高危选择性PCI的机械循环支持:PROTECT IV试验的基本原理和设计。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Norman Mangner, Samin K Sharma, Chris O'Connor, Amir Kaki, George D Dangas, Jeffrey W Moses, Ehtisham Mahmud, Giuseppe Tarantini, Stephan Achenbach, Stuart J Pocock, William W O'Neill, Cindy L Grines, Alexandra J Lansky, Jason R Wollmuth, Jagat Narula, Dimitrios I Karmpaliotis, Haroon A Faraz, Mir B Basir, Aditya S Bharadwaj, Ziad A Ali, Chuck Simonton, Seth D Bilazarian, Navin K Kapur, Roberta C Chapman, Dana Bentley, Jeffrey J Popma, Akiko Maehara, Stephan Windecker, Gregg W Stone
{"title":"高危选择性PCI的机械循环支持:PROTECT IV试验的基本原理和设计。","authors":"Norman Mangner, Samin K Sharma, Chris O'Connor, Amir Kaki, George D Dangas, Jeffrey W Moses, Ehtisham Mahmud, Giuseppe Tarantini, Stephan Achenbach, Stuart J Pocock, William W O'Neill, Cindy L Grines, Alexandra J Lansky, Jason R Wollmuth, Jagat Narula, Dimitrios I Karmpaliotis, Haroon A Faraz, Mir B Basir, Aditya S Bharadwaj, Ziad A Ali, Chuck Simonton, Seth D Bilazarian, Navin K Kapur, Roberta C Chapman, Dana Bentley, Jeffrey J Popma, Akiko Maehara, Stephan Windecker, Gregg W Stone","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves long-term mortality in HFrEF. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often performed as an alternative to CABG in patients at high surgical risk. However, in patients with HFrEF and limited myocardial reserve, PCI may result in haemodynamic instability, increasing risk and precluding optimal revascularisation. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) during high-risk PCI may enhance haemodynamic stability during the procedure and enable complete revascularisation. We thus performed the PROTECT IV trial to determine whether PCI with routine use of the Impella CP microaxial flow pump improves early and late outcomes in patients with HFrEF and complex CAD compared with PCI with or without use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). PROTECT IV is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, parallel-controlled, open-label, superiority trial with an adaptive design. Patients with complex CAD and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (n=1,252) deemed at excessive surgical risk for bypass grafting by the Heart Team will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to PCI with Impella CP versus PCI with or without an IABP. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, unplanned clinically driven revascularisation, durable left ventricular assist device implant or heart transplant, or other hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes at 3-year follow-up, with at least 1-year follow-up in all patients. Prespecified substudies will evaluate the impact of MCS on renal function, the procedural role of right heart catheterisation, and the utility of myocardial viability assessment. The PROTECT IV trial will determine whether routine MCS with Impella CP during high-risk PCI improves the prognosis of patients with complex CAD and HFrEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical circulatory support in high-risk elective PCI: rationale and design of the PROTECT IV trial.\",\"authors\":\"Norman Mangner, Samin K Sharma, Chris O'Connor, Amir Kaki, George D Dangas, Jeffrey W Moses, Ehtisham Mahmud, Giuseppe Tarantini, Stephan Achenbach, Stuart J Pocock, William W O'Neill, Cindy L Grines, Alexandra J Lansky, Jason R Wollmuth, Jagat Narula, Dimitrios I Karmpaliotis, Haroon A Faraz, Mir B Basir, Aditya S Bharadwaj, Ziad A Ali, Chuck Simonton, Seth D Bilazarian, Navin K Kapur, Roberta C Chapman, Dana Bentley, Jeffrey J Popma, Akiko Maehara, Stephan Windecker, Gregg W Stone\",\"doi\":\"10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves long-term mortality in HFrEF. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often performed as an alternative to CABG in patients at high surgical risk. However, in patients with HFrEF and limited myocardial reserve, PCI may result in haemodynamic instability, increasing risk and precluding optimal revascularisation. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) during high-risk PCI may enhance haemodynamic stability during the procedure and enable complete revascularisation. We thus performed the PROTECT IV trial to determine whether PCI with routine use of the Impella CP microaxial flow pump improves early and late outcomes in patients with HFrEF and complex CAD compared with PCI with or without use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). PROTECT IV is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, parallel-controlled, open-label, superiority trial with an adaptive design. Patients with complex CAD and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (n=1,252) deemed at excessive surgical risk for bypass grafting by the Heart Team will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to PCI with Impella CP versus PCI with or without an IABP. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, unplanned clinically driven revascularisation, durable left ventricular assist device implant or heart transplant, or other hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes at 3-year follow-up, with at least 1-year follow-up in all patients. Prespecified substudies will evaluate the impact of MCS on renal function, the procedural role of right heart catheterisation, and the utility of myocardial viability assessment. The PROTECT IV trial will determine whether routine MCS with Impella CP during high-risk PCI improves the prognosis of patients with complex CAD and HFrEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurointervention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurointervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00486\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00486","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是导致心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的主要原因。冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)可改善HFrEF患者的长期死亡率。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)通常作为CABG的替代方案,用于手术风险高的患者。然而,对于HFrEF和心肌储备有限的患者,PCI可能导致血流动力学不稳定,增加风险并妨碍最佳血运重建。在高风险PCI手术中,机械循环支持(MCS)可以提高手术过程中的血流动力学稳定性,并实现完全的血运重建。因此,我们进行了PROTECT IV试验,以确定与使用或不使用主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)的PCI相比,常规使用Impella CP微轴流泵的PCI是否能改善HFrEF和复杂CAD患者的早期和晚期预后。PROTECT IV是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、平行对照、开放标签、自适应设计的优势试验。复杂CAD和左心室射血分数≤40% (n=1,252)的患者被心脏小组认为有过高的搭桥手术风险,将按1:1的比例随机分配到PCI伴Impella CP与伴或不伴IABP的PCI。主要终点为全因死亡、中风、心肌梗死、计划外临床驱动的血运重建术、持久的左心室辅助装置植入或心脏移植,或其他心血管原因的住院治疗,随访3年,所有患者至少随访1年。预先指定的亚研究将评估MCS对肾功能的影响,右心导管插入术的程序作用,以及心肌活力评估的效用。PROTECT IV试验将确定高风险PCI期间常规MCS与Impella CP是否能改善复杂CAD和HFrEF患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical circulatory support in high-risk elective PCI: rationale and design of the PROTECT IV trial.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves long-term mortality in HFrEF. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often performed as an alternative to CABG in patients at high surgical risk. However, in patients with HFrEF and limited myocardial reserve, PCI may result in haemodynamic instability, increasing risk and precluding optimal revascularisation. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) during high-risk PCI may enhance haemodynamic stability during the procedure and enable complete revascularisation. We thus performed the PROTECT IV trial to determine whether PCI with routine use of the Impella CP microaxial flow pump improves early and late outcomes in patients with HFrEF and complex CAD compared with PCI with or without use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). PROTECT IV is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, parallel-controlled, open-label, superiority trial with an adaptive design. Patients with complex CAD and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (n=1,252) deemed at excessive surgical risk for bypass grafting by the Heart Team will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to PCI with Impella CP versus PCI with or without an IABP. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, unplanned clinically driven revascularisation, durable left ventricular assist device implant or heart transplant, or other hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes at 3-year follow-up, with at least 1-year follow-up in all patients. Prespecified substudies will evaluate the impact of MCS on renal function, the procedural role of right heart catheterisation, and the utility of myocardial viability assessment. The PROTECT IV trial will determine whether routine MCS with Impella CP during high-risk PCI improves the prognosis of patients with complex CAD and HFrEF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信