应用生态指标敏感性分布(EcoSD)评价草原区土壤毒死蜱风险

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hamzat O Fajana, Adedamola A Adedokun, Philip A Abiolu, Olukayode O Jegede, Eric G Lamb, Steven D Siciliano
{"title":"应用生态指标敏感性分布(EcoSD)评价草原区土壤毒死蜱风险","authors":"Hamzat O Fajana, Adedamola A Adedokun, Philip A Abiolu, Olukayode O Jegede, Eric G Lamb, Steven D Siciliano","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prescribed fire and grazing can enhance soil ecosystem functions in grasslands but may also induce ecological stress on soil function, making soil more vulnerable to chemical stressors like pesticides, which contaminate grasslands via aerial spray drift. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of prescribed fire-grazing history and chlorpyrifos toxicity on selected soil quality parameters and ecological indicators \"eco-indicators\" in a fescue prairie grassland soil. Burnt soil from area subjected to prescribed fire in 2017 and annual cattle grazing and unburnt reference soil from adjacent areas subjected to grazing alone were collected in 2021 and exposed to varying doses of chlorpyrifos. Results showed no interactive effect of fire-grazing and chlorpyrifos toxicity on the measured soil quality parameters and eco-indicators. While the fire-grazing effect in the burnt soil significantly enhanced soil quality parameters like base cations and available nitrogen, it exacerbated chlorpyrifos toxicity on key soil eco-indicators like Oribatid mites and soil extracellular enzyme, acid phosphatase. Based on the Eco-indicator Sensitivity Distribution (EcoSD) framework, the burnt soil with history of fire and grazing, was generally susceptible to chlorpyrifos with ecological hazard concentrations at 5% (HC5Eco) to 50% (HC50Eco) ranging from 0.08-1.5 mg/kg compared to 0.5-4.0 mg/kg in the unburnt soil with grazing history alone. Regardless of the fire treatment, arylamidase, an enzyme crucial for nitrogen mineralization, was the most sensitive soil eco-indicator to chlorpyrifos toxicity. These findings suggest that fire, in combination with grazing, may increase the susceptibility of soil eco-indicators to chlorpyrifos toxicity, potentially due to changes in organic matter quality or increased stress from pyric byproducts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying Eco-indicator Sensitivity Distribution (EcoSD) to Evaluate Chlorpyrifos Risk in Grassland Soils with Prescribed Fire and Grazing History.\",\"authors\":\"Hamzat O Fajana, Adedamola A Adedokun, Philip A Abiolu, Olukayode O Jegede, Eric G Lamb, Steven D Siciliano\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prescribed fire and grazing can enhance soil ecosystem functions in grasslands but may also induce ecological stress on soil function, making soil more vulnerable to chemical stressors like pesticides, which contaminate grasslands via aerial spray drift. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of prescribed fire-grazing history and chlorpyrifos toxicity on selected soil quality parameters and ecological indicators \\\"eco-indicators\\\" in a fescue prairie grassland soil. Burnt soil from area subjected to prescribed fire in 2017 and annual cattle grazing and unburnt reference soil from adjacent areas subjected to grazing alone were collected in 2021 and exposed to varying doses of chlorpyrifos. Results showed no interactive effect of fire-grazing and chlorpyrifos toxicity on the measured soil quality parameters and eco-indicators. While the fire-grazing effect in the burnt soil significantly enhanced soil quality parameters like base cations and available nitrogen, it exacerbated chlorpyrifos toxicity on key soil eco-indicators like Oribatid mites and soil extracellular enzyme, acid phosphatase. Based on the Eco-indicator Sensitivity Distribution (EcoSD) framework, the burnt soil with history of fire and grazing, was generally susceptible to chlorpyrifos with ecological hazard concentrations at 5% (HC5Eco) to 50% (HC50Eco) ranging from 0.08-1.5 mg/kg compared to 0.5-4.0 mg/kg in the unburnt soil with grazing history alone. Regardless of the fire treatment, arylamidase, an enzyme crucial for nitrogen mineralization, was the most sensitive soil eco-indicator to chlorpyrifos toxicity. These findings suggest that fire, in combination with grazing, may increase the susceptibility of soil eco-indicators to chlorpyrifos toxicity, potentially due to changes in organic matter quality or increased stress from pyric byproducts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

规定的火灾和放牧可以增强草原土壤生态系统功能,但也可能引起土壤功能的生态应激,使土壤更容易受到农药等化学应激源的影响,这些化学应激源通过空中喷雾漂移污染草原。因此,本研究考察了规定的火放牧历史和毒死蜱毒性对羊茅草原土壤质量参数和生态指标(“生态指标”)的影响。研究人员于2021年收集了2017年规定火灾地区的烧焦土壤和邻近地区仅放牧的未烧焦对照土壤,并暴露于不同剂量的毒死蜱。结果表明,放牧与毒死蜱毒性对土壤质量参数和生态指标无交互作用。火烧效应显著提高了土壤碱阳离子和速效氮等土壤质量参数,但加重了毒死蜱对甲螨和土壤胞外酶、酸性磷酸酶等关键土壤生态指标的毒性。基于生态指标敏感性分布(EcoSD)框架,具有火灾和放牧历史的烧焦土壤对毒死蜱的生态危害浓度为5% (HC5Eco) ~ 50% (HC50Eco),范围为0.08 ~ 1.5 mg/kg,而仅具有放牧历史的未烧焦土壤对毒死蜱的生态危害浓度为0.5 ~ 4.0 mg/kg。在不同处理条件下,对氮素矿化至关重要的芳基酰胺酶是对毒死蜱毒性最敏感的土壤生态指标。这些发现表明,火灾与放牧相结合,可能会增加土壤生态指标对毒死蜱毒性的敏感性,这可能是由于有机质质量的变化或pyric副产品压力的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying Eco-indicator Sensitivity Distribution (EcoSD) to Evaluate Chlorpyrifos Risk in Grassland Soils with Prescribed Fire and Grazing History.

Prescribed fire and grazing can enhance soil ecosystem functions in grasslands but may also induce ecological stress on soil function, making soil more vulnerable to chemical stressors like pesticides, which contaminate grasslands via aerial spray drift. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of prescribed fire-grazing history and chlorpyrifos toxicity on selected soil quality parameters and ecological indicators "eco-indicators" in a fescue prairie grassland soil. Burnt soil from area subjected to prescribed fire in 2017 and annual cattle grazing and unburnt reference soil from adjacent areas subjected to grazing alone were collected in 2021 and exposed to varying doses of chlorpyrifos. Results showed no interactive effect of fire-grazing and chlorpyrifos toxicity on the measured soil quality parameters and eco-indicators. While the fire-grazing effect in the burnt soil significantly enhanced soil quality parameters like base cations and available nitrogen, it exacerbated chlorpyrifos toxicity on key soil eco-indicators like Oribatid mites and soil extracellular enzyme, acid phosphatase. Based on the Eco-indicator Sensitivity Distribution (EcoSD) framework, the burnt soil with history of fire and grazing, was generally susceptible to chlorpyrifos with ecological hazard concentrations at 5% (HC5Eco) to 50% (HC50Eco) ranging from 0.08-1.5 mg/kg compared to 0.5-4.0 mg/kg in the unburnt soil with grazing history alone. Regardless of the fire treatment, arylamidase, an enzyme crucial for nitrogen mineralization, was the most sensitive soil eco-indicator to chlorpyrifos toxicity. These findings suggest that fire, in combination with grazing, may increase the susceptibility of soil eco-indicators to chlorpyrifos toxicity, potentially due to changes in organic matter quality or increased stress from pyric byproducts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信