EXPRESS:在双语语境下的选择性和分割性听力。

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Emily Allen-Rice, Sarah Knight, Angela de Bruin, Sven Mattys
{"title":"EXPRESS:在双语语境下的选择性和分割性听力。","authors":"Emily Allen-Rice, Sarah Knight, Angela de Bruin, Sven Mattys","doi":"10.1177/17470218251386821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background speech can reduce intelligibility of target speech because of masking effects. However, masking can be mitigated by presenting target and masker dichotically, an effect we refer to as the dichotic advantage. Because masking, and signal degradation in general, is often shown to negatively impact second language (L2) more than first language (L1) processing, we hypothesised that L2 might accrue a greater dichotic advantage than L1 when listener must selectively attend to the target and ignore the masker. Under divided attention, however, dichotic presentation might introduce cognitive costs due to the need for binaural attentional control. Such costs might be particularly pronounced for L2 given the already high cognitive demands associated with L2 processing and therefore mitigate the L2 dichotic advantage. Using a dual-language context, Spanish (L1)-English (L2) bilinguals heard one English sentence and one Spanish sentence simultaneously, either diotically or dichotically. They completed a selective-attention task (track one talker - Experiment 1) and a divided-attention task (track both talkers - Experiment 2). In both experiments, performance was higher for L1 than L2. The dichotic advantage (better performance in dichotic than diotic listening) was similar for L1 and L2. It was smaller under divided than selective attention, suggesting that increased the cognitive costs incurred by divided listening reduced the dichotic advantage. The results demonstrate that bilinguals experience a dichotic advantage of a similar size in each language (L1 and L2), even in dual-language contexts and under high cognitive load.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251386821"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: Selective and divided listening in a dual-language context.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Allen-Rice, Sarah Knight, Angela de Bruin, Sven Mattys\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17470218251386821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background speech can reduce intelligibility of target speech because of masking effects. However, masking can be mitigated by presenting target and masker dichotically, an effect we refer to as the dichotic advantage. Because masking, and signal degradation in general, is often shown to negatively impact second language (L2) more than first language (L1) processing, we hypothesised that L2 might accrue a greater dichotic advantage than L1 when listener must selectively attend to the target and ignore the masker. Under divided attention, however, dichotic presentation might introduce cognitive costs due to the need for binaural attentional control. Such costs might be particularly pronounced for L2 given the already high cognitive demands associated with L2 processing and therefore mitigate the L2 dichotic advantage. Using a dual-language context, Spanish (L1)-English (L2) bilinguals heard one English sentence and one Spanish sentence simultaneously, either diotically or dichotically. They completed a selective-attention task (track one talker - Experiment 1) and a divided-attention task (track both talkers - Experiment 2). In both experiments, performance was higher for L1 than L2. The dichotic advantage (better performance in dichotic than diotic listening) was similar for L1 and L2. It was smaller under divided than selective attention, suggesting that increased the cognitive costs incurred by divided listening reduced the dichotic advantage. The results demonstrate that bilinguals experience a dichotic advantage of a similar size in each language (L1 and L2), even in dual-language contexts and under high cognitive load.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17470218251386821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251386821\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251386821","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景语音由于掩蔽效应会降低目标语音的可理解性。然而,掩蔽可以通过将目标和掩蔽物分开呈现来减轻,我们将这种效果称为二叉优势。由于掩蔽和信号退化通常对第二语言(L2)的负面影响大于对第一语言(L1)处理的负面影响,我们假设当听者必须选择性地关注目标而忽略掩蔽时,第二语言可能比第一语言积累更大的二分优势。然而,在分散注意下,由于双耳注意控制的需要,二元呈现可能会引入认知成本。考虑到与二语加工相关的高认知需求,这种成本对于二语来说可能特别明显,因此减轻了二语的二分优势。在双语环境中,西班牙语(L1)-英语(L2)双语者同时听到一个英语句子和一个西班牙语句子,要么是二分法,要么是二分法。他们完成了一个选择性注意任务(跟踪一个说话者——实验1)和一个分散注意任务(跟踪两个说话者——实验2)。在两个实验中,L1的表现都高于L2。二分听力的优势(二分听力比二分听力表现更好)在L1和L2上是相似的。在分听的情况下,它比选择性注意要小,这表明分听所产生的认知成本的增加减少了二分优势。结果表明,即使在双语环境和高认知负荷下,双语者在每种语言(第一语言和第二语言)中都有相似大小的二分优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPRESS: Selective and divided listening in a dual-language context.

Background speech can reduce intelligibility of target speech because of masking effects. However, masking can be mitigated by presenting target and masker dichotically, an effect we refer to as the dichotic advantage. Because masking, and signal degradation in general, is often shown to negatively impact second language (L2) more than first language (L1) processing, we hypothesised that L2 might accrue a greater dichotic advantage than L1 when listener must selectively attend to the target and ignore the masker. Under divided attention, however, dichotic presentation might introduce cognitive costs due to the need for binaural attentional control. Such costs might be particularly pronounced for L2 given the already high cognitive demands associated with L2 processing and therefore mitigate the L2 dichotic advantage. Using a dual-language context, Spanish (L1)-English (L2) bilinguals heard one English sentence and one Spanish sentence simultaneously, either diotically or dichotically. They completed a selective-attention task (track one talker - Experiment 1) and a divided-attention task (track both talkers - Experiment 2). In both experiments, performance was higher for L1 than L2. The dichotic advantage (better performance in dichotic than diotic listening) was similar for L1 and L2. It was smaller under divided than selective attention, suggesting that increased the cognitive costs incurred by divided listening reduced the dichotic advantage. The results demonstrate that bilinguals experience a dichotic advantage of a similar size in each language (L1 and L2), even in dual-language contexts and under high cognitive load.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信