{"title":"ICBCCR:在278703个多中心真实队列中协调和临床验证的新途径","authors":"Penghui Zhang, Zhiwu Dong, Yingting Wu, Lufei Jiang, Huiling Fang, Xue Yuan, Houqun Ying, Chong Chen, Xin Chang, Xinxin Ren, Manman Zhang, Wenqing Chu, Lianxiang Xing, Keliang Huang, Weiyi Wu, Yuqing Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2025.120632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we aimed to develop a novel harmonization algorithm to achieve the conversion from current results to harmonized results directly and perform a clinical verification on a multi-center real-world cohort of 278,703.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patient samples were collected as harmonization reference materials to develop and internally validate the harmonization algorithm. We assessed the harmonization effectiveness through multiple dimensions such as method comparison and evaluation. Then, the harmonization algorithm was performed on 278,703 sample results. We compared the distributions of the harmonized results from different in vitro diagnostic measurement devices through the Bhattacharyya distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After harmonized by the novel algorithm, equivalent results were obtained among 5 in vitro diagnostic measurement devices for MYO with mean percent differences from -1.5 % to -0.1 % and the 95 % limits of agreement from 14.1 % to 20.3 % and for CK-MB with mean percent differences from -0.2 % to 1.1 % and the 95 % limits of agreement from 14.5 % to 36.6 %. The coefficients of variation of the results for the same sample presented a significant decrease from 20.6 % to 4.6 % for MYO and from 38.6 % to 5.3 % for CK-MB. Furthermore, after the harmonization algorithm was performed on 278,703 sample results from the real world, the Bhattacharyya distance decreased from 0.0046 to 0.0019 for MYO and from 0.0949 to 0.0049 for CK-MB after harmonization, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel algorithm is a new path for harmonization only based on current results and its clinical applicability has been fully verified in the real world.</p>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":" ","pages":"120632"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICBCCR: A new path for harmonization and clinical verification on a multi-center real-world cohort of 278703.\",\"authors\":\"Penghui Zhang, Zhiwu Dong, Yingting Wu, Lufei Jiang, Huiling Fang, Xue Yuan, Houqun Ying, Chong Chen, Xin Chang, Xinxin Ren, Manman Zhang, Wenqing Chu, Lianxiang Xing, Keliang Huang, Weiyi Wu, Yuqing Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cca.2025.120632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we aimed to develop a novel harmonization algorithm to achieve the conversion from current results to harmonized results directly and perform a clinical verification on a multi-center real-world cohort of 278,703.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patient samples were collected as harmonization reference materials to develop and internally validate the harmonization algorithm. We assessed the harmonization effectiveness through multiple dimensions such as method comparison and evaluation. Then, the harmonization algorithm was performed on 278,703 sample results. We compared the distributions of the harmonized results from different in vitro diagnostic measurement devices through the Bhattacharyya distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After harmonized by the novel algorithm, equivalent results were obtained among 5 in vitro diagnostic measurement devices for MYO with mean percent differences from -1.5 % to -0.1 % and the 95 % limits of agreement from 14.1 % to 20.3 % and for CK-MB with mean percent differences from -0.2 % to 1.1 % and the 95 % limits of agreement from 14.5 % to 36.6 %. The coefficients of variation of the results for the same sample presented a significant decrease from 20.6 % to 4.6 % for MYO and from 38.6 % to 5.3 % for CK-MB. Furthermore, after the harmonization algorithm was performed on 278,703 sample results from the real world, the Bhattacharyya distance decreased from 0.0046 to 0.0019 for MYO and from 0.0949 to 0.0049 for CK-MB after harmonization, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel algorithm is a new path for harmonization only based on current results and its clinical applicability has been fully verified in the real world.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica Chimica Acta\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"120632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica Chimica Acta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2025.120632\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2025.120632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
ICBCCR: A new path for harmonization and clinical verification on a multi-center real-world cohort of 278703.
Background: In this study, we aimed to develop a novel harmonization algorithm to achieve the conversion from current results to harmonized results directly and perform a clinical verification on a multi-center real-world cohort of 278,703.
Methods: Sixty patient samples were collected as harmonization reference materials to develop and internally validate the harmonization algorithm. We assessed the harmonization effectiveness through multiple dimensions such as method comparison and evaluation. Then, the harmonization algorithm was performed on 278,703 sample results. We compared the distributions of the harmonized results from different in vitro diagnostic measurement devices through the Bhattacharyya distance.
Results: After harmonized by the novel algorithm, equivalent results were obtained among 5 in vitro diagnostic measurement devices for MYO with mean percent differences from -1.5 % to -0.1 % and the 95 % limits of agreement from 14.1 % to 20.3 % and for CK-MB with mean percent differences from -0.2 % to 1.1 % and the 95 % limits of agreement from 14.5 % to 36.6 %. The coefficients of variation of the results for the same sample presented a significant decrease from 20.6 % to 4.6 % for MYO and from 38.6 % to 5.3 % for CK-MB. Furthermore, after the harmonization algorithm was performed on 278,703 sample results from the real world, the Bhattacharyya distance decreased from 0.0046 to 0.0019 for MYO and from 0.0949 to 0.0049 for CK-MB after harmonization, respectively.
Conclusions: The novel algorithm is a new path for harmonization only based on current results and its clinical applicability has been fully verified in the real world.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC)
Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells.
The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.