早期胃癌内镜下粘膜下剥离术后迟发性出血预测因素的meta分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shou-Yuan Xu, Qi-Feng Lou, Ai-Yu Yu, Yu-Feng Tong, Qi Ding
{"title":"早期胃癌内镜下粘膜下剥离术后迟发性出血预测因素的meta分析。","authors":"Shou-Yuan Xu, Qi-Feng Lou, Ai-Yu Yu, Yu-Feng Tong, Qi Ding","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.109159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) remains a substantial global health burden, and its early detection and treatment is critical for optimizing patient outcomes. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for early GC but is linked to an increased risk of complications, such as delayed hemorrhage, which underscore the need for a comprehensive investigation into the disease's risk factors.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To perform a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the literature to identify and quantify risk factors associated with late-onset bleeding subsequent to ESD for early GC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies reporting risk factors for delayed bleeding after ESD for early GC were identified through a comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library). The selection of studies, data retrieval, and quality evaluation were carried out separately by two reviewers. The combined odds ratios (OR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated utilizing a random-effects approach. The meta-analysis has been registered on the International Registry of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY202540116).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 publications comprising 1945 patients were incorporated into the present analysis. The following risk factors were found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of delayed bleeding after ESD: Long operation time (OR = 2.55, 95%CI: 2.40-2.72, <i>I</i>² = 11%, <i>n</i> = 5 studies), lesions detected in the upper part of the stomach (OR = 3.44, 95%CI: 3.19-3.70, <i>I</i>² = 0%, <i>n</i> = 4 studies), advanced age (OR = 3.61, 95%CI: 3.47-3.76, <i>I</i>² = 38%, <i>n</i> = 5 studies), history of taking antithrombotic drugs (OR = 2.58, 95%CI: 2.48-2.68, <i>I</i>² = 45%, <i>n</i> = 3 studies), resection size > 40 mm (OR = 3.01, 95%CI: 2.78-3.26, <i>I</i>² = 31%, <i>n</i> = 5 studies), hemodialysis (OR = 2.42, 95%CI: 2.33-2.51, <i>I</i>² = 0%, <i>n</i> = 4 studies), presence of ulcers (OR = 2.54, 95%CI: 2.33-2.77, <i>I</i>² = 0%, <i>n</i> = 3 studies).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis identified several risk factors associated with an increased probability of delayed bleeding after ESD for early GC, including long operation time, lesions in the upper stomach, advanced age, antithrombotic drug use, large resection size, hemodialysis, and the presence of ulcers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 9","pages":"109159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis of predictive factors for delayed hemorrhage after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early-stage gastric carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Shou-Yuan Xu, Qi-Feng Lou, Ai-Yu Yu, Yu-Feng Tong, Qi Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.109159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) remains a substantial global health burden, and its early detection and treatment is critical for optimizing patient outcomes. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for early GC but is linked to an increased risk of complications, such as delayed hemorrhage, which underscore the need for a comprehensive investigation into the disease's risk factors.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To perform a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the literature to identify and quantify risk factors associated with late-onset bleeding subsequent to ESD for early GC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies reporting risk factors for delayed bleeding after ESD for early GC were identified through a comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library). The selection of studies, data retrieval, and quality evaluation were carried out separately by two reviewers. The combined odds ratios (OR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated utilizing a random-effects approach. The meta-analysis has been registered on the International Registry of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY202540116).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 publications comprising 1945 patients were incorporated into the present analysis. The following risk factors were found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of delayed bleeding after ESD: Long operation time (OR = 2.55, 95%CI: 2.40-2.72, <i>I</i>² = 11%, <i>n</i> = 5 studies), lesions detected in the upper part of the stomach (OR = 3.44, 95%CI: 3.19-3.70, <i>I</i>² = 0%, <i>n</i> = 4 studies), advanced age (OR = 3.61, 95%CI: 3.47-3.76, <i>I</i>² = 38%, <i>n</i> = 5 studies), history of taking antithrombotic drugs (OR = 2.58, 95%CI: 2.48-2.68, <i>I</i>² = 45%, <i>n</i> = 3 studies), resection size > 40 mm (OR = 3.01, 95%CI: 2.78-3.26, <i>I</i>² = 31%, <i>n</i> = 5 studies), hemodialysis (OR = 2.42, 95%CI: 2.33-2.51, <i>I</i>² = 0%, <i>n</i> = 4 studies), presence of ulcers (OR = 2.54, 95%CI: 2.33-2.77, <i>I</i>² = 0%, <i>n</i> = 3 studies).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis identified several risk factors associated with an increased probability of delayed bleeding after ESD for early GC, including long operation time, lesions in the upper stomach, advanced age, antithrombotic drug use, large resection size, hemodialysis, and the presence of ulcers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"109159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476733/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.109159\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.109159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胃癌(GC)仍然是一个重大的全球健康负担,其早期发现和治疗对于优化患者预后至关重要。内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)是早期胃癌的一种微创技术,但与并发症(如迟发性出血)的风险增加有关,这强调了对该疾病危险因素进行全面调查的必要性。目的:对文献进行全面回顾和荟萃分析,以确定和量化早期GC患者ESD后迟发性出血的相关危险因素。方法:通过全面检索电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library),筛选报告早期GC ESD后延迟出血危险因素的研究。研究选择、数据检索和质量评价由两位审稿人分别进行。综合优势比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)采用随机效应方法计算。该荟萃分析已在国际系统评价和荟萃分析方案注册(INPLASY202540116)上注册。结果:本分析共纳入11篇文献,包括1945例患者。以下危险因素与ESD后迟发性出血风险增加显著相关:手术时间长(OR = 2.55, 95%CI: 2.40 ~ 2.72, I²= 11%,n = 5项研究)、胃上部病变(OR = 3.44, 95%CI: 3.19 ~ 3.70, I²= 0%,n = 4项研究)、高龄(OR = 3.61, 95%CI: 3.47 ~ 3.76, I²= 38%,n = 5项研究)、服用抗血栓药物史(OR = 2.58, 95%CI:2.48-2.68, I²= 45%,n = 3项研究),切除面积> - 40mm (OR = 3.01, 95%CI: 2.78-3.26, I²= 31%,n = 5项研究),血液透析(OR = 2.42, 95%CI: 2.33-2.51, I²= 0%,n = 4项研究),溃疡存在(OR = 2.54, 95%CI: 2.33-2.77, I²= 0%,n = 3项研究)。结论:本meta分析确定了与早期胃癌ESD后延迟出血概率增加相关的几个危险因素,包括手术时间长、上胃病变、高龄、抗血栓药物使用、切除面积大、血液透析和溃疡的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Meta-analysis of predictive factors for delayed hemorrhage after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early-stage gastric carcinoma.

Meta-analysis of predictive factors for delayed hemorrhage after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early-stage gastric carcinoma.

Meta-analysis of predictive factors for delayed hemorrhage after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early-stage gastric carcinoma.

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) remains a substantial global health burden, and its early detection and treatment is critical for optimizing patient outcomes. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for early GC but is linked to an increased risk of complications, such as delayed hemorrhage, which underscore the need for a comprehensive investigation into the disease's risk factors.

Aim: To perform a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the literature to identify and quantify risk factors associated with late-onset bleeding subsequent to ESD for early GC.

Methods: Studies reporting risk factors for delayed bleeding after ESD for early GC were identified through a comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library). The selection of studies, data retrieval, and quality evaluation were carried out separately by two reviewers. The combined odds ratios (OR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated utilizing a random-effects approach. The meta-analysis has been registered on the International Registry of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY202540116).

Results: A total of 11 publications comprising 1945 patients were incorporated into the present analysis. The following risk factors were found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of delayed bleeding after ESD: Long operation time (OR = 2.55, 95%CI: 2.40-2.72, I² = 11%, n = 5 studies), lesions detected in the upper part of the stomach (OR = 3.44, 95%CI: 3.19-3.70, I² = 0%, n = 4 studies), advanced age (OR = 3.61, 95%CI: 3.47-3.76, I² = 38%, n = 5 studies), history of taking antithrombotic drugs (OR = 2.58, 95%CI: 2.48-2.68, I² = 45%, n = 3 studies), resection size > 40 mm (OR = 3.01, 95%CI: 2.78-3.26, I² = 31%, n = 5 studies), hemodialysis (OR = 2.42, 95%CI: 2.33-2.51, I² = 0%, n = 4 studies), presence of ulcers (OR = 2.54, 95%CI: 2.33-2.77, I² = 0%, n = 3 studies).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis identified several risk factors associated with an increased probability of delayed bleeding after ESD for early GC, including long operation time, lesions in the upper stomach, advanced age, antithrombotic drug use, large resection size, hemodialysis, and the presence of ulcers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信