青年和老年群体人格障碍替代模型的差异项目功能分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Lisa E Stone-Bury, Alyssa M Premovich, Daniel L Segal
{"title":"青年和老年群体人格障碍替代模型的差异项目功能分析。","authors":"Lisa E Stone-Bury, Alyssa M Premovich, Daniel L Segal","doi":"10.1177/00914150251382807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Age bias on personality pathology measures creates challenges regarding assessment of personality disorders among older adults. This study cross-sectionally examined age bias on measures of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders' (AMPD) two diagnostic criteria. Younger and older adults in the United States completed the Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self-Report (LPFS-SR) and Personality Inventory for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition</i>-Brief Form (PID-5-BF). Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses examined bias on the item-level whereas differential test functioning (DTF) analyses investigated impacts on the domain-level. For the LPFS-SR, 23% of items demonstrated DIF, with the Empathy and Intimacy domains most impacted. For the PID-5-BF, 40% of items showed large DIF, with four of five domains demonstrating large age bias. Across measures, items showed evidence of bias for and against older adults. Findings indicate meaningful age bias on measurements of both AMPD diagnostic criteria, suggesting greater potential to mischaracterize findings when using these measures across the lifespan.</p>","PeriodicalId":47878,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aging & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":"914150251382807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Differential Item Functioning Analysis of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Across Younger and Older Age Groups.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa E Stone-Bury, Alyssa M Premovich, Daniel L Segal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00914150251382807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Age bias on personality pathology measures creates challenges regarding assessment of personality disorders among older adults. This study cross-sectionally examined age bias on measures of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders' (AMPD) two diagnostic criteria. Younger and older adults in the United States completed the Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self-Report (LPFS-SR) and Personality Inventory for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition</i>-Brief Form (PID-5-BF). Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses examined bias on the item-level whereas differential test functioning (DTF) analyses investigated impacts on the domain-level. For the LPFS-SR, 23% of items demonstrated DIF, with the Empathy and Intimacy domains most impacted. For the PID-5-BF, 40% of items showed large DIF, with four of five domains demonstrating large age bias. Across measures, items showed evidence of bias for and against older adults. Findings indicate meaningful age bias on measurements of both AMPD diagnostic criteria, suggesting greater potential to mischaracterize findings when using these measures across the lifespan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Aging & Human Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"914150251382807\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Aging & Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150251382807\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aging & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150251382807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人格病理学测量的年龄偏见给老年人人格障碍的评估带来了挑战。本研究横断面检验了年龄偏差对人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)两种诊断标准的影响。美国的年轻人和老年人完成了人格功能水平量表-自我报告(LPFS-SR)和精神障碍诊断与统计手册人格量表,第5版-简要表格(PID-5-BF)。差异项目功能(DIF)分析考察了项目水平上的偏差,而差异测试功能(DTF)分析考察了领域水平上的影响。在LPFS-SR中,23%的项目表现出DIF,其中共情和亲密领域受影响最大。对于PID-5-BF, 40%的条目显示较大的DIF, 5个域中有4个域显示较大的年龄偏差。通过测量,项目显示出对老年人的偏见。研究结果表明,两种AMPD诊断标准的测量结果存在明显的年龄偏差,表明在整个生命周期中使用这些测量方法时,更有可能错误地描述结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Differential Item Functioning Analysis of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Across Younger and Older Age Groups.

Age bias on personality pathology measures creates challenges regarding assessment of personality disorders among older adults. This study cross-sectionally examined age bias on measures of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders' (AMPD) two diagnostic criteria. Younger and older adults in the United States completed the Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self-Report (LPFS-SR) and Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition-Brief Form (PID-5-BF). Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses examined bias on the item-level whereas differential test functioning (DTF) analyses investigated impacts on the domain-level. For the LPFS-SR, 23% of items demonstrated DIF, with the Empathy and Intimacy domains most impacted. For the PID-5-BF, 40% of items showed large DIF, with four of five domains demonstrating large age bias. Across measures, items showed evidence of bias for and against older adults. Findings indicate meaningful age bias on measurements of both AMPD diagnostic criteria, suggesting greater potential to mischaracterize findings when using these measures across the lifespan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: These are some of the broad questions with which the International Journal of Aging and Human Development is concerned. Emphasis is upon psychological and social studies of aging and the aged. However, the Journal also publishes research that introduces observations from other fields that illuminate the "human" side of gerontology, or utilizes gerontological observations to illuminate in other fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信