-受体阻滞剂在保留射血分数的心肌梗死后患者中的应用:综述。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Darshilkumar Maheta, Vedanshi Sandip Shah, Siddharth Pravin Agrawal, Saptak Mankad, Dhruvi Joshi, Srushti Sahukar, Hritvik Jain, Anjaneyulu Dunde, William H Frishman, Wilbert S Aronow
{"title":"-受体阻滞剂在保留射血分数的心肌梗死后患者中的应用:综述。","authors":"Darshilkumar Maheta, Vedanshi Sandip Shah, Siddharth Pravin Agrawal, Saptak Mankad, Dhruvi Joshi, Srushti Sahukar, Hritvik Jain, Anjaneyulu Dunde, William H Frishman, Wilbert S Aronow","doi":"10.1097/CRD.0000000000001066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Beta-adrenergic blockers [beta-blockers (BBs)] have long been a cornerstone of therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) based on early trials showing reduced mortality. However, their role in patients who recover from MI with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is increasingly debated in the modern era of reperfusion and contemporary medical therapy. We reviewed randomized controlled trials, observational studies, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines regarding BB use in post-MI patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction (normal LVEF) and preserved ejection fraction (EF), acknowledging a lack of evidence in this subgroup. In patients with MI without reduced LVEF, long-term BB therapy has not demonstrated clear outcome benefits in the contemporary era. BBs remain indicated for those with reduced LVEF (≤40%), heart failure, arrhythmias, or ongoing ischemia, but routine continuation in all post-MI patients with normal EF may be unnecessary. Ongoing trials should further clarify which patients benefit from BBs after MI. Clinicians should individualize decisions, considering potential side effects and patient comorbidities, and current guidelines suggest re-evaluating the need for BBs in stable post-MI patients with preserved EF.</p>","PeriodicalId":9549,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beta-Blocker Use in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Review.\",\"authors\":\"Darshilkumar Maheta, Vedanshi Sandip Shah, Siddharth Pravin Agrawal, Saptak Mankad, Dhruvi Joshi, Srushti Sahukar, Hritvik Jain, Anjaneyulu Dunde, William H Frishman, Wilbert S Aronow\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CRD.0000000000001066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Beta-adrenergic blockers [beta-blockers (BBs)] have long been a cornerstone of therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) based on early trials showing reduced mortality. However, their role in patients who recover from MI with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is increasingly debated in the modern era of reperfusion and contemporary medical therapy. We reviewed randomized controlled trials, observational studies, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines regarding BB use in post-MI patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction (normal LVEF) and preserved ejection fraction (EF), acknowledging a lack of evidence in this subgroup. In patients with MI without reduced LVEF, long-term BB therapy has not demonstrated clear outcome benefits in the contemporary era. BBs remain indicated for those with reduced LVEF (≤40%), heart failure, arrhythmias, or ongoing ischemia, but routine continuation in all post-MI patients with normal EF may be unnecessary. Ongoing trials should further clarify which patients benefit from BBs after MI. Clinicians should individualize decisions, considering potential side effects and patient comorbidities, and current guidelines suggest re-evaluating the need for BBs in stable post-MI patients with preserved EF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology in Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology in Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000001066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000001066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

-肾上腺素能阻滞剂[-阻滞剂(BBs)]长期以来一直是心肌梗死(MI)后治疗的基础,基于早期试验显示降低死亡率。然而,在现代再灌注时代和当代医学治疗中,它们在心肌梗死后保留左室射血分数(LVEF)的患者中所起的作用越来越受到争论。我们回顾了随机对照试验、观察性研究、荟萃分析和关于心肌梗死后无左室收缩功能障碍(LVEF正常)和保留射血分数(EF)的患者使用BB的临床指南,承认在这一亚组中缺乏证据。在没有降低LVEF的心肌梗死患者中,长期BB治疗在当代尚未显示出明确的结果益处。对于那些LVEF降低(≤40%)、心力衰竭、心律失常或持续缺血的患者,仍然适用BBs,但对于所有正常EF的心肌梗死后患者,可能没有必要常规继续使用BBs。正在进行的试验应进一步明确心肌梗死后哪些患者受益于BBs。临床医生应个性化决策,考虑潜在的副作用和患者合并症,目前的指南建议重新评估心肌梗死后保留EF的稳定患者对BBs的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beta-Blocker Use in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Review.

Beta-adrenergic blockers [beta-blockers (BBs)] have long been a cornerstone of therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) based on early trials showing reduced mortality. However, their role in patients who recover from MI with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is increasingly debated in the modern era of reperfusion and contemporary medical therapy. We reviewed randomized controlled trials, observational studies, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines regarding BB use in post-MI patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction (normal LVEF) and preserved ejection fraction (EF), acknowledging a lack of evidence in this subgroup. In patients with MI without reduced LVEF, long-term BB therapy has not demonstrated clear outcome benefits in the contemporary era. BBs remain indicated for those with reduced LVEF (≤40%), heart failure, arrhythmias, or ongoing ischemia, but routine continuation in all post-MI patients with normal EF may be unnecessary. Ongoing trials should further clarify which patients benefit from BBs after MI. Clinicians should individualize decisions, considering potential side effects and patient comorbidities, and current guidelines suggest re-evaluating the need for BBs in stable post-MI patients with preserved EF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology in Review
Cardiology in Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Cardiology in Review is to publish reviews on topics of current interest in cardiology that will foster increased understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical course, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Articles of the highest quality are written by authorities in the field and published promptly in a readable format with visual appeal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信