{"title":"中腭缝线分离后微型辅助上颌快速扩张(MARPE)的扩张模式:基于聚类的分类。","authors":"Gwan-Hyeong Song, Sang-Min Lee, Dong-Hwa Chung, Jin-Woo Lee, Jae Hyun Park","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to establish a clustering-based classification model for skeletal expansion outcomes after miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion (MARPE) and evaluate its clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study samples comprised 61 patients with transverse discrepancy who underwent maxillary skeletal expansion using MSE I. Cone-beam computed tomography images before (T0) and after (T1) expansion were analysed with nine measurements assessing transverse changes in the maxilla, molars and appliance. Gaussian mixture model clustering, random forest models and decision trees identified expansion patterns and key classifiers, establishing a classification system. Two- and one-way analyses of variance compared intergroup characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clustering-based classification model identified four distinct clusters of skeletal expansion patterns, establishing two key classifiers: expansion efficiency (good/poor) and parallelism (parallel/V-shaped). Poor responders had an older age and showed significantly lower efficiency, more V-shaped tendencies, greater activation loss and longer intervals until interincisal diastema than good responders (p < 0.001). V-shaped responders exhibited less efficiency, reduced posterior expansion and increased miniscrew slippering (p < 0.001). Twenty days until interincisal diastema can be used to monitor expansion efficiency. Age is a useful predictor of efficiency, except during the ambiguous period of 16.81-20.14 years (17.91-19.88 for males, 16.95-18.94 for females) and for outliers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study introduces a concrete classification system for MARPE outcomes, emphasising the role of expansion efficiency and parallelism in optimising clinical results. These four identified phenotypes provide a data-driven validation of the existing concepts of expansion patterns and their implications for treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expansion Pattern of Miniscrew Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion (MARPE) After Midpalatal Suture Separation: Clustering-Based Classification.\",\"authors\":\"Gwan-Hyeong Song, Sang-Min Lee, Dong-Hwa Chung, Jin-Woo Lee, Jae Hyun Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to establish a clustering-based classification model for skeletal expansion outcomes after miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion (MARPE) and evaluate its clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study samples comprised 61 patients with transverse discrepancy who underwent maxillary skeletal expansion using MSE I. Cone-beam computed tomography images before (T0) and after (T1) expansion were analysed with nine measurements assessing transverse changes in the maxilla, molars and appliance. Gaussian mixture model clustering, random forest models and decision trees identified expansion patterns and key classifiers, establishing a classification system. Two- and one-way analyses of variance compared intergroup characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clustering-based classification model identified four distinct clusters of skeletal expansion patterns, establishing two key classifiers: expansion efficiency (good/poor) and parallelism (parallel/V-shaped). Poor responders had an older age and showed significantly lower efficiency, more V-shaped tendencies, greater activation loss and longer intervals until interincisal diastema than good responders (p < 0.001). V-shaped responders exhibited less efficiency, reduced posterior expansion and increased miniscrew slippering (p < 0.001). Twenty days until interincisal diastema can be used to monitor expansion efficiency. Age is a useful predictor of efficiency, except during the ambiguous period of 16.81-20.14 years (17.91-19.88 for males, 16.95-18.94 for females) and for outliers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study introduces a concrete classification system for MARPE outcomes, emphasising the role of expansion efficiency and parallelism in optimising clinical results. These four identified phenotypes provide a data-driven validation of the existing concepts of expansion patterns and their implications for treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70040\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Expansion Pattern of Miniscrew Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion (MARPE) After Midpalatal Suture Separation: Clustering-Based Classification.
Objectives: This study aimed to establish a clustering-based classification model for skeletal expansion outcomes after miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion (MARPE) and evaluate its clinical implications.
Material and methods: The study samples comprised 61 patients with transverse discrepancy who underwent maxillary skeletal expansion using MSE I. Cone-beam computed tomography images before (T0) and after (T1) expansion were analysed with nine measurements assessing transverse changes in the maxilla, molars and appliance. Gaussian mixture model clustering, random forest models and decision trees identified expansion patterns and key classifiers, establishing a classification system. Two- and one-way analyses of variance compared intergroup characteristics.
Results: The clustering-based classification model identified four distinct clusters of skeletal expansion patterns, establishing two key classifiers: expansion efficiency (good/poor) and parallelism (parallel/V-shaped). Poor responders had an older age and showed significantly lower efficiency, more V-shaped tendencies, greater activation loss and longer intervals until interincisal diastema than good responders (p < 0.001). V-shaped responders exhibited less efficiency, reduced posterior expansion and increased miniscrew slippering (p < 0.001). Twenty days until interincisal diastema can be used to monitor expansion efficiency. Age is a useful predictor of efficiency, except during the ambiguous period of 16.81-20.14 years (17.91-19.88 for males, 16.95-18.94 for females) and for outliers.
Conclusion: This study introduces a concrete classification system for MARPE outcomes, emphasising the role of expansion efficiency and parallelism in optimising clinical results. These four identified phenotypes provide a data-driven validation of the existing concepts of expansion patterns and their implications for treatment.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.