Emily Allen-Rice, Sarah Knight, Angela de Bruin, Sven Mattys
{"title":"EXPRESS:在双语语境下的选择性和分割性听力。","authors":"Emily Allen-Rice, Sarah Knight, Angela de Bruin, Sven Mattys","doi":"10.1177/17470218251386821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background speech can reduce intelligibility of target speech because of masking effects. However, masking can be mitigated by presenting target and masker dichotically, an effect we refer to as the dichotic advantage. Because masking, and signal degradation in general, is often shown to negatively impact second language (L2) more than first language (L1) processing, we hypothesised that L2 might accrue a greater dichotic advantage than L1 when listener must selectively attend to the target and ignore the masker. Under divided attention, however, dichotic presentation might introduce cognitive costs due to the need for binaural attentional control. Such costs might be particularly pronounced for L2 given the already high cognitive demands associated with L2 processing and therefore mitigate the L2 dichotic advantage. Using a dual-language context, Spanish (L1)-English (L2) bilinguals heard one English sentence and one Spanish sentence simultaneously, either diotically or dichotically. They completed a selective-attention task (track one talker - Experiment 1) and a divided-attention task (track both talkers - Experiment 2). In both experiments, performance was higher for L1 than L2. The dichotic advantage (better performance in dichotic than diotic listening) was similar for L1 and L2. It was smaller under divided than selective attention, suggesting that increased the cognitive costs incurred by divided listening reduced the dichotic advantage. The results demonstrate that bilinguals experience a dichotic advantage of a similar size in each language (L1 and L2), even in dual-language contexts and under high cognitive load.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251386821"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: Selective and divided listening in a dual-language context.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Allen-Rice, Sarah Knight, Angela de Bruin, Sven Mattys\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17470218251386821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background speech can reduce intelligibility of target speech because of masking effects. However, masking can be mitigated by presenting target and masker dichotically, an effect we refer to as the dichotic advantage. Because masking, and signal degradation in general, is often shown to negatively impact second language (L2) more than first language (L1) processing, we hypothesised that L2 might accrue a greater dichotic advantage than L1 when listener must selectively attend to the target and ignore the masker. Under divided attention, however, dichotic presentation might introduce cognitive costs due to the need for binaural attentional control. Such costs might be particularly pronounced for L2 given the already high cognitive demands associated with L2 processing and therefore mitigate the L2 dichotic advantage. Using a dual-language context, Spanish (L1)-English (L2) bilinguals heard one English sentence and one Spanish sentence simultaneously, either diotically or dichotically. They completed a selective-attention task (track one talker - Experiment 1) and a divided-attention task (track both talkers - Experiment 2). In both experiments, performance was higher for L1 than L2. The dichotic advantage (better performance in dichotic than diotic listening) was similar for L1 and L2. It was smaller under divided than selective attention, suggesting that increased the cognitive costs incurred by divided listening reduced the dichotic advantage. The results demonstrate that bilinguals experience a dichotic advantage of a similar size in each language (L1 and L2), even in dual-language contexts and under high cognitive load.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17470218251386821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251386821\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251386821","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
EXPRESS: Selective and divided listening in a dual-language context.
Background speech can reduce intelligibility of target speech because of masking effects. However, masking can be mitigated by presenting target and masker dichotically, an effect we refer to as the dichotic advantage. Because masking, and signal degradation in general, is often shown to negatively impact second language (L2) more than first language (L1) processing, we hypothesised that L2 might accrue a greater dichotic advantage than L1 when listener must selectively attend to the target and ignore the masker. Under divided attention, however, dichotic presentation might introduce cognitive costs due to the need for binaural attentional control. Such costs might be particularly pronounced for L2 given the already high cognitive demands associated with L2 processing and therefore mitigate the L2 dichotic advantage. Using a dual-language context, Spanish (L1)-English (L2) bilinguals heard one English sentence and one Spanish sentence simultaneously, either diotically or dichotically. They completed a selective-attention task (track one talker - Experiment 1) and a divided-attention task (track both talkers - Experiment 2). In both experiments, performance was higher for L1 than L2. The dichotic advantage (better performance in dichotic than diotic listening) was similar for L1 and L2. It was smaller under divided than selective attention, suggesting that increased the cognitive costs incurred by divided listening reduced the dichotic advantage. The results demonstrate that bilinguals experience a dichotic advantage of a similar size in each language (L1 and L2), even in dual-language contexts and under high cognitive load.
期刊介绍:
Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling.
QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form.
The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.