{"title":"基于性别的辐射暴露和外周血管内介入治疗肢体缺血的临床结果:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Subrata Kar, Clifton Espinoza","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.110220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral endovascular intervention (PEVI) is performed using radiation. Radiation has deleterious health consequences for patients and operators.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the gender radiation disparities and procedural outcomes in PEVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was performed in 186 consecutive patients (65 ± 12 years) at an academic medical center from January 2019 to April 2020 (mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 3.6 months) comparing the gender radiation disparity and outcomes of PEVI (<i>n</i> = 147 underwent intervention, 79.0%). Groups were divided into women (<i>n</i> = 99, 53.2%) and men (<i>n</i> = 87, 48.4%). Primary endpoints included air kerma, dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and contrast use. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, stroke, repeat revascularization, major adverse limb event, and the composite of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men showed increased DAP compared with women (15221.2 ± 25858.5 µGy × m<sup>2</sup> <i>vs</i> 9251.7 ± 9555.3 µGy × m<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.047), but no significant difference in air kerma or any other primary endpoints. In the secondary endpoints, no significant difference was found between gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Men had increased DAP indicating more radiation absorption in the exposed area. Gender outcomes showed no difference in complications. Thus, PEVI can be safely performed in men or women.</p>","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"17 9","pages":"110220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender-based radiation exposure and clinical outcomes in peripheral endovascular intervention for limb ischemia: A prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Subrata Kar, Clifton Espinoza\",\"doi\":\"10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.110220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral endovascular intervention (PEVI) is performed using radiation. Radiation has deleterious health consequences for patients and operators.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the gender radiation disparities and procedural outcomes in PEVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was performed in 186 consecutive patients (65 ± 12 years) at an academic medical center from January 2019 to April 2020 (mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 3.6 months) comparing the gender radiation disparity and outcomes of PEVI (<i>n</i> = 147 underwent intervention, 79.0%). Groups were divided into women (<i>n</i> = 99, 53.2%) and men (<i>n</i> = 87, 48.4%). Primary endpoints included air kerma, dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and contrast use. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, stroke, repeat revascularization, major adverse limb event, and the composite of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men showed increased DAP compared with women (15221.2 ± 25858.5 µGy × m<sup>2</sup> <i>vs</i> 9251.7 ± 9555.3 µGy × m<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.047), but no significant difference in air kerma or any other primary endpoints. In the secondary endpoints, no significant difference was found between gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Men had increased DAP indicating more radiation absorption in the exposed area. Gender outcomes showed no difference in complications. Thus, PEVI can be safely performed in men or women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"110220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.110220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.110220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:外周血管内介入治疗(PEVI)是一种放射治疗方法。辐射对病人和操作人员的健康造成有害后果。目的:探讨PEVI的性别放射差异及手术结果。方法:2019年1月至2020年4月,在某学术医疗中心(平均随访3.9±3.6个月)对186例连续患者(65±12岁)进行前瞻性观察研究,比较PEVI的性别辐射差异和结局(n = 147,占79.0%)。分组分为女性(n = 99, 53.2%)和男性(n = 87, 48.4%)。主要终点包括空气温度、剂量面积积(DAP)、透视时间和造影剂使用。次要终点包括全因死亡率、急性心肌梗死、急性肾损伤、卒中、重复血运重建术、主要肢体不良事件和并发症的综合。结果:男性与女性相比DAP增加(15221.2±25858.5µGy × m2 vs 9251.7±9555.3µGy × m2, P = 0.047),但空气质量及其他主要终点无显著差异。在次要终点,没有发现性别之间的显著差异。结论:男性DAP升高表明暴露区域的辐射吸收更多。性别结果显示并发症无差异。因此,PEVI可以安全地在男性或女性中进行。
Gender-based radiation exposure and clinical outcomes in peripheral endovascular intervention for limb ischemia: A prospective study.
Background: Peripheral endovascular intervention (PEVI) is performed using radiation. Radiation has deleterious health consequences for patients and operators.
Aim: To investigate the gender radiation disparities and procedural outcomes in PEVI.
Methods: A prospective observational study was performed in 186 consecutive patients (65 ± 12 years) at an academic medical center from January 2019 to April 2020 (mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 3.6 months) comparing the gender radiation disparity and outcomes of PEVI (n = 147 underwent intervention, 79.0%). Groups were divided into women (n = 99, 53.2%) and men (n = 87, 48.4%). Primary endpoints included air kerma, dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and contrast use. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, stroke, repeat revascularization, major adverse limb event, and the composite of complications.
Results: Men showed increased DAP compared with women (15221.2 ± 25858.5 µGy × m2vs 9251.7 ± 9555.3 µGy × m2, P = 0.047), but no significant difference in air kerma or any other primary endpoints. In the secondary endpoints, no significant difference was found between gender.
Conclusion: Men had increased DAP indicating more radiation absorption in the exposed area. Gender outcomes showed no difference in complications. Thus, PEVI can be safely performed in men or women.