{"title":"颈动脉超声造影评估高松动脉炎活动性的meta分析。","authors":"Liwen Zhu, Shipei Xu, Jiqing Xuan","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of carotid contrast ultrasonography (CEUS) for disease activity in Takayasu arteritis (TAK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic reviews were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science using the following search terms: Takayasu Arteritis, aortic arch syndrome, pulseless disease, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, and CEUS. Studies published from the beginning up until October 2024 were collected. Two researchers performed screening, full-text review, and data extraction. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine articles involving 498 patients and 704 carotid artery examinations were included in the study. The combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve of CEUS for detecting TAK disease activity were 0.80 (0.76-0.83), 0.71 (0.67-0.74), 3.87 (2.41-6.21), 0.31 (0.22-0.42), 21.87 (11.32-42.23), and 0.8941, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The assessment of TAK activity using CEUS has certain sensitivity and specificity; as a result, it can be used to judge the condition of patients with TAK and the treatment effect to provide a more comprehensive and reliable objective basis for clinical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis of Carotid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography to Assess the Activity of Takayasu Arteritis.\",\"authors\":\"Liwen Zhu, Shipei Xu, Jiqing Xuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcu.70097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of carotid contrast ultrasonography (CEUS) for disease activity in Takayasu arteritis (TAK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic reviews were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science using the following search terms: Takayasu Arteritis, aortic arch syndrome, pulseless disease, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, and CEUS. Studies published from the beginning up until October 2024 were collected. Two researchers performed screening, full-text review, and data extraction. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine articles involving 498 patients and 704 carotid artery examinations were included in the study. The combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve of CEUS for detecting TAK disease activity were 0.80 (0.76-0.83), 0.71 (0.67-0.74), 3.87 (2.41-6.21), 0.31 (0.22-0.42), 21.87 (11.32-42.23), and 0.8941, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The assessment of TAK activity using CEUS has certain sensitivity and specificity; as a result, it can be used to judge the condition of patients with TAK and the treatment effect to provide a more comprehensive and reliable objective basis for clinical treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70097\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Meta-Analysis of Carotid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography to Assess the Activity of Takayasu Arteritis.
Objectives: This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of carotid contrast ultrasonography (CEUS) for disease activity in Takayasu arteritis (TAK).
Methods: Systematic reviews were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science using the following search terms: Takayasu Arteritis, aortic arch syndrome, pulseless disease, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, and CEUS. Studies published from the beginning up until October 2024 were collected. Two researchers performed screening, full-text review, and data extraction. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis.
Results: Nine articles involving 498 patients and 704 carotid artery examinations were included in the study. The combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve of CEUS for detecting TAK disease activity were 0.80 (0.76-0.83), 0.71 (0.67-0.74), 3.87 (2.41-6.21), 0.31 (0.22-0.42), 21.87 (11.32-42.23), and 0.8941, respectively.
Conclusion: The assessment of TAK activity using CEUS has certain sensitivity and specificity; as a result, it can be used to judge the condition of patients with TAK and the treatment effect to provide a more comprehensive and reliable objective basis for clinical treatment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography.
The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents.
JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.