Joni Williams Splett, Nicholas A Gage, Erin A Chaparro, Aaron R Lyon, Melanie A Sonsteng-Person, Zoë Z Alfonso, Colleen A Halliday
{"title":"小学教师评定普遍心理健康筛查的差异项目功能。","authors":"Joni Williams Splett, Nicholas A Gage, Erin A Chaparro, Aaron R Lyon, Melanie A Sonsteng-Person, Zoë Z Alfonso, Colleen A Halliday","doi":"10.1037/spq0000712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recommendations, resources, and policy for schools to implement a continuum or multitiered system of prevention and intervention supports (MTSS) for academic, behavioral, and mental health functioning continue to increase. Accurate and meaningful data, including universal screening, are a central component of MTSS and must perform consistently across racially and ethnically diverse student groups. The present study examined scores from the Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System-Second Edition, a universal mental health screening tool used widely in large, racially diverse school districts, as a function of student race to identify any differential functioning in the assessment. Participants included 1,168 students (68% Black and 32% White) rated by their 4<sup>th</sup>- or 5<sup>th</sup>-grade teacher across nine elementary schools in a partnering school district in the Southeastern United States. Results from an item response theory approach using differential item functioning revealed several items with differential item functioning by student race on subscales included in the measure's Behavioral Concerns Scale and Adaptive Scale. In addition, differential item functioning items were found to impact students' risk status in these domains, specifically the Negative Affect and Social subscales, as well as all items on Academic Functioning performing differently between groups. These findings are problematic for using the Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System-Second Edition as a universal mental health screening assessment in the MTSS of a racially diverse school or district. Future research should explore other facets of the Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System-Second Edition and similar screening instruments that may be driving differential ratings including improvements to the instrument and efforts to mitigate misidentification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74763,"journal":{"name":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential item functioning of teacher-rated universal mental health screening in elementary schools.\",\"authors\":\"Joni Williams Splett, Nicholas A Gage, Erin A Chaparro, Aaron R Lyon, Melanie A Sonsteng-Person, Zoë Z Alfonso, Colleen A Halliday\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/spq0000712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recommendations, resources, and policy for schools to implement a continuum or multitiered system of prevention and intervention supports (MTSS) for academic, behavioral, and mental health functioning continue to increase. Accurate and meaningful data, including universal screening, are a central component of MTSS and must perform consistently across racially and ethnically diverse student groups. The present study examined scores from the Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System-Second Edition, a universal mental health screening tool used widely in large, racially diverse school districts, as a function of student race to identify any differential functioning in the assessment. Participants included 1,168 students (68% Black and 32% White) rated by their 4<sup>th</sup>- or 5<sup>th</sup>-grade teacher across nine elementary schools in a partnering school district in the Southeastern United States. Results from an item response theory approach using differential item functioning revealed several items with differential item functioning by student race on subscales included in the measure's Behavioral Concerns Scale and Adaptive Scale. In addition, differential item functioning items were found to impact students' risk status in these domains, specifically the Negative Affect and Social subscales, as well as all items on Academic Functioning performing differently between groups. These findings are problematic for using the Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System-Second Edition as a universal mental health screening assessment in the MTSS of a racially diverse school or district. Future research should explore other facets of the Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System-Second Edition and similar screening instruments that may be driving differential ratings including improvements to the instrument and efforts to mitigate misidentification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
针对学校在学业、行为和心理健康功能方面实施连续或多层预防和干预支持(MTSS)系统的建议、资源和政策继续增加。准确和有意义的数据,包括普遍筛查,是MTSS的核心组成部分,必须在不同种族和民族的学生群体中保持一致。本研究检查了行为干预监测评估系统第二版的分数,这是一种普遍的心理健康筛查工具,广泛用于大型,种族多样化的学区,作为学生种族的功能,以识别评估中的任何差异功能。参与者包括1168名学生(68%是黑人,32%是白人),他们来自美国东南部一个合作学区的九所小学,由他们的四年级或五年级老师评定。使用差异项目功能的项目反应理论方法的结果显示,在测量的行为关注量表和适应量表的子量表中,有几个项目具有学生种族的差异项目功能。此外,差异项目功能项目影响学生在这些领域的风险状况,特别是负面影响和社会子量表,以及学业功能的所有项目在组间表现不同。这些发现对于使用行为干预监测评估系统第二版作为种族多元化学校或地区MTSS的普遍心理健康筛查评估存在问题。未来的研究应该探索行为干预监测评估系统(第二版)的其他方面,以及可能推动差异评级的类似筛选工具,包括对工具的改进和减少错误识别的努力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Differential item functioning of teacher-rated universal mental health screening in elementary schools.
Recommendations, resources, and policy for schools to implement a continuum or multitiered system of prevention and intervention supports (MTSS) for academic, behavioral, and mental health functioning continue to increase. Accurate and meaningful data, including universal screening, are a central component of MTSS and must perform consistently across racially and ethnically diverse student groups. The present study examined scores from the Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System-Second Edition, a universal mental health screening tool used widely in large, racially diverse school districts, as a function of student race to identify any differential functioning in the assessment. Participants included 1,168 students (68% Black and 32% White) rated by their 4th- or 5th-grade teacher across nine elementary schools in a partnering school district in the Southeastern United States. Results from an item response theory approach using differential item functioning revealed several items with differential item functioning by student race on subscales included in the measure's Behavioral Concerns Scale and Adaptive Scale. In addition, differential item functioning items were found to impact students' risk status in these domains, specifically the Negative Affect and Social subscales, as well as all items on Academic Functioning performing differently between groups. These findings are problematic for using the Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System-Second Edition as a universal mental health screening assessment in the MTSS of a racially diverse school or district. Future research should explore other facets of the Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System-Second Edition and similar screening instruments that may be driving differential ratings including improvements to the instrument and efforts to mitigate misidentification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).