Hanim E Diktas, Chloe P Lozano, Sanjoy Saha, Stephanie T Broyles, Corby K Martin, John W Apolzan
求助PDF
{"title":"PortionSize™和MyFitnessPal©智能手机应用程序估计膳食摄入量的有效性:一项随机交叉临床试验。","authors":"Hanim E Diktas, Chloe P Lozano, Sanjoy Saha, Stephanie T Broyles, Corby K Martin, John W Apolzan","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.09.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>PortionSize™ is a smartphone app that utilizes augmented reality and portion size templates to facilitate users' food intake estimates. MyFitnessPal© is a commercial app that tracks food intake based on user's portion size estimates. Both apps provide real-time feedback on dietary intake, with PortionSize also providing feedback on intake of MyPlate food groups.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test validity of both apps for accurately measuring food intake compared to weighed food.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a within-subjects randomized counterbalanced design, we tested validity of both apps for accurately measuring food intake compared to weighed food. In semi-controlled free-living settings, adults received a cooler each day that contained pre-weighed foods and were instructed to consume only food and beverages provided. Participants used PortionSize and MyFitnessPal during 3-day periods separated by ∼1-week with prior training on each app. After study periods, participants completed a User Preference Survey (UPS). Two one-sided t-tests, with ±18% equivalence bounds, were used to test whether energy intake estimated with apps was statistically equivalent to weighed intake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis sample (n = 44; 1 dropped) consisted of 55% females, with a mean (SD) age of 44 (11) years. PortionSize (P=0.032) and MyFitnessPal (P<0.001) energy intake (kcal) estimates were equivalent to weighed intake (mean percent error 8.0% vs 3.7%; respectively). MyFitnessPal had smaller relative absolute error (P<0.001) for energy intake compared to PortionSize. PortionSize and weighed food group estimations were equivalent for protein intake (P=0.002). Although estimates for vegetables, fruits, and dairy were not equivalent, the magnitude of error was relatively low (<0.5 cup Eq). For the UPS, 82% of participants preferred using MyFitnessPal compared to PortionSize (18%; P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In semi-controlled free-living settings, both apps provided equivalent energy intake estimates compared to weighed foods; however, PortionSize showed greater error for energy and lower user preference than MyFitnessPal, highlighting the need for improvements to decrease error and enhance user experience.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT05166226, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05166226.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of the PortionSize™ and MyFitnessPal© smartphone apps for estimating dietary intake: A randomized crossover clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hanim E Diktas, Chloe P Lozano, Sanjoy Saha, Stephanie T Broyles, Corby K Martin, John W Apolzan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.09.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>PortionSize™ is a smartphone app that utilizes augmented reality and portion size templates to facilitate users' food intake estimates. MyFitnessPal© is a commercial app that tracks food intake based on user's portion size estimates. Both apps provide real-time feedback on dietary intake, with PortionSize also providing feedback on intake of MyPlate food groups.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test validity of both apps for accurately measuring food intake compared to weighed food.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a within-subjects randomized counterbalanced design, we tested validity of both apps for accurately measuring food intake compared to weighed food. In semi-controlled free-living settings, adults received a cooler each day that contained pre-weighed foods and were instructed to consume only food and beverages provided. Participants used PortionSize and MyFitnessPal during 3-day periods separated by ∼1-week with prior training on each app. After study periods, participants completed a User Preference Survey (UPS). Two one-sided t-tests, with ±18% equivalence bounds, were used to test whether energy intake estimated with apps was statistically equivalent to weighed intake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis sample (n = 44; 1 dropped) consisted of 55% females, with a mean (SD) age of 44 (11) years. PortionSize (P=0.032) and MyFitnessPal (P<0.001) energy intake (kcal) estimates were equivalent to weighed intake (mean percent error 8.0% vs 3.7%; respectively). MyFitnessPal had smaller relative absolute error (P<0.001) for energy intake compared to PortionSize. PortionSize and weighed food group estimations were equivalent for protein intake (P=0.002). Although estimates for vegetables, fruits, and dairy were not equivalent, the magnitude of error was relatively low (<0.5 cup Eq). For the UPS, 82% of participants preferred using MyFitnessPal compared to PortionSize (18%; P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In semi-controlled free-living settings, both apps provided equivalent energy intake estimates compared to weighed foods; however, PortionSize showed greater error for energy and lower user preference than MyFitnessPal, highlighting the need for improvements to decrease error and enhance user experience.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT05166226, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05166226.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.09.027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.09.027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Validity of the PortionSize™ and MyFitnessPal© smartphone apps for estimating dietary intake: A randomized crossover clinical trial.
Background: PortionSize™ is a smartphone app that utilizes augmented reality and portion size templates to facilitate users' food intake estimates. MyFitnessPal© is a commercial app that tracks food intake based on user's portion size estimates. Both apps provide real-time feedback on dietary intake, with PortionSize also providing feedback on intake of MyPlate food groups.
Objective: To test validity of both apps for accurately measuring food intake compared to weighed food.
Methods: In a within-subjects randomized counterbalanced design, we tested validity of both apps for accurately measuring food intake compared to weighed food. In semi-controlled free-living settings, adults received a cooler each day that contained pre-weighed foods and were instructed to consume only food and beverages provided. Participants used PortionSize and MyFitnessPal during 3-day periods separated by ∼1-week with prior training on each app. After study periods, participants completed a User Preference Survey (UPS). Two one-sided t-tests, with ±18% equivalence bounds, were used to test whether energy intake estimated with apps was statistically equivalent to weighed intake.
Results: The analysis sample (n = 44; 1 dropped) consisted of 55% females, with a mean (SD) age of 44 (11) years. PortionSize (P=0.032) and MyFitnessPal (P<0.001) energy intake (kcal) estimates were equivalent to weighed intake (mean percent error 8.0% vs 3.7%; respectively). MyFitnessPal had smaller relative absolute error (P<0.001) for energy intake compared to PortionSize. PortionSize and weighed food group estimations were equivalent for protein intake (P=0.002). Although estimates for vegetables, fruits, and dairy were not equivalent, the magnitude of error was relatively low (<0.5 cup Eq). For the UPS, 82% of participants preferred using MyFitnessPal compared to PortionSize (18%; P<0.001).
Conclusions: In semi-controlled free-living settings, both apps provided equivalent energy intake estimates compared to weighed foods; however, PortionSize showed greater error for energy and lower user preference than MyFitnessPal, highlighting the need for improvements to decrease error and enhance user experience.
Clinical trial registration: NCT05166226, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05166226.