认知康复护理对精神分裂症患者认知功能障碍的影响:一项综合系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Xin Di, Wang Yan, Li Biao, Liu Tuo, Meng Jing
{"title":"认知康复护理对精神分裂症患者认知功能障碍的影响:一项综合系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xin Di, Wang Yan, Li Biao, Liu Tuo, Meng Jing","doi":"10.1891/JCP-2025-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia, significantly affecting patients' daily functioning and quality of life. Cognitive rehabilitation nursing (CRN) has emerged as a promising nonpharmacological approach to improve cognitive deficits. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CRN in enhancing cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. A systematic literature search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus for studies published between 2020 and 2025, using a combination of controlled vocabulary and free-text terms. Eligible studies were original, peer-reviewed articles examining CRN interventions in individuals with schizophrenia, with cognitive or functional outcomes. Fifteen studies comprising 19 intervention arms met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 (Risk of Bias 2) tool for randomized trials and ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) for nonrandomized studies. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with Hedges' g correction were calculated under a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was examined using I² statistics, and publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's test. A total of 19 intervention arms from 15 studies were included. Overall, cognitive rehabilitation yielded a small but favorable effect across cognitive domains (SMD = .35, <i>p</i> = .084), with a significant moderate-to-large effect observed for executive function (SMD = 0.63, <i>p</i> = .035), particularly in studies employing computerized, individualized, or virtual reality-based interventions. Effects on global cognition, memory, and functional outcomes were smaller and nonsignificant, while social cognition, assessed in one study, showed a small negative effect (SMD = -0.34, <i>p</i> = .046). Pharmacological and game-based interventions showed inconsistent efficacy. Substantial heterogeneity was present (I² = 85.3%), with outcome domain emerging as a significant moderator (<i>p</i> < .001). Publication bias analysis indicated potential small-study effects, although no missing studies were identified via the trim-and-fill method. This meta-analysis supports the effectiveness of CRN in improving cognitive outcomes in schizophrenia, with the strongest effects on executive function. Targeted, multimodal, and tech-enhanced interventions showed the greatest promise. Despite heterogeneity, the findings were consistent, reinforcing CRN's role in multidisciplinary psychiatric care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Cognitive Rehabilitation Nursing on Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Di, Wang Yan, Li Biao, Liu Tuo, Meng Jing\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JCP-2025-0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia, significantly affecting patients' daily functioning and quality of life. Cognitive rehabilitation nursing (CRN) has emerged as a promising nonpharmacological approach to improve cognitive deficits. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CRN in enhancing cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. A systematic literature search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus for studies published between 2020 and 2025, using a combination of controlled vocabulary and free-text terms. Eligible studies were original, peer-reviewed articles examining CRN interventions in individuals with schizophrenia, with cognitive or functional outcomes. Fifteen studies comprising 19 intervention arms met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 (Risk of Bias 2) tool for randomized trials and ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) for nonrandomized studies. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with Hedges' g correction were calculated under a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was examined using I² statistics, and publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's test. A total of 19 intervention arms from 15 studies were included. Overall, cognitive rehabilitation yielded a small but favorable effect across cognitive domains (SMD = .35, <i>p</i> = .084), with a significant moderate-to-large effect observed for executive function (SMD = 0.63, <i>p</i> = .035), particularly in studies employing computerized, individualized, or virtual reality-based interventions. Effects on global cognition, memory, and functional outcomes were smaller and nonsignificant, while social cognition, assessed in one study, showed a small negative effect (SMD = -0.34, <i>p</i> = .046). Pharmacological and game-based interventions showed inconsistent efficacy. Substantial heterogeneity was present (I² = 85.3%), with outcome domain emerging as a significant moderator (<i>p</i> < .001). Publication bias analysis indicated potential small-study effects, although no missing studies were identified via the trim-and-fill method. This meta-analysis supports the effectiveness of CRN in improving cognitive outcomes in schizophrenia, with the strongest effects on executive function. Targeted, multimodal, and tech-enhanced interventions showed the greatest promise. Despite heterogeneity, the findings were consistent, reinforcing CRN's role in multidisciplinary psychiatric care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JCP-2025-0012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JCP-2025-0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知障碍是精神分裂症的核心特征,严重影响患者的日常功能和生活质量。认知康复护理(CRN)已成为一种有希望改善认知缺陷的非药物方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估CRN在增强精神分裂症患者认知功能方面的疗效。在Web of Science、PubMed和Scopus中对2020年至2025年间发表的研究进行了系统的文献检索,使用了受控词汇和自由文本术语的组合。符合条件的研究是原创的、同行评审的文章,这些文章检查了精神分裂症患者的CRN干预措施,有认知或功能结果。包括19个干预组的15项研究符合纳入标准。采用随机试验的Cochrane rob2 (Risk of Bias 2)工具和非随机研究的ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in non -random Studies of Interventions)工具评估方法学质量。在随机效应模型下计算Hedges' g校正的标准化平均差(SMDs)。采用I²统计量检验异质性,通过漏斗图和Egger检验评估发表偏倚。共纳入了来自15项研究的19个干预组。总体而言,认知康复在认知领域产生了小而有利的效果(SMD = 0.35, p = 0.084),在执行功能方面观察到显著的中大型效果(SMD = 0.63, p = 0.035),特别是在采用计算机化、个性化或基于虚拟现实的干预措施的研究中。对整体认知、记忆和功能结果的影响较小且不显著,而在一项研究中评估的社会认知显示出较小的负面影响(SMD = -0.34, p = 0.046)。药理学和基于游戏的干预显示出不一致的效果。存在大量异质性(I²= 85.3%),结果域出现为显著调节因子(p < 0.001)。发表偏倚分析显示了潜在的小研究效应,尽管没有通过补齐法发现缺失的研究。本荟萃分析支持CRN在改善精神分裂症患者认知预后方面的有效性,其中对执行功能的影响最大。有针对性、多模式和技术增强的干预措施显示出最大的前景。尽管存在异质性,但研究结果是一致的,这加强了CRN在多学科精神病学护理中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Cognitive Rehabilitation Nursing on Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia, significantly affecting patients' daily functioning and quality of life. Cognitive rehabilitation nursing (CRN) has emerged as a promising nonpharmacological approach to improve cognitive deficits. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CRN in enhancing cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. A systematic literature search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus for studies published between 2020 and 2025, using a combination of controlled vocabulary and free-text terms. Eligible studies were original, peer-reviewed articles examining CRN interventions in individuals with schizophrenia, with cognitive or functional outcomes. Fifteen studies comprising 19 intervention arms met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 (Risk of Bias 2) tool for randomized trials and ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) for nonrandomized studies. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with Hedges' g correction were calculated under a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was examined using I² statistics, and publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's test. A total of 19 intervention arms from 15 studies were included. Overall, cognitive rehabilitation yielded a small but favorable effect across cognitive domains (SMD = .35, p = .084), with a significant moderate-to-large effect observed for executive function (SMD = 0.63, p = .035), particularly in studies employing computerized, individualized, or virtual reality-based interventions. Effects on global cognition, memory, and functional outcomes were smaller and nonsignificant, while social cognition, assessed in one study, showed a small negative effect (SMD = -0.34, p = .046). Pharmacological and game-based interventions showed inconsistent efficacy. Substantial heterogeneity was present (I² = 85.3%), with outcome domain emerging as a significant moderator (p < .001). Publication bias analysis indicated potential small-study effects, although no missing studies were identified via the trim-and-fill method. This meta-analysis supports the effectiveness of CRN in improving cognitive outcomes in schizophrenia, with the strongest effects on executive function. Targeted, multimodal, and tech-enhanced interventions showed the greatest promise. Despite heterogeneity, the findings were consistent, reinforcing CRN's role in multidisciplinary psychiatric care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy is devoted to advancing the science and clinical practice of cognitive-behavior therapy. This includes a range of interventions including cognitive therapy, rational-emotive behavior therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness approaches. The journal publishes empirical papers, including case studies, along with review articles, papers that integrate cognitive-behavior therapy with other systems, and practical "how to" articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信