急诊腹部手术分类的实施:倾向性评分加权前后研究。

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Stéphane Bar, Jean-Marc Regimbeau, David Wang, Hervé Dupont, Osama Abou Arab
{"title":"急诊腹部手术分类的实施:倾向性评分加权前后研究。","authors":"Stéphane Bar, Jean-Marc Regimbeau, David Wang, Hervé Dupont, Osama Abou Arab","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. A structured classification system for emergency surgery may help prioritize cases more effectively, reducing delays to the operating room and postoperative complications. This study evaluates the impact of a locally implemented classification for emergency abdominal surgery on postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A before-and-after study was conducted in a University Hospital and included patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery over two 6-month periods: before (September 2019 to March 2020) and after (June 2023 to December 2023) the implementation of a surgical emergency classification. The classification, developed by a panel of local experts, assigned an ideal time to surgery (iTTS) based on five urgency grades. Propensity score-weighted analysis was used to adjust for confounding factors. The endpoint was the occurrence of major postoperative complications within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 438 patients were analyzed (219 before and 219 after implementation). Excess iTTS measured by the actual time to surgery (aTTS)/iTTS ratio and postoperative complications (respiratory, infectious, digestive, cardiac) as well as acute kidney injury were significantly lower in the post-implementation group (p <  0.05). After inverse probability weighting (IPW), the risk of postoperative complications was significantly associated with the implementation of classification, with a relative risk of 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19-0.85], P < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that the implementation of a classification of emergency abdominal surgery could reduce the rate of postoperative complications probably by reducing the delay to surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101608"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of an emergency abdominal surgery classification: a propensity score-weighted before-after study.\",\"authors\":\"Stéphane Bar, Jean-Marc Regimbeau, David Wang, Hervé Dupont, Osama Abou Arab\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. A structured classification system for emergency surgery may help prioritize cases more effectively, reducing delays to the operating room and postoperative complications. This study evaluates the impact of a locally implemented classification for emergency abdominal surgery on postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A before-and-after study was conducted in a University Hospital and included patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery over two 6-month periods: before (September 2019 to March 2020) and after (June 2023 to December 2023) the implementation of a surgical emergency classification. The classification, developed by a panel of local experts, assigned an ideal time to surgery (iTTS) based on five urgency grades. Propensity score-weighted analysis was used to adjust for confounding factors. The endpoint was the occurrence of major postoperative complications within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 438 patients were analyzed (219 before and 219 after implementation). Excess iTTS measured by the actual time to surgery (aTTS)/iTTS ratio and postoperative complications (respiratory, infectious, digestive, cardiac) as well as acute kidney injury were significantly lower in the post-implementation group (p <  0.05). After inverse probability weighting (IPW), the risk of postoperative complications was significantly associated with the implementation of classification, with a relative risk of 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19-0.85], P < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that the implementation of a classification of emergency abdominal surgery could reduce the rate of postoperative complications probably by reducing the delay to surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101608\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊腹部手术与术后高发病率和死亡率相关。一个结构化的急诊手术分类系统可能有助于更有效地优先处理病例,减少到手术室的延误和术后并发症。本研究评估急诊腹部手术局部实施分类对术后并发症的影响。方法:在某大学医院进行了一项前后对比研究,纳入了在实施外科急诊分类之前(2019年9月至2020年3月)和之后(2023年6月至2023年12月)两个6个月期间接受急诊腹部手术的患者。该分类由当地专家小组制定,根据五个紧急级别分配理想手术时间(iTTS)。倾向得分加权分析用于调整混杂因素。终点为30天内主要术后并发症的发生情况。结果:共分析438例患者(实施前219例,实施后219例)。以实际手术时间(aTTS)/iTTS比值衡量的超额iTTS,以及术后并发症(呼吸、感染、消化、心脏)和急性肾损伤在实施后组均显著降低(p)。结论:本研究表明,实施急诊腹部手术分级可能通过减少手术延迟来降低术后并发症的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of an emergency abdominal surgery classification: a propensity score-weighted before-after study.

Background: Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. A structured classification system for emergency surgery may help prioritize cases more effectively, reducing delays to the operating room and postoperative complications. This study evaluates the impact of a locally implemented classification for emergency abdominal surgery on postoperative complications.

Methods: A before-and-after study was conducted in a University Hospital and included patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery over two 6-month periods: before (September 2019 to March 2020) and after (June 2023 to December 2023) the implementation of a surgical emergency classification. The classification, developed by a panel of local experts, assigned an ideal time to surgery (iTTS) based on five urgency grades. Propensity score-weighted analysis was used to adjust for confounding factors. The endpoint was the occurrence of major postoperative complications within 30 days.

Results: A total of 438 patients were analyzed (219 before and 219 after implementation). Excess iTTS measured by the actual time to surgery (aTTS)/iTTS ratio and postoperative complications (respiratory, infectious, digestive, cardiac) as well as acute kidney injury were significantly lower in the post-implementation group (p <  0.05). After inverse probability weighting (IPW), the risk of postoperative complications was significantly associated with the implementation of classification, with a relative risk of 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19-0.85], P < 0.001.

Conclusions: This study shows that the implementation of a classification of emergency abdominal surgery could reduce the rate of postoperative complications probably by reducing the delay to surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信