释放训练的潜力:增强背景实质增强评估的读者间协议。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Danping Huang, Sina Wang, Zhendong Luo, Lijun Chen, Hui Zeng, Fengxia Zeng, Jialing Liu, Weimin Xu, Genggeng Qin
{"title":"释放训练的潜力:增强背景实质增强评估的读者间协议。","authors":"Danping Huang, Sina Wang, Zhendong Luo, Lijun Chen, Hui Zeng, Fengxia Zeng, Jialing Liu, Weimin Xu, Genggeng Qin","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the inter-reader agreement of visual background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) assessment and determine if training can improve this assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred and forty-eight women who underwent contrast-enhanced mammography from 2018 through 2022 were included. A total of 2135 images were read by six radiologists (Group A) independently and rated BPE with the ordinal scale: minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. After a dedicated training, the same cases were reread in a new random order within two weeks. To further verify the effectiveness of training, four radiologists (Group B) from four different institutions were invited to assess BPE in the same way with 800 images. The accuracy of each reader and agreement on BPE categorization between radiologists and the reference standard were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of correct BPE assignments increased from 62.3% (range, 48.6%-73.6%) to 75.5% (range, 69.0%-79.7%) after training in Group A, and increased from 55.7% (range, 52.0%-58.9%) to 66.9% (range, 62.0%-71.0%) after training in Group B. With training, inter-reader agreement increased from fair to moderate in both Group A (κ  =  0.32 to 0.52) and Group B (κ  =  0.40 to 0.53), indicating readers learned and the training can be rolled out to different institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The initial inter-reader agreement in assessing BPE among radiologists was fair but showed enhancement following training, highlighting the necessity of training and standard sets of reference images that should be made available for training.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study demonstrates that dedicated training improves inter-reader agreement in BPE assessment on CEM, highlighting the need for standardized training programs to enhance consistency in clinical practice and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking the Potential of Training: Enhancing Inter-reader Agreement in Background Parenchymal Enhancement Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Danping Huang, Sina Wang, Zhendong Luo, Lijun Chen, Hui Zeng, Fengxia Zeng, Jialing Liu, Weimin Xu, Genggeng Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the inter-reader agreement of visual background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) assessment and determine if training can improve this assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred and forty-eight women who underwent contrast-enhanced mammography from 2018 through 2022 were included. A total of 2135 images were read by six radiologists (Group A) independently and rated BPE with the ordinal scale: minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. After a dedicated training, the same cases were reread in a new random order within two weeks. To further verify the effectiveness of training, four radiologists (Group B) from four different institutions were invited to assess BPE in the same way with 800 images. The accuracy of each reader and agreement on BPE categorization between radiologists and the reference standard were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of correct BPE assignments increased from 62.3% (range, 48.6%-73.6%) to 75.5% (range, 69.0%-79.7%) after training in Group A, and increased from 55.7% (range, 52.0%-58.9%) to 66.9% (range, 62.0%-71.0%) after training in Group B. With training, inter-reader agreement increased from fair to moderate in both Group A (κ  =  0.32 to 0.52) and Group B (κ  =  0.40 to 0.53), indicating readers learned and the training can be rolled out to different institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The initial inter-reader agreement in assessing BPE among radiologists was fair but showed enhancement following training, highlighting the necessity of training and standard sets of reference images that should be made available for training.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study demonstrates that dedicated training improves inter-reader agreement in BPE assessment on CEM, highlighting the need for standardized training programs to enhance consistency in clinical practice and research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf240\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估视觉背景实质增强(BPE)评估的读者间一致性,并确定训练是否可以改善该评估。方法:纳入2018年至2022年期间接受对比增强乳房x光检查的548名女性。共有2135张图像由6名放射科医生(A组)独立阅读,并按顺序对BPE进行评分:最低、轻度、中度或标记。经过专门的训练后,同样的案例在两周内以新的随机顺序重读。为了进一步验证培训的有效性,来自四个不同机构的四名放射科医生(B组)被邀请以相同的方式对800张图像进行BPE评估。评估每位读者的准确性以及放射科医师与参考标准之间对BPE分类的一致性。结果:A组的BPE作业正确率从62.3%(范围,48.6% ~ 73.6%)提高到75.5%(范围,69.0% ~ 79.7%),B组的BPE作业正确率从55.7%(范围,52.0% ~ 58.9%)提高到66.9%(范围,62.0% ~ 71.0%)。经过培训,A组(κ = 0.32 ~ 0.52)和B组(κ = 0.40 ~ 0.53)的读者间一致性都从一般提高到中等,说明读者学会了,培训可以推广到不同的机构。结论:在评估放射科医师BPE时,最初的读者间共识是公平的,但在培训后表现出增强,强调了培训的必要性和应提供的标准参考图像集用于培训。知识的进步:本研究表明,专门的培训提高了对CEM的BPE评估的读者之间的一致性,强调了标准化培训计划的必要性,以提高临床实践和研究的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unlocking the Potential of Training: Enhancing Inter-reader Agreement in Background Parenchymal Enhancement Assessment.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the inter-reader agreement of visual background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) assessment and determine if training can improve this assessment.

Methods: Five hundred and forty-eight women who underwent contrast-enhanced mammography from 2018 through 2022 were included. A total of 2135 images were read by six radiologists (Group A) independently and rated BPE with the ordinal scale: minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. After a dedicated training, the same cases were reread in a new random order within two weeks. To further verify the effectiveness of training, four radiologists (Group B) from four different institutions were invited to assess BPE in the same way with 800 images. The accuracy of each reader and agreement on BPE categorization between radiologists and the reference standard were evaluated.

Results: The percentage of correct BPE assignments increased from 62.3% (range, 48.6%-73.6%) to 75.5% (range, 69.0%-79.7%) after training in Group A, and increased from 55.7% (range, 52.0%-58.9%) to 66.9% (range, 62.0%-71.0%) after training in Group B. With training, inter-reader agreement increased from fair to moderate in both Group A (κ  =  0.32 to 0.52) and Group B (κ  =  0.40 to 0.53), indicating readers learned and the training can be rolled out to different institutions.

Conclusion: The initial inter-reader agreement in assessing BPE among radiologists was fair but showed enhancement following training, highlighting the necessity of training and standard sets of reference images that should be made available for training.

Advances in knowledge: This study demonstrates that dedicated training improves inter-reader agreement in BPE assessment on CEM, highlighting the need for standardized training programs to enhance consistency in clinical practice and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信