无监督家庭肺活量测定在初级保健中的可行性、质量和附加价值。

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
T A le Rütte, M Kerkhof, Y H Gerritsma, M M G Driessen-Roelfszema, L van den Bemt, J W M Muris, R A Riemersma, H Sandelowsky, B Stridh, J W H Kocks
{"title":"无监督家庭肺活量测定在初级保健中的可行性、质量和附加价值。","authors":"T A le Rütte, M Kerkhof, Y H Gerritsma, M M G Driessen-Roelfszema, L van den Bemt, J W M Muris, R A Riemersma, H Sandelowsky, B Stridh, J W H Kocks","doi":"10.1038/s41533-025-00432-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At-home spirometry could provide added value for the diagnosis and monitoring of obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care. However, it is unknown whether implementation in a real-world setting is practicable and produces good quality spirometry. We studied feasibility, quality and added value of at-home spirometry in primary care practices in the Netherlands and Sweden. Adults with an asthma- or COPD-related spirometry indication were provided with equipment to perform unsupervised spirometry at-home. Differences in FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC-values from home and general practice were compared, and questionnaires on feasibility were completed by participants and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Of 140 participants, 89.3% completed a home spirometry session, of whom 59.2% produced acceptable spirometry. Overall, HCPs and participants rated home spirometry as feasible and of added value for asthma and COPD monitoring in primary care, though less helpful for diagnostic purposes. A small mean difference in spirometry results was observed, with FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC at-home being 0.076 and 0.094 L higher than at the GP office, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility, quality and added value of unsupervised at-home spirometry in primary care.\",\"authors\":\"T A le Rütte, M Kerkhof, Y H Gerritsma, M M G Driessen-Roelfszema, L van den Bemt, J W M Muris, R A Riemersma, H Sandelowsky, B Stridh, J W H Kocks\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41533-025-00432-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>At-home spirometry could provide added value for the diagnosis and monitoring of obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care. However, it is unknown whether implementation in a real-world setting is practicable and produces good quality spirometry. We studied feasibility, quality and added value of at-home spirometry in primary care practices in the Netherlands and Sweden. Adults with an asthma- or COPD-related spirometry indication were provided with equipment to perform unsupervised spirometry at-home. Differences in FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC-values from home and general practice were compared, and questionnaires on feasibility were completed by participants and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Of 140 participants, 89.3% completed a home spirometry session, of whom 59.2% produced acceptable spirometry. Overall, HCPs and participants rated home spirometry as feasible and of added value for asthma and COPD monitoring in primary care, though less helpful for diagnostic purposes. A small mean difference in spirometry results was observed, with FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC at-home being 0.076 and 0.094 L higher than at the GP office, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480718/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-025-00432-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-025-00432-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家庭肺活量测定法可为初级保健中阻塞性肺疾病的诊断和监测提供附加价值。然而,尚不清楚在现实环境中实施是否可行并产生高质量的肺活量测定。我们研究了在荷兰和瑞典的初级保健实践中家庭肺活量测定的可行性、质量和附加价值。患有哮喘或copd相关肺活量测定指征的成年人在家中使用无监督的肺活量测定设备。比较家庭和一般实践中FEV1和fvc值的差异,并由参与者和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)完成可行性问卷。在140名参与者中,89.3%的人完成了家庭肺活量测定,其中59.2%的人产生了可接受的肺活量测定。总体而言,HCPs和参与者认为家庭肺活量测定法是可行的,并且在初级保健中对哮喘和COPD监测具有附加价值,尽管对诊断目的的帮助不大。肺活量测定结果的平均差异较小,家中的FEV1和FVC分别比GP办公室高0.076和0.094 L。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feasibility, quality and added value of unsupervised at-home spirometry in primary care.

Feasibility, quality and added value of unsupervised at-home spirometry in primary care.

Feasibility, quality and added value of unsupervised at-home spirometry in primary care.

Feasibility, quality and added value of unsupervised at-home spirometry in primary care.

At-home spirometry could provide added value for the diagnosis and monitoring of obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care. However, it is unknown whether implementation in a real-world setting is practicable and produces good quality spirometry. We studied feasibility, quality and added value of at-home spirometry in primary care practices in the Netherlands and Sweden. Adults with an asthma- or COPD-related spirometry indication were provided with equipment to perform unsupervised spirometry at-home. Differences in FEV1 and FVC-values from home and general practice were compared, and questionnaires on feasibility were completed by participants and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Of 140 participants, 89.3% completed a home spirometry session, of whom 59.2% produced acceptable spirometry. Overall, HCPs and participants rated home spirometry as feasible and of added value for asthma and COPD monitoring in primary care, though less helpful for diagnostic purposes. A small mean difference in spirometry results was observed, with FEV1 and FVC at-home being 0.076 and 0.094 L higher than at the GP office, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信