经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术比较左主干疾病的血运重建策略。

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ryaan El-Andari, Jimmy Kang, Nicholas Fialka, Yongzhe Hong, Finlay A McAlister, Jeevan Nagendran, Jayan Nagendran
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术比较左主干疾病的血运重建策略。","authors":"Ryaan El-Andari, Jimmy Kang, Nicholas Fialka, Yongzhe Hong, Finlay A McAlister, Jeevan Nagendran, Jayan Nagendran","doi":"10.1038/s43856-025-01098-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) has long been the preferred treatment for left main coronary artery disease(LMCAD), although percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) has been increasingly utilized. Despite numerous investigations seeking to identify the optimal revascularization strategy for LMCAD, limitations in sample size or follow-up duration have hindered definitive conclusions. Herein, we compare the long-term outcomes up to 14 years after CABG or PCI for patients with LMCAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was retrospectively collected from a provincial database. The inclusion criteria is patients ≥18 years old, with LMCAD, and revascularization with CABG or PCI. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes are any rehospitalization, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or repeat revascularization. Outcomes are adjusted for age, sex, and clinical comorbidities. The average age of the patients was 67 ± 9 years for the CABG patients and 71 ± 11 years for the PCI patients. 84.7% of the CABG patients and 71.5% of the PCI patients were male.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5580 patients are identified with LMCAD between 2009 and 2018. 1706 patients (1180 CABG; 526 PCI) are included in the final analysis and followed until March 31, 2023. Rates of mortality at longest follow-up of 14 years are 40.0% for CABG and 58.4% for PCI (adjusted hazard ratio(aHR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval(CI) 0.48-0.70, p < 0.001). Rates of MI (10.7% vs 22.3%, aHR 0.40, 95% CI 0.29-0.55, p < 0.001) and repeat revascularization (5.4%vs16.3%, aHR 0.25, 95% CI 0.18-0.36, p < 0.001) favor CABG over PCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with LMCAD undergoing CABG experience significant benefit over PCI in terms of long-term mortality, MI, and required repeat revascularization. These finding suggest CABG should remain the preferred revascularization strategy for patients with LMCAD and acceptable surgical risk. Future studies should explore evolving PCI techniques and their impact on long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"402"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revascularization strategy for left main coronary artery disease comparing percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting.\",\"authors\":\"Ryaan El-Andari, Jimmy Kang, Nicholas Fialka, Yongzhe Hong, Finlay A McAlister, Jeevan Nagendran, Jayan Nagendran\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43856-025-01098-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) has long been the preferred treatment for left main coronary artery disease(LMCAD), although percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) has been increasingly utilized. Despite numerous investigations seeking to identify the optimal revascularization strategy for LMCAD, limitations in sample size or follow-up duration have hindered definitive conclusions. Herein, we compare the long-term outcomes up to 14 years after CABG or PCI for patients with LMCAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was retrospectively collected from a provincial database. The inclusion criteria is patients ≥18 years old, with LMCAD, and revascularization with CABG or PCI. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes are any rehospitalization, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or repeat revascularization. Outcomes are adjusted for age, sex, and clinical comorbidities. The average age of the patients was 67 ± 9 years for the CABG patients and 71 ± 11 years for the PCI patients. 84.7% of the CABG patients and 71.5% of the PCI patients were male.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5580 patients are identified with LMCAD between 2009 and 2018. 1706 patients (1180 CABG; 526 PCI) are included in the final analysis and followed until March 31, 2023. Rates of mortality at longest follow-up of 14 years are 40.0% for CABG and 58.4% for PCI (adjusted hazard ratio(aHR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval(CI) 0.48-0.70, p < 0.001). Rates of MI (10.7% vs 22.3%, aHR 0.40, 95% CI 0.29-0.55, p < 0.001) and repeat revascularization (5.4%vs16.3%, aHR 0.25, 95% CI 0.18-0.36, p < 0.001) favor CABG over PCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with LMCAD undergoing CABG experience significant benefit over PCI in terms of long-term mortality, MI, and required repeat revascularization. These finding suggest CABG should remain the preferred revascularization strategy for patients with LMCAD and acceptable surgical risk. Future studies should explore evolving PCI techniques and their impact on long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480625/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-01098-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-01098-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)长期以来一直是左主干冠状动脉疾病(LMCAD)的首选治疗方法,尽管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的应用越来越多。尽管有许多研究试图确定LMCAD的最佳血运重建策略,但样本量或随访时间的限制阻碍了明确的结论。在此,我们比较了LMCAD患者在CABG或PCI治疗后长达14年的长期结果。方法:回顾性收集省级数据库资料。纳入标准为患者年龄≥18岁,伴有LMCAD,并通过CABG或PCI进行血运重建术。主要结果是全因死亡率。次要结局是任何再住院、心肌梗死(MI)、中风或重复血运重建术。结果根据年龄、性别和临床合并症进行调整。CABG组平均年龄为67±9岁,PCI组平均年龄为71±11岁。84.7%的CABG患者和71.5%的PCI患者为男性。结果:2009年至2018年间,5580例患者被确诊为LMCAD。1706例患者(1180例CABG, 526例PCI)纳入最终分析,随访至2023年3月31日。最长随访14年的死亡率CABG组为40.0%,PCI组为58.4%(校正风险比(aHR) 0.58, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.48-0.70, p)结论:LMCAD患者行CABG在长期死亡率、心肌梗死和需要的重复血运重成术方面比PCI有显著的益处。这些发现表明,对于LMCAD患者和可接受的手术风险,CABG仍应是首选的血运重建策略。未来的研究应该探索PCI技术的发展及其对长期预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revascularization strategy for left main coronary artery disease comparing percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting.

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) has long been the preferred treatment for left main coronary artery disease(LMCAD), although percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) has been increasingly utilized. Despite numerous investigations seeking to identify the optimal revascularization strategy for LMCAD, limitations in sample size or follow-up duration have hindered definitive conclusions. Herein, we compare the long-term outcomes up to 14 years after CABG or PCI for patients with LMCAD.

Methods: Data was retrospectively collected from a provincial database. The inclusion criteria is patients ≥18 years old, with LMCAD, and revascularization with CABG or PCI. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes are any rehospitalization, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or repeat revascularization. Outcomes are adjusted for age, sex, and clinical comorbidities. The average age of the patients was 67 ± 9 years for the CABG patients and 71 ± 11 years for the PCI patients. 84.7% of the CABG patients and 71.5% of the PCI patients were male.

Results: 5580 patients are identified with LMCAD between 2009 and 2018. 1706 patients (1180 CABG; 526 PCI) are included in the final analysis and followed until March 31, 2023. Rates of mortality at longest follow-up of 14 years are 40.0% for CABG and 58.4% for PCI (adjusted hazard ratio(aHR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval(CI) 0.48-0.70, p < 0.001). Rates of MI (10.7% vs 22.3%, aHR 0.40, 95% CI 0.29-0.55, p < 0.001) and repeat revascularization (5.4%vs16.3%, aHR 0.25, 95% CI 0.18-0.36, p < 0.001) favor CABG over PCI.

Conclusions: Patients with LMCAD undergoing CABG experience significant benefit over PCI in terms of long-term mortality, MI, and required repeat revascularization. These finding suggest CABG should remain the preferred revascularization strategy for patients with LMCAD and acceptable surgical risk. Future studies should explore evolving PCI techniques and their impact on long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信