Qinghua Niu, Shiyun Yang, Lianfang Du, Chao Jia, Gang Li, Yingyu Cai, An Chen, Fan Li
{"title":"对比增强超声在鉴别病理性乳头溢液患者病变中的额外作用:一项与DCE-MRI比较的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Qinghua Niu, Shiyun Yang, Lianfang Du, Chao Jia, Gang Li, Yingyu Cai, An Chen, Fan Li","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the auxiliary role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the etiological diagnosis of pathological nipple discharge (PND) and compare its effectiveness with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study conducted from March 2021 to February 2024, PND patients underwent breast ultrasound and DCE-MRI after initial history and physical examination. Lesions were categorized as mass or non-mass-like on baseline US and assessed for vascularity using color Doppler. CEUS was utilized to refine the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification. Logistic regression identified risk factors, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 116 lesions from 112 PND patients were analyzed. CEUS-assisted ultrasound showed increased specificity (ranging from 50.0% to 80.0% compared to US alone, p = 0.009) while maintaining sensitivity. Of the 81 patients who underwent DCE-MRI, CEUS demonstrated a higher positive predictive value (83.3% vs. 75.5%), with comparable negative predictive values (97.0% vs. 96.4%). CEUS was particularly effective in accurately diagnosing benign lesions that were overestimated by DCE-MRI and in identifying ductal carcinoma in situ with greater precision than US alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The auxiliary use of CEUS with ultrasound improves the specificity and positive predictive value in diagnosing PND-associated malignancies and serves as a valuable secondary imaging method to DCE-MRI, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>CEUS can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of PND, effectively differentiating benign from malignant lesions, and its integration into clinical practice could offer significant benefits in patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The additional role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in identifying lesions in pathological nipple discharge patients: a prospective study comparing with DCE-MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Qinghua Niu, Shiyun Yang, Lianfang Du, Chao Jia, Gang Li, Yingyu Cai, An Chen, Fan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the auxiliary role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the etiological diagnosis of pathological nipple discharge (PND) and compare its effectiveness with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study conducted from March 2021 to February 2024, PND patients underwent breast ultrasound and DCE-MRI after initial history and physical examination. Lesions were categorized as mass or non-mass-like on baseline US and assessed for vascularity using color Doppler. CEUS was utilized to refine the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification. Logistic regression identified risk factors, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 116 lesions from 112 PND patients were analyzed. CEUS-assisted ultrasound showed increased specificity (ranging from 50.0% to 80.0% compared to US alone, p = 0.009) while maintaining sensitivity. Of the 81 patients who underwent DCE-MRI, CEUS demonstrated a higher positive predictive value (83.3% vs. 75.5%), with comparable negative predictive values (97.0% vs. 96.4%). CEUS was particularly effective in accurately diagnosing benign lesions that were overestimated by DCE-MRI and in identifying ductal carcinoma in situ with greater precision than US alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The auxiliary use of CEUS with ultrasound improves the specificity and positive predictive value in diagnosing PND-associated malignancies and serves as a valuable secondary imaging method to DCE-MRI, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>CEUS can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of PND, effectively differentiating benign from malignant lesions, and its integration into clinical practice could offer significant benefits in patient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The additional role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in identifying lesions in pathological nipple discharge patients: a prospective study comparing with DCE-MRI.
Objective: To evaluate the auxiliary role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the etiological diagnosis of pathological nipple discharge (PND) and compare its effectiveness with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).
Methods: In this prospective study conducted from March 2021 to February 2024, PND patients underwent breast ultrasound and DCE-MRI after initial history and physical examination. Lesions were categorized as mass or non-mass-like on baseline US and assessed for vascularity using color Doppler. CEUS was utilized to refine the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification. Logistic regression identified risk factors, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Results: A total of 116 lesions from 112 PND patients were analyzed. CEUS-assisted ultrasound showed increased specificity (ranging from 50.0% to 80.0% compared to US alone, p = 0.009) while maintaining sensitivity. Of the 81 patients who underwent DCE-MRI, CEUS demonstrated a higher positive predictive value (83.3% vs. 75.5%), with comparable negative predictive values (97.0% vs. 96.4%). CEUS was particularly effective in accurately diagnosing benign lesions that were overestimated by DCE-MRI and in identifying ductal carcinoma in situ with greater precision than US alone.
Conclusion: The auxiliary use of CEUS with ultrasound improves the specificity and positive predictive value in diagnosing PND-associated malignancies and serves as a valuable secondary imaging method to DCE-MRI, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions.
Advances in knowledge: CEUS can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of PND, effectively differentiating benign from malignant lesions, and its integration into clinical practice could offer significant benefits in patient management.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option