks and contributing to rising healthcare costs. Early evaluation, often initiated by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) using the modified barium swallow study (MBSS), is essential to identify underlying causes. Although SLPs have traditionally focused on oropharyngeal swallowing, emerging guidelines now support esophageal visualization during MBSS. However, standardized practices and consensus remain limited. This study hypothesizes that incidental esophageal retention observed on MBSS do not correlate with clinically relevant esophageal dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess whether abnormal esophageal retention on MBSS predicts clinically relevant esophageal disease based on subsequent diagnostic studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with abnormal MBSS findings who were referred to gastroenterology (GI) for dysphagia between September 2017 and August 2023. Patients with prior foregut/head/neck surgery or without esophageal phase evaluation on MBSS were excluded. Baseline characteristics, MBSS findings and results from subsequent esophageal studies within one year of MBSS were analyzed. Patient profiles were evaluated by two raters to determine whether subjects had confirmed esophageal pathology. <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> tests compared MBSS findings with esophageal study abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 199 referrals to GI with abnormal MBSS findings, 122 patients had subsequent esophageal studies or GI clinic follow-up. Esophagram was performed in 64 patients, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in 53 patients, manometry in 31 patients, and anti-reflux monitoring in 11 patients. Confirmed esophageal pathology was identified in 27 patients. No significant association was observed between esophageal retention on MBSS and confirmed esophageal pathology (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.30, <i>P</i> value = 0.58) or with abnormal pathology on EGD, esophagram, manometry or anti-reflux testing in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Esophageal retention on MBSS does not reliably predict esophageal pathology and is not an effective standalone screening tool for esophageal dysphagia, though it may offer limited theoretical insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":68755,"journal":{"name":"世界胃肠病理生理学杂志(电子版)(英文版)","volume":"16 3","pages":"108900"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Esophageal retention on modified barium swallow study: Limited predictive value for true esophageal pathology.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Lauren Chen, Diana Partida, Connie Wang, Priya Kathpalia\",\"doi\":\"10.4291/wjgp.v16.i3.108900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysphagia is a prevalent condition affecting over 15 million adults in the United States, posing serious health risks and contributing to rising healthcare costs. Early evaluation, often initiated by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) using the modified barium swallow study (MBSS), is essential to identify underlying causes. Although SLPs have traditionally focused on oropharyngeal swallowing, emerging guidelines now support esophageal visualization during MBSS. However, standardized practices and consensus remain limited. This study hypothesizes that incidental esophageal retention observed on MBSS do not correlate with clinically relevant esophageal dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess whether abnormal esophageal retention on MBSS predicts clinically relevant esophageal disease based on subsequent diagnostic studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with abnormal MBSS findings who were referred to gastroenterology (GI) for dysphagia between September 2017 and August 2023. Patients with prior foregut/head/neck surgery or without esophageal phase evaluation on MBSS were excluded. Baseline characteristics, MBSS findings and results from subsequent esophageal studies within one year of MBSS were analyzed. Patient profiles were evaluated by two raters to determine whether subjects had confirmed esophageal pathology. <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> tests compared MBSS findings with esophageal study abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 199 referrals to GI with abnormal MBSS findings, 122 patients had subsequent esophageal studies or GI clinic follow-up. Esophagram was performed in 64 patients, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in 53 patients, manometry in 31 patients, and anti-reflux monitoring in 11 patients. Confirmed esophageal pathology was identified in 27 patients. No significant association was observed between esophageal retention on MBSS and confirmed esophageal pathology (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.30, <i>P</i> value = 0.58) or with abnormal pathology on EGD, esophagram, manometry or anti-reflux testing in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Esophageal retention on MBSS does not reliably predict esophageal pathology and is not an effective standalone screening tool for esophageal dysphagia, though it may offer limited theoretical insights.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":68755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界胃肠病理生理学杂志(电子版)(英文版)\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"108900\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476694/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界胃肠病理生理学杂志(电子版)(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v16.i3.108900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界胃肠病理生理学杂志(电子版)(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v16.i3.108900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,吞咽困难是一种影响超过1500万成年人的普遍疾病,造成严重的健康风险,并导致医疗成本上升。早期的评估,通常由语言病理学家(slp)使用改良的钡吞咽研究(MBSS)发起,对于确定潜在的原因是必不可少的。虽然slp传统上侧重于口咽吞咽,但新兴的指南现在支持MBSS期间的食管可视化。然而,标准化的做法和共识仍然有限。本研究假设在MBSS中观察到的偶然食道潴留与临床相关的食道吞咽困难无关。目的:在后续诊断研究的基础上,评估MBSS患者异常食管潴留是否能预测临床相关的食管疾病。方法:我们对2017年9月至2023年8月期间因吞咽困难而转介胃肠病学(GI)的MBSS异常患者进行了回顾性队列研究。既往有前肠/头颈部手术或未对MBSS进行食管期评估的患者被排除在外。我们分析了基线特征、MBSS的发现以及随后一年内的食道研究结果。两名评分员对患者资料进行评估,以确定受试者是否证实有食管病理。χ 2检验比较MBSS结果与食管检查异常。结果:199例MBSS异常转介胃肠道患者中,122例患者随后进行了食管检查或胃肠道临床随访。64例患者进行食管造影,53例患者进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查,31例患者进行测压,11例患者进行抗反流监测。27例患者确认有食管病理。在非校正和校正分析中,MBSS患者的食管潴留与确诊的食管病理(χ 2 = 0.30, P值= 0.58)或与EGD、食管造影、测压或抗反流试验的异常病理均无显著相关性。结论:MBSS的食管潴留不能可靠地预测食管病理,也不是一种有效的食管吞咽困难的独立筛查工具,尽管它可能提供有限的理论见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Esophageal retention on modified barium swallow study: Limited predictive value for true esophageal pathology.

Esophageal retention on modified barium swallow study: Limited predictive value for true esophageal pathology.

Background: Dysphagia is a prevalent condition affecting over 15 million adults in the United States, posing serious health risks and contributing to rising healthcare costs. Early evaluation, often initiated by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) using the modified barium swallow study (MBSS), is essential to identify underlying causes. Although SLPs have traditionally focused on oropharyngeal swallowing, emerging guidelines now support esophageal visualization during MBSS. However, standardized practices and consensus remain limited. This study hypothesizes that incidental esophageal retention observed on MBSS do not correlate with clinically relevant esophageal dysphagia.

Aim: To assess whether abnormal esophageal retention on MBSS predicts clinically relevant esophageal disease based on subsequent diagnostic studies.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with abnormal MBSS findings who were referred to gastroenterology (GI) for dysphagia between September 2017 and August 2023. Patients with prior foregut/head/neck surgery or without esophageal phase evaluation on MBSS were excluded. Baseline characteristics, MBSS findings and results from subsequent esophageal studies within one year of MBSS were analyzed. Patient profiles were evaluated by two raters to determine whether subjects had confirmed esophageal pathology. χ 2 tests compared MBSS findings with esophageal study abnormalities.

Results: Of 199 referrals to GI with abnormal MBSS findings, 122 patients had subsequent esophageal studies or GI clinic follow-up. Esophagram was performed in 64 patients, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in 53 patients, manometry in 31 patients, and anti-reflux monitoring in 11 patients. Confirmed esophageal pathology was identified in 27 patients. No significant association was observed between esophageal retention on MBSS and confirmed esophageal pathology (χ 2 = 0.30, P value = 0.58) or with abnormal pathology on EGD, esophagram, manometry or anti-reflux testing in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses.

Conclusion: Esophageal retention on MBSS does not reliably predict esophageal pathology and is not an effective standalone screening tool for esophageal dysphagia, though it may offer limited theoretical insights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
336
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信