威胁注意与广泛性焦虑症症状的时间动态:LPP斜坡的研究

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Ben Swanson, Matt R Judah, Grant S Shields
{"title":"威胁注意与广泛性焦虑症症状的时间动态:LPP斜坡的研究","authors":"Ben Swanson, Matt R Judah, Grant S Shields","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals experiencing generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) show heightened attention to threat, as suggested by greater amplitude of the late positive potential (LPP). However, amplitude measurements do not fully capitalize on the high temporal resolution of EEG. Specifically, amplitude does not reflect the rate of change in the LPP over a window of interest, which may be important to understand LPP dynamics in individuals with GAD. Indeed, this rate of change of the LPP (i.e., LPP slope) may reflect attentional orienting. The current study leveraged multilevel models to examine the LPP in relation to GAD symptoms. We hypothesized that more-positive LPP slopes to threat images will be associated with GAD symptoms from 400 to 700 ms. Participants (N = 105) passively viewed blocks consisting of threatening or neutral images during EEG recording. Participant-level LPP slopes were estimated using and extracted from multilevel models, and the extracted slopes were examined. LPP slopes were reliable, but they only weakly correlated with mean amplitudes-suggesting LPP slopes may capture an attentional process that could be distinct from that captured by mean amplitudes. When considered as concurrent predictors of GAD, in an early window of the LPP (400-700 ms), the conjunction of the threat-LPP slope and the threat-LPP mean amplitude explained three times as much variance in GAD symptoms as mean amplitude did alone. During a later window of the LPP (700-2000 ms), more-negative LPP slope responses to threat were also related to GAD symptomology. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the relationship between the threat-LPP slope and GAD symptoms was largely robust to measurement confounds. Together, the current study is the first to identify that LPP slope is uniquely related to GAD symptoms. Our data further suggest that LPP slope is a unique measure of the broader LPP response that warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 10","pages":"e70157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Temporal Dynamics of Attention to Threat and GAD Symptoms: A Study of LPP Slopes.\",\"authors\":\"Ben Swanson, Matt R Judah, Grant S Shields\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.70157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Individuals experiencing generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) show heightened attention to threat, as suggested by greater amplitude of the late positive potential (LPP). However, amplitude measurements do not fully capitalize on the high temporal resolution of EEG. Specifically, amplitude does not reflect the rate of change in the LPP over a window of interest, which may be important to understand LPP dynamics in individuals with GAD. Indeed, this rate of change of the LPP (i.e., LPP slope) may reflect attentional orienting. The current study leveraged multilevel models to examine the LPP in relation to GAD symptoms. We hypothesized that more-positive LPP slopes to threat images will be associated with GAD symptoms from 400 to 700 ms. Participants (N = 105) passively viewed blocks consisting of threatening or neutral images during EEG recording. Participant-level LPP slopes were estimated using and extracted from multilevel models, and the extracted slopes were examined. LPP slopes were reliable, but they only weakly correlated with mean amplitudes-suggesting LPP slopes may capture an attentional process that could be distinct from that captured by mean amplitudes. When considered as concurrent predictors of GAD, in an early window of the LPP (400-700 ms), the conjunction of the threat-LPP slope and the threat-LPP mean amplitude explained three times as much variance in GAD symptoms as mean amplitude did alone. During a later window of the LPP (700-2000 ms), more-negative LPP slope responses to threat were also related to GAD symptomology. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the relationship between the threat-LPP slope and GAD symptoms was largely robust to measurement confounds. Together, the current study is the first to identify that LPP slope is uniquely related to GAD symptoms. Our data further suggest that LPP slope is a unique measure of the broader LPP response that warrants further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"62 10\",\"pages\":\"e70157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481178/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70157\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经历广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的个体表现出对威胁的高度关注,这表明晚期正电位(LPP)的振幅更大。然而,幅度测量并不能充分利用脑电图的高时间分辨率。具体来说,振幅并不能反映LPP在一个兴趣窗口内的变化率,这对于理解广泛性焦虑症患者的LPP动态可能很重要。事实上,LPP的变化率(即LPP斜率)可能反映了注意定向。目前的研究利用多层模型来检验LPP与广泛性焦虑症症状的关系。我们假设威胁图像的LPP斜率在400 - 700 ms之间与广泛性焦虑症症状相关。105名参与者在EEG记录过程中被动观看由威胁性或中性图像组成的图像块。利用多层模型估计和提取参与者水平的LPP斜率,并对提取的斜率进行检验。LPP斜率是可靠的,但它们与平均振幅的相关性很弱,这表明LPP斜率可能捕捉到的注意力过程与平均振幅捕捉到的注意力过程不同。当被认为是GAD的并发预测因子时,在LPP的早期窗口(400-700 ms),威胁-LPP斜率和威胁-LPP平均振幅的结合解释了GAD症状的方差,是平均振幅单独解释的三倍。在较晚的LPP窗口期(700-2000 ms),对威胁的更负性LPP斜率反应也与广泛性焦虑症的症状有关。敏感性分析表明,威胁- lpp斜率与GAD症状之间的关系对测量混淆在很大程度上是稳健的。总之,目前的研究是第一个确定LPP斜率与广泛性焦虑症症状唯一相关的研究。我们的数据进一步表明,LPP斜率是更广泛的LPP响应的独特度量,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Temporal Dynamics of Attention to Threat and GAD Symptoms: A Study of LPP Slopes.

Individuals experiencing generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) show heightened attention to threat, as suggested by greater amplitude of the late positive potential (LPP). However, amplitude measurements do not fully capitalize on the high temporal resolution of EEG. Specifically, amplitude does not reflect the rate of change in the LPP over a window of interest, which may be important to understand LPP dynamics in individuals with GAD. Indeed, this rate of change of the LPP (i.e., LPP slope) may reflect attentional orienting. The current study leveraged multilevel models to examine the LPP in relation to GAD symptoms. We hypothesized that more-positive LPP slopes to threat images will be associated with GAD symptoms from 400 to 700 ms. Participants (N = 105) passively viewed blocks consisting of threatening or neutral images during EEG recording. Participant-level LPP slopes were estimated using and extracted from multilevel models, and the extracted slopes were examined. LPP slopes were reliable, but they only weakly correlated with mean amplitudes-suggesting LPP slopes may capture an attentional process that could be distinct from that captured by mean amplitudes. When considered as concurrent predictors of GAD, in an early window of the LPP (400-700 ms), the conjunction of the threat-LPP slope and the threat-LPP mean amplitude explained three times as much variance in GAD symptoms as mean amplitude did alone. During a later window of the LPP (700-2000 ms), more-negative LPP slope responses to threat were also related to GAD symptomology. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the relationship between the threat-LPP slope and GAD symptoms was largely robust to measurement confounds. Together, the current study is the first to identify that LPP slope is uniquely related to GAD symptoms. Our data further suggest that LPP slope is a unique measure of the broader LPP response that warrants further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信