基于眼动追踪技术的视觉扫描训练对脑卒中后单侧空间忽视的影响。

IF 1.2 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
JinQin Zhang, XinPing Wang, FuBiao Huang, WenShuai Wang, YuQi Li, Min Zhang, FeiRu Chen, Bin Gu, Hao Yang, Yu Wei, WanNing Yang
{"title":"基于眼动追踪技术的视觉扫描训练对脑卒中后单侧空间忽视的影响。","authors":"JinQin Zhang, XinPing Wang, FuBiao Huang, WenShuai Wang, YuQi Li, Min Zhang, FeiRu Chen, Bin Gu, Hao Yang, Yu Wei, WanNing Yang","doi":"10.3791/68331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore the effect of eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training on recovery from unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect (n = 48) from Beijing Bo'ai Hospital were recruited and randomly divided into an eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training group (n = 24) and a conventional visual scanning training group (n = 24). The training regimen was 30 min/session, 1 session/day, and 5 days/week. The experimental group received visual scanning training via eye-tracking technology for 15 min and conventional unilateral spatial neglect training for 15 min. The control group received conventional unilateral spatial neglect training for 30 min. Both groups received conventional drug therapy and underwent conventional occupational rehabilitation. The Behaviour Inattention Test-Conventional Group (BIT-C), the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS), and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) were used to assess recovery from unilateral spatial neglect and to evaluate activities of daily living (ADLs) before and after treatment. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to assess cognitive function before and after treatment. The results suggested that eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training is more effective than conventional training in terms of alleviating unilateral spatial neglect and reducing the severity of neglect in ADLs. However, compared with conventional training, eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training did not significantly increase ADL or MMSE scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":48787,"journal":{"name":"Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments","volume":" 223","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Eye-Tracking Technology-Based Visual Scanning Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect after Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"JinQin Zhang, XinPing Wang, FuBiao Huang, WenShuai Wang, YuQi Li, Min Zhang, FeiRu Chen, Bin Gu, Hao Yang, Yu Wei, WanNing Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.3791/68331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to explore the effect of eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training on recovery from unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect (n = 48) from Beijing Bo'ai Hospital were recruited and randomly divided into an eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training group (n = 24) and a conventional visual scanning training group (n = 24). The training regimen was 30 min/session, 1 session/day, and 5 days/week. The experimental group received visual scanning training via eye-tracking technology for 15 min and conventional unilateral spatial neglect training for 15 min. The control group received conventional unilateral spatial neglect training for 30 min. Both groups received conventional drug therapy and underwent conventional occupational rehabilitation. The Behaviour Inattention Test-Conventional Group (BIT-C), the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS), and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) were used to assess recovery from unilateral spatial neglect and to evaluate activities of daily living (ADLs) before and after treatment. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to assess cognitive function before and after treatment. The results suggested that eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training is more effective than conventional training in terms of alleviating unilateral spatial neglect and reducing the severity of neglect in ADLs. However, compared with conventional training, eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training did not significantly increase ADL or MMSE scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments\",\"volume\":\" 223\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3791/68331\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3791/68331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨基于眼动追踪技术的视觉扫描训练对脑卒中后单侧空间忽视的康复效果。选取北京博爱医院卒中单侧空间忽视患者48例,随机分为基于眼动追踪技术的视觉扫描训练组(n = 24)和常规视觉扫描训练组(n = 24)。训练方案为30分钟/次,1次/天,5天/周。实验组接受眼动追踪技术视觉扫描训练15 min,常规单侧空间忽视训练15 min。对照组接受常规单侧空间忽视训练30分钟。两组均接受常规药物治疗和常规职业康复治疗。采用行为不注意测试-常规组(BIT-C)、Catherine Bergego量表(CBS)和改良Barthel指数(MBI)评估治疗前后单侧空间忽视的恢复情况和日常生活活动(ADLs)。使用简易精神状态检查(MMSE)评估治疗前后的认知功能。结果表明,基于眼动追踪技术的视觉扫描训练在缓解adl单侧空间忽视和降低忽视程度方面比传统训练更有效。然而,与常规训练相比,基于眼动追踪技术的视觉扫描训练并没有显著提高ADL和MMSE得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Eye-Tracking Technology-Based Visual Scanning Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect after Stroke.

This study aimed to explore the effect of eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training on recovery from unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect (n = 48) from Beijing Bo'ai Hospital were recruited and randomly divided into an eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training group (n = 24) and a conventional visual scanning training group (n = 24). The training regimen was 30 min/session, 1 session/day, and 5 days/week. The experimental group received visual scanning training via eye-tracking technology for 15 min and conventional unilateral spatial neglect training for 15 min. The control group received conventional unilateral spatial neglect training for 30 min. Both groups received conventional drug therapy and underwent conventional occupational rehabilitation. The Behaviour Inattention Test-Conventional Group (BIT-C), the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS), and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) were used to assess recovery from unilateral spatial neglect and to evaluate activities of daily living (ADLs) before and after treatment. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to assess cognitive function before and after treatment. The results suggested that eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training is more effective than conventional training in terms of alleviating unilateral spatial neglect and reducing the severity of neglect in ADLs. However, compared with conventional training, eye-tracking technology-based visual scanning training did not significantly increase ADL or MMSE scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments
Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
992
期刊介绍: JoVE, the Journal of Visualized Experiments, is the world''s first peer reviewed scientific video journal. Established in 2006, JoVE is devoted to publishing scientific research in a visual format to help researchers overcome two of the biggest challenges facing the scientific research community today; poor reproducibility and the time and labor intensive nature of learning new experimental techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信