{"title":"感知教师霸凌反应与霸凌行为:反霸凌态度的纵向中介作用","authors":"Guan-Yu Cui, Feng-Yuan Guo, Rui-Han Fu, Ya-Si Wu","doi":"10.1177/08862605251368812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As significant figures in students' lives, teachers' appropriate and effective responses to school bullying are of paramount importance in its prevention. It is imperative to understand students' viewpoints, as studies have demonstrated a negative correlation between students' bullying behaviors and their impressions of instructors' attempts to curb bullying. Furthermore, anti-bullying attitudes are also an important influencing factor for bullying behavior; therefore, this study draws upon theories such as social cognition and goal framing, from students' perspectives, to explore the mechanisms among teacher responses to bullying, bullying, and anti-bullying attitudes. The present study analyzed data from 1,560 adolescents in cross-sectional models and 365 adolescents in longitudinal models. The study's findings indicate that (a) nonintervention had a significantly positive predictive effect on bullying, supportive/relational interventions had a considerably negative predictive effect; and disciplinary methods did not significantly predict bullying; (b) anti-bullying attitudes acted as a mediating factor in the correlations between nonintervention and bullying as well as between supportive/relational interventions and bullying; (c) T2 anti-bullying attitudes played a full mediating role between T1 supportive/relational interventions and T2 bullying in our longitudinal models. By offering a theoretical foundation for later studies on school bullying, our study advances empirical research on the influence of instructors on bullying in schools. Based on the research findings, appropriate intervention strategies for teachers are suggested to help them effectively address school bullying and reduce its occurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"8862605251368812"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Teachers' Responses to Bullying and Bullying Behavior: The Longitudinal Mediational Role of Anti-bullying Attitudes.\",\"authors\":\"Guan-Yu Cui, Feng-Yuan Guo, Rui-Han Fu, Ya-Si Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08862605251368812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As significant figures in students' lives, teachers' appropriate and effective responses to school bullying are of paramount importance in its prevention. It is imperative to understand students' viewpoints, as studies have demonstrated a negative correlation between students' bullying behaviors and their impressions of instructors' attempts to curb bullying. Furthermore, anti-bullying attitudes are also an important influencing factor for bullying behavior; therefore, this study draws upon theories such as social cognition and goal framing, from students' perspectives, to explore the mechanisms among teacher responses to bullying, bullying, and anti-bullying attitudes. The present study analyzed data from 1,560 adolescents in cross-sectional models and 365 adolescents in longitudinal models. The study's findings indicate that (a) nonintervention had a significantly positive predictive effect on bullying, supportive/relational interventions had a considerably negative predictive effect; and disciplinary methods did not significantly predict bullying; (b) anti-bullying attitudes acted as a mediating factor in the correlations between nonintervention and bullying as well as between supportive/relational interventions and bullying; (c) T2 anti-bullying attitudes played a full mediating role between T1 supportive/relational interventions and T2 bullying in our longitudinal models. By offering a theoretical foundation for later studies on school bullying, our study advances empirical research on the influence of instructors on bullying in schools. Based on the research findings, appropriate intervention strategies for teachers are suggested to help them effectively address school bullying and reduce its occurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8862605251368812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251368812\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251368812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceived Teachers' Responses to Bullying and Bullying Behavior: The Longitudinal Mediational Role of Anti-bullying Attitudes.
As significant figures in students' lives, teachers' appropriate and effective responses to school bullying are of paramount importance in its prevention. It is imperative to understand students' viewpoints, as studies have demonstrated a negative correlation between students' bullying behaviors and their impressions of instructors' attempts to curb bullying. Furthermore, anti-bullying attitudes are also an important influencing factor for bullying behavior; therefore, this study draws upon theories such as social cognition and goal framing, from students' perspectives, to explore the mechanisms among teacher responses to bullying, bullying, and anti-bullying attitudes. The present study analyzed data from 1,560 adolescents in cross-sectional models and 365 adolescents in longitudinal models. The study's findings indicate that (a) nonintervention had a significantly positive predictive effect on bullying, supportive/relational interventions had a considerably negative predictive effect; and disciplinary methods did not significantly predict bullying; (b) anti-bullying attitudes acted as a mediating factor in the correlations between nonintervention and bullying as well as between supportive/relational interventions and bullying; (c) T2 anti-bullying attitudes played a full mediating role between T1 supportive/relational interventions and T2 bullying in our longitudinal models. By offering a theoretical foundation for later studies on school bullying, our study advances empirical research on the influence of instructors on bullying in schools. Based on the research findings, appropriate intervention strategies for teachers are suggested to help them effectively address school bullying and reduce its occurrence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.