Paolo Marchetti, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mauro Biffoni, Sara Lonardi, Simone Scagnoli, Lorenzo Fornaro, Valentina Guarneri, Ugo De Giorgi, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Giovanni Blandino, Giulia D'Amati, Massimo Aglietta, Chiara Cremolini, Pierfranco Conte, Edoardo Crimini, Maurizio Ceracchi, Simona Pisegna, Sofia Verkhovskaia, Roberto Bordonaro, Sergio Bracarda, Giovanni Butturini, Lucia Del Mastro, Andrea DeCensi, Agnese Fabbri, Elisabetta Fenocchio, Stefania Gori, Giulio Metro, Annamaria Pessino, Daniele Pozzessere, Fabio Puglisi, Stefano Tamberi, Alberto Zambelli, Donatella Marino, Ettore Capoluongo, Federico Cappuzzo, Bruna Cerbelli, Giuseppe Giannini, Umberto Malapelle, Federica Mazzuca, Marianna Nuti, Giancarlo Pruneri, Maurizio Simmaco, Lidia Strigari, Giuseppe Tonini, Nello Martini, Andrea Botticelli
{"title":"晚期实体瘤的基因组匹配治疗:随机2期ROME试验","authors":"Paolo Marchetti, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mauro Biffoni, Sara Lonardi, Simone Scagnoli, Lorenzo Fornaro, Valentina Guarneri, Ugo De Giorgi, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Giovanni Blandino, Giulia D'Amati, Massimo Aglietta, Chiara Cremolini, Pierfranco Conte, Edoardo Crimini, Maurizio Ceracchi, Simona Pisegna, Sofia Verkhovskaia, Roberto Bordonaro, Sergio Bracarda, Giovanni Butturini, Lucia Del Mastro, Andrea DeCensi, Agnese Fabbri, Elisabetta Fenocchio, Stefania Gori, Giulio Metro, Annamaria Pessino, Daniele Pozzessere, Fabio Puglisi, Stefano Tamberi, Alberto Zambelli, Donatella Marino, Ettore Capoluongo, Federico Cappuzzo, Bruna Cerbelli, Giuseppe Giannini, Umberto Malapelle, Federica Mazzuca, Marianna Nuti, Giancarlo Pruneri, Maurizio Simmaco, Lidia Strigari, Giuseppe Tonini, Nello Martini, Andrea Botticelli","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03918-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite recent advancements demonstrating the potential of tumor-agnostic biomarkers to guide effective therapies, randomized evidence supporting the clinical superiority of precision oncology approaches compared to standard therapies remains limited. The ROME trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 2 study comparing tailored treatment (TT) to standard of care (SoC) in patients with advanced solid tumors progressing after one or two lines of therapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling on tissue and blood was performed to identify actionable alterations. Overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), time to next treatment (TTNT) and safety were the secondary endpoints. Between November 2020 and August 2023, 1,794 patients were screened, 897 were evaluated by the molecular tumor board (MTB) and 400 were randomized to TT or SoC. TT achieved a significantly higher ORR (17.5% versus 10%; P = 0.0294) and improved median PFS (3.5 months versus 2.8 months; hazard ratio = 0.66 (0.53-0.82), P = 0.0002). TT also showed superior 12-month PFS rates (22.0% versus 8.3%). Median OS was similar, with a 52% crossover rate. Grade 3/4 adverse events were also similar (40% TT versus 52% SoC). These results highlight the potential of TT to improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. These results also provide relevant evidence supporting a tumor-agnostic precision oncology strategy and highlight the potential of TTs, guided by genomic profiling and MTB recommendations, to significantly improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04591431 .</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomically matched therapy in advanced solid tumors: the randomized phase 2 ROME trial.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Marchetti, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mauro Biffoni, Sara Lonardi, Simone Scagnoli, Lorenzo Fornaro, Valentina Guarneri, Ugo De Giorgi, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Giovanni Blandino, Giulia D'Amati, Massimo Aglietta, Chiara Cremolini, Pierfranco Conte, Edoardo Crimini, Maurizio Ceracchi, Simona Pisegna, Sofia Verkhovskaia, Roberto Bordonaro, Sergio Bracarda, Giovanni Butturini, Lucia Del Mastro, Andrea DeCensi, Agnese Fabbri, Elisabetta Fenocchio, Stefania Gori, Giulio Metro, Annamaria Pessino, Daniele Pozzessere, Fabio Puglisi, Stefano Tamberi, Alberto Zambelli, Donatella Marino, Ettore Capoluongo, Federico Cappuzzo, Bruna Cerbelli, Giuseppe Giannini, Umberto Malapelle, Federica Mazzuca, Marianna Nuti, Giancarlo Pruneri, Maurizio Simmaco, Lidia Strigari, Giuseppe Tonini, Nello Martini, Andrea Botticelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03918-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite recent advancements demonstrating the potential of tumor-agnostic biomarkers to guide effective therapies, randomized evidence supporting the clinical superiority of precision oncology approaches compared to standard therapies remains limited. The ROME trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 2 study comparing tailored treatment (TT) to standard of care (SoC) in patients with advanced solid tumors progressing after one or two lines of therapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling on tissue and blood was performed to identify actionable alterations. Overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), time to next treatment (TTNT) and safety were the secondary endpoints. Between November 2020 and August 2023, 1,794 patients were screened, 897 were evaluated by the molecular tumor board (MTB) and 400 were randomized to TT or SoC. TT achieved a significantly higher ORR (17.5% versus 10%; P = 0.0294) and improved median PFS (3.5 months versus 2.8 months; hazard ratio = 0.66 (0.53-0.82), P = 0.0002). TT also showed superior 12-month PFS rates (22.0% versus 8.3%). Median OS was similar, with a 52% crossover rate. Grade 3/4 adverse events were also similar (40% TT versus 52% SoC). These results highlight the potential of TT to improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. These results also provide relevant evidence supporting a tumor-agnostic precision oncology strategy and highlight the potential of TTs, guided by genomic profiling and MTB recommendations, to significantly improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04591431 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":50.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03918-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03918-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管最近的进展表明肿瘤不可知生物标志物在指导有效治疗方面的潜力,但与标准治疗相比,支持精确肿瘤学方法临床优势的随机证据仍然有限。ROME试验是一项多中心、随机、开放标签的2期研究,比较了在接受一种或两种治疗后进展的晚期实体瘤患者的定制治疗(TT)和标准治疗(SoC)。对组织和血液进行全面的基因组分析,以确定可操作的改变。总缓解率(ORR)是主要终点,无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、治疗失败时间(TTF)、下一次治疗时间(TTNT)和安全性是次要终点。在2020年11月至2023年8月期间,对1794名患者进行了筛查,897名患者接受了分子肿瘤委员会(MTB)的评估,400名患者随机接受TT或SoC治疗。TT获得了显著更高的ORR (17.5% vs 10%; P = 0.0294)和改善的中位PFS(3.5个月vs 2.8个月;风险比= 0.66 (0.53-0.82),P = 0.0002)。TT也显示出更高的12个月PFS率(22.0%比8.3%)。中位OS相似,交叉率为52%。3/4级不良事件也相似(40% TT vs 52% SoC)。这些结果突出了TT在改善具有多种可操作基因组改变的患者预后方面的潜力。这些结果还提供了支持肿瘤不可知的精确肿瘤学策略的相关证据,并强调了在基因组分析和MTB建议的指导下,tt的潜力,以显着改善具有各种可操作的基因组改变的患者的预后。ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:NCT04591431。
Genomically matched therapy in advanced solid tumors: the randomized phase 2 ROME trial.
Despite recent advancements demonstrating the potential of tumor-agnostic biomarkers to guide effective therapies, randomized evidence supporting the clinical superiority of precision oncology approaches compared to standard therapies remains limited. The ROME trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 2 study comparing tailored treatment (TT) to standard of care (SoC) in patients with advanced solid tumors progressing after one or two lines of therapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling on tissue and blood was performed to identify actionable alterations. Overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), time to next treatment (TTNT) and safety were the secondary endpoints. Between November 2020 and August 2023, 1,794 patients were screened, 897 were evaluated by the molecular tumor board (MTB) and 400 were randomized to TT or SoC. TT achieved a significantly higher ORR (17.5% versus 10%; P = 0.0294) and improved median PFS (3.5 months versus 2.8 months; hazard ratio = 0.66 (0.53-0.82), P = 0.0002). TT also showed superior 12-month PFS rates (22.0% versus 8.3%). Median OS was similar, with a 52% crossover rate. Grade 3/4 adverse events were also similar (40% TT versus 52% SoC). These results highlight the potential of TT to improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. These results also provide relevant evidence supporting a tumor-agnostic precision oncology strategy and highlight the potential of TTs, guided by genomic profiling and MTB recommendations, to significantly improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04591431 .
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.