{"title":"螺旋钢板比髓内钉或长直外侧钢板治疗肱骨骨干骨折延至肱骨近端效果更好。","authors":"Xiaolong Wang, Xin Zhang, Yuxuan Jiang, Haifeng Qiao, Xiaomin Kang, Yangjun Zhu, Yan Zhang, Dongxu Feng","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-06283-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was performed to compare the operative clinical outcomes of helical plating, intramedullary nailing (IMN), and long straight lateral plating in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures extending into the proximal humerus, as well as to identify the optimal fixation strategy for managing such injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 81 patients with humeral shaft fractures extending into the proximal humerus were divided into three groups based on treatment strategy: helical plating (Group A, n = 16), IMN (Group B, n = 12), and long straight lateral plating (Group C, n = 53). Preoperative demographic data and imaging were collected from the medical records. Operative time, blood transfusion, bone reduction quality, bone healing rate, and incidence of complications were recorded. Clinical evaluation included the Constant-Murley score for shoulder function, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire for upper limb function, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and assessments of shoulder stiffness or instability and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with Groups A and C, patients in Group B had a longer operative time and lower blood transfusion requirements. More than 80% of patients in each group achieved bone reduction quality rated as \"better than good.\" There were no significant differences among the three groups in operative time, blood transfusion, or shaft angulation. Bone healing rates were 100%, 91.7%, and 94.3% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Mean shoulder flexion was 155.0°, 130.0°, and 150.0°, respectively. Functional outcomes, including the Constant-Murley score, DASH score, VAS score, and patient satisfaction, were significantly better in Group A than in Groups B and C. No complications occurred in Group A. One patient in Group B developed nonunion. In Group C, complications were observed in five patients (9.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the treatment of humeral shaft fractures extending into the proximal humerus, helical plating was associated with a higher bone union rate, better functional outcomes, and a lower postoperative complication rate compared with IMN or long straight lateral locking plates. Outcomes after nailing and long straight lateral plating were similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"858"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Helical plating yields better outcomes than intramedullary nailing or long straight lateral plating for humeral shaft fractures extending to the proximal humerus.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaolong Wang, Xin Zhang, Yuxuan Jiang, Haifeng Qiao, Xiaomin Kang, Yangjun Zhu, Yan Zhang, Dongxu Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-025-06283-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was performed to compare the operative clinical outcomes of helical plating, intramedullary nailing (IMN), and long straight lateral plating in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures extending into the proximal humerus, as well as to identify the optimal fixation strategy for managing such injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 81 patients with humeral shaft fractures extending into the proximal humerus were divided into three groups based on treatment strategy: helical plating (Group A, n = 16), IMN (Group B, n = 12), and long straight lateral plating (Group C, n = 53). Preoperative demographic data and imaging were collected from the medical records. Operative time, blood transfusion, bone reduction quality, bone healing rate, and incidence of complications were recorded. Clinical evaluation included the Constant-Murley score for shoulder function, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire for upper limb function, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and assessments of shoulder stiffness or instability and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with Groups A and C, patients in Group B had a longer operative time and lower blood transfusion requirements. More than 80% of patients in each group achieved bone reduction quality rated as \\\"better than good.\\\" There were no significant differences among the three groups in operative time, blood transfusion, or shaft angulation. Bone healing rates were 100%, 91.7%, and 94.3% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Mean shoulder flexion was 155.0°, 130.0°, and 150.0°, respectively. Functional outcomes, including the Constant-Murley score, DASH score, VAS score, and patient satisfaction, were significantly better in Group A than in Groups B and C. No complications occurred in Group A. One patient in Group B developed nonunion. In Group C, complications were observed in five patients (9.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the treatment of humeral shaft fractures extending into the proximal humerus, helical plating was associated with a higher bone union rate, better functional outcomes, and a lower postoperative complication rate compared with IMN or long straight lateral locking plates. Outcomes after nailing and long straight lateral plating were similar.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06283-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06283-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Helical plating yields better outcomes than intramedullary nailing or long straight lateral plating for humeral shaft fractures extending to the proximal humerus.
Background: This study was performed to compare the operative clinical outcomes of helical plating, intramedullary nailing (IMN), and long straight lateral plating in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures extending into the proximal humerus, as well as to identify the optimal fixation strategy for managing such injuries.
Methods: In total, 81 patients with humeral shaft fractures extending into the proximal humerus were divided into three groups based on treatment strategy: helical plating (Group A, n = 16), IMN (Group B, n = 12), and long straight lateral plating (Group C, n = 53). Preoperative demographic data and imaging were collected from the medical records. Operative time, blood transfusion, bone reduction quality, bone healing rate, and incidence of complications were recorded. Clinical evaluation included the Constant-Murley score for shoulder function, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire for upper limb function, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and assessments of shoulder stiffness or instability and patient satisfaction.
Results: Compared with Groups A and C, patients in Group B had a longer operative time and lower blood transfusion requirements. More than 80% of patients in each group achieved bone reduction quality rated as "better than good." There were no significant differences among the three groups in operative time, blood transfusion, or shaft angulation. Bone healing rates were 100%, 91.7%, and 94.3% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Mean shoulder flexion was 155.0°, 130.0°, and 150.0°, respectively. Functional outcomes, including the Constant-Murley score, DASH score, VAS score, and patient satisfaction, were significantly better in Group A than in Groups B and C. No complications occurred in Group A. One patient in Group B developed nonunion. In Group C, complications were observed in five patients (9.4%).
Conclusion: In the treatment of humeral shaft fractures extending into the proximal humerus, helical plating was associated with a higher bone union rate, better functional outcomes, and a lower postoperative complication rate compared with IMN or long straight lateral locking plates. Outcomes after nailing and long straight lateral plating were similar.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.