Joel M Le Forestier, Elizabeth Page-Gould, Alison L Chasteen
{"title":"在社交媒体上的群际接触能改善群际关系吗?在社交媒体上开发和测试纵向群体间接触场干预。","authors":"Joel M Le Forestier, Elizabeth Page-Gould, Alison L Chasteen","doi":"10.1037/xge0001840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intergroup contact may be the best known tool for reducing prejudice and improving intergroup relations. Yet, challenges inherent to studying and applying it hold the field back from answering basic questions about it definitively and undermine its applied readiness. We propose that using social media to study intergroup contact may help push contact research forward to applied readiness and help us to better understand intergroup contact itself. To do so, we present three studies totaling 4,621 observations from 646 participants and drawing on observations of 193,225 social media users that develop and test a social media-based intergroup contact intervention to reduce prejudice. We found that intergroup contact on social media was associated with less prejudice and more positive intergroup behavior cross-sectionally and longitudinally, but we did not find that manipulating the racial demographics of accounts posting to participants' real Twitter feeds had a causal effect on their intergroup attitudes or behaviors. These results suggest that although social media contexts may be fertile ground for studying and applying intergroup contact, we do not yet have evidence for an effect that is causal in nature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can intergroup contact on social media improve intergroup relations? Developing and testing a longitudinal intergroup contact field intervention on social media.\",\"authors\":\"Joel M Le Forestier, Elizabeth Page-Gould, Alison L Chasteen\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xge0001840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intergroup contact may be the best known tool for reducing prejudice and improving intergroup relations. Yet, challenges inherent to studying and applying it hold the field back from answering basic questions about it definitively and undermine its applied readiness. We propose that using social media to study intergroup contact may help push contact research forward to applied readiness and help us to better understand intergroup contact itself. To do so, we present three studies totaling 4,621 observations from 646 participants and drawing on observations of 193,225 social media users that develop and test a social media-based intergroup contact intervention to reduce prejudice. We found that intergroup contact on social media was associated with less prejudice and more positive intergroup behavior cross-sectionally and longitudinally, but we did not find that manipulating the racial demographics of accounts posting to participants' real Twitter feeds had a causal effect on their intergroup attitudes or behaviors. These results suggest that although social media contexts may be fertile ground for studying and applying intergroup contact, we do not yet have evidence for an effect that is causal in nature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001840\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001840","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
群体间接触可能是减少偏见和改善群体间关系的最著名的工具。然而,研究和应用它所固有的挑战阻碍了该领域明确地回答有关它的基本问题,并破坏了它的应用准备。我们认为,利用社交媒体研究群体间接触有助于将接触研究推向应用准备阶段,并有助于我们更好地理解群体间接触本身。为此,我们提出了三项研究,总计来自646名参与者的4,621项观察,并利用193,225名社交媒体用户的观察,开发和测试了基于社交媒体的群体间接触干预,以减少偏见。我们发现,在社交媒体上的群体间接触与更少的偏见和更积极的群体间行为相关,但我们没有发现,操纵参与者真实Twitter feed账户的种族统计数据对他们的群体间态度或行为有因果影响。这些结果表明,尽管社交媒体环境可能是研究和应用群体间接触的沃土,但我们还没有证据表明这种影响本质上是因果关系。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Can intergroup contact on social media improve intergroup relations? Developing and testing a longitudinal intergroup contact field intervention on social media.
Intergroup contact may be the best known tool for reducing prejudice and improving intergroup relations. Yet, challenges inherent to studying and applying it hold the field back from answering basic questions about it definitively and undermine its applied readiness. We propose that using social media to study intergroup contact may help push contact research forward to applied readiness and help us to better understand intergroup contact itself. To do so, we present three studies totaling 4,621 observations from 646 participants and drawing on observations of 193,225 social media users that develop and test a social media-based intergroup contact intervention to reduce prejudice. We found that intergroup contact on social media was associated with less prejudice and more positive intergroup behavior cross-sectionally and longitudinally, but we did not find that manipulating the racial demographics of accounts posting to participants' real Twitter feeds had a causal effect on their intergroup attitudes or behaviors. These results suggest that although social media contexts may be fertile ground for studying and applying intergroup contact, we do not yet have evidence for an effect that is causal in nature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General publishes articles describing empirical work that bridges the traditional interests of two or more communities of psychology. The work may touch on issues dealt with in JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, JEP: Human Perception and Performance, JEP: Animal Behavior Processes, or JEP: Applied, but may also concern issues in other subdisciplines of psychology, including social processes, developmental processes, psychopathology, neuroscience, or computational modeling. Articles in JEP: General may be longer than the usual journal publication if necessary, but shorter articles that bridge subdisciplines will also be considered.