COVID-19大流行期间美国家庭和社区服务使用的变化和未满足的需求

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Romil R Parikh, Tetyana P Shippee, Jack M Wolf, Benjamin Langworthy, Chanee D Fabius, Janette Dill, Dana Urbanski, Stephanie Giordano, Eric Jutkowitz
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间美国家庭和社区服务使用的变化和未满足的需求","authors":"Romil R Parikh, Tetyana P Shippee, Jack M Wolf, Benjamin Langworthy, Chanee D Fabius, Janette Dill, Dana Urbanski, Stephanie Giordano, Eric Jutkowitz","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-06396-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 4 million older adults in the United States use publicly funded home-and community-based services (HCBS) which were disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is paucity of empirical evidence of how service disruptions influenced consumer needs in different types of HCBS. Therefore, we evaluate changes in service use and consumer-reported unmet service needs in HCBS during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021-2022) versus pre-pandemic (2018-2019), to inform future public health emergency (PHE) preparedness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed repeated cross-sectional survey data from the National Core Indicators- Aging and Disability Adult Consumer Survey in two survey waves, 2018-2019 and 2021-2022. We included community-dwelling, older HCBS consumers (age ≥ 65 years; n = 7143) from 11 states that participated in both survey waves. We measured service use and consumer-reported unmet needs as outcomes for six commonly used HCBS including personal care, homemaker, meal delivery, adult day, transportation, and caregiver respite/support. Using logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to evaluate changes in outcomes during versus pre-pandemic, adjusting for demographics, health-related variables, and self- versus proxy-response, with random intercepts for each state.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to 2018-2019, during 2021-2022, odds of service use increased for personal care (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.09, 1.40) and caregiver respite/support (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00, 1.63) but decreased for homemaker services (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60, 0.79) and meal delivery (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70, 0.93). During the PHE, odds of unmet service needs increased for personal care (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03, 1.46) and meal delivery (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.56), and decreased for caregiver respite/support (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the PHE, simultaneous increase in services use and unmet service needs for some HCBS (e.g. personal care) suggests that temporary PHE measures taken were insufficient to offset the demand for those services. For caregiver respite/support, increased service use and decreased unmet service needs suggests that the temporary PHE measures for caregiver support may have offset a rise in service demand. These findings can inform evaluations of temporary PHE policies for HCBS and disaster preparedness efforts for future PHEs.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"733"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in service use and unmet needs in home- and community- based services in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Romil R Parikh, Tetyana P Shippee, Jack M Wolf, Benjamin Langworthy, Chanee D Fabius, Janette Dill, Dana Urbanski, Stephanie Giordano, Eric Jutkowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-025-06396-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 4 million older adults in the United States use publicly funded home-and community-based services (HCBS) which were disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is paucity of empirical evidence of how service disruptions influenced consumer needs in different types of HCBS. Therefore, we evaluate changes in service use and consumer-reported unmet service needs in HCBS during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021-2022) versus pre-pandemic (2018-2019), to inform future public health emergency (PHE) preparedness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed repeated cross-sectional survey data from the National Core Indicators- Aging and Disability Adult Consumer Survey in two survey waves, 2018-2019 and 2021-2022. We included community-dwelling, older HCBS consumers (age ≥ 65 years; n = 7143) from 11 states that participated in both survey waves. We measured service use and consumer-reported unmet needs as outcomes for six commonly used HCBS including personal care, homemaker, meal delivery, adult day, transportation, and caregiver respite/support. Using logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to evaluate changes in outcomes during versus pre-pandemic, adjusting for demographics, health-related variables, and self- versus proxy-response, with random intercepts for each state.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to 2018-2019, during 2021-2022, odds of service use increased for personal care (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.09, 1.40) and caregiver respite/support (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00, 1.63) but decreased for homemaker services (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60, 0.79) and meal delivery (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70, 0.93). During the PHE, odds of unmet service needs increased for personal care (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03, 1.46) and meal delivery (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.56), and decreased for caregiver respite/support (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the PHE, simultaneous increase in services use and unmet service needs for some HCBS (e.g. personal care) suggests that temporary PHE measures taken were insufficient to offset the demand for those services. For caregiver respite/support, increased service use and decreased unmet service needs suggests that the temporary PHE measures for caregiver support may have offset a rise in service demand. These findings can inform evaluations of temporary PHE policies for HCBS and disaster preparedness efforts for future PHEs.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481764/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06396-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06396-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国有400多万老年人使用公共资助的家庭和社区服务(HCBS),这些服务在COVID-19大流行期间中断。关于服务中断如何影响不同类型HCBS的消费者需求,缺乏经验证据。因此,我们评估了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间(2021-2022年)与大流行前(2018-2019年)相比,HCBS服务使用和消费者报告的未满足服务需求的变化,为未来的突发公共卫生事件(PHE)准备提供信息。方法:我们分析了2018-2019年和2021-2022年两轮全国核心指标-老龄化和残疾成人消费者调查的重复横断面调查数据。我们纳入了来自11个州的社区居住的老年HCBS消费者(年龄≥65岁;n = 7143),他们参加了两次调查。我们测量了服务使用和消费者报告的未满足需求作为六种常用HCBS的结果,包括个人护理、家庭主妇、送餐、成人日、交通和护理人员休息/支持。使用逻辑回归,我们计算了调整后的优势比(aOR)和95%置信区间(CI),以评估大流行期间与前的结果变化,调整了人口统计学、健康相关变量和自我与代理反应,并对每个州进行了随机截取。结果:与2018-2019年相比,2021-2022年期间,个人护理(aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.09, 1.40)和护理人员休息/支持(aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00, 1.63)的服务使用几率增加,但家政服务(OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60, 0.79)和送餐(aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70, 0.93)的服务使用几率下降。在PHE期间,未满足服务需求的几率在个人护理(aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03, 1.46)和送餐(aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.56)方面增加,在护理人员休息/支持方面减少(aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.70)。结论:在PHE期间,一些HCBS(如个人护理)的服务使用和未满足的服务需求同时增加,表明采取的临时PHE措施不足以抵消对这些服务的需求。对于护理人员的喘息/支持,服务使用的增加和未满足的服务需求的减少表明,公共卫生部对护理人员支持的临时措施可能抵消了服务需求的增加。这些发现可以为评估hcb的临时公共卫生政策和未来公共卫生机构的备灾工作提供信息。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Changes in service use and unmet needs in home- and community- based services in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Changes in service use and unmet needs in home- and community- based services in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Changes in service use and unmet needs in home- and community- based services in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: More than 4 million older adults in the United States use publicly funded home-and community-based services (HCBS) which were disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is paucity of empirical evidence of how service disruptions influenced consumer needs in different types of HCBS. Therefore, we evaluate changes in service use and consumer-reported unmet service needs in HCBS during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021-2022) versus pre-pandemic (2018-2019), to inform future public health emergency (PHE) preparedness.

Methods: We analyzed repeated cross-sectional survey data from the National Core Indicators- Aging and Disability Adult Consumer Survey in two survey waves, 2018-2019 and 2021-2022. We included community-dwelling, older HCBS consumers (age ≥ 65 years; n = 7143) from 11 states that participated in both survey waves. We measured service use and consumer-reported unmet needs as outcomes for six commonly used HCBS including personal care, homemaker, meal delivery, adult day, transportation, and caregiver respite/support. Using logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to evaluate changes in outcomes during versus pre-pandemic, adjusting for demographics, health-related variables, and self- versus proxy-response, with random intercepts for each state.

Results: Compared to 2018-2019, during 2021-2022, odds of service use increased for personal care (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.09, 1.40) and caregiver respite/support (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00, 1.63) but decreased for homemaker services (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60, 0.79) and meal delivery (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70, 0.93). During the PHE, odds of unmet service needs increased for personal care (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03, 1.46) and meal delivery (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.56), and decreased for caregiver respite/support (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.70).

Conclusions: During the PHE, simultaneous increase in services use and unmet service needs for some HCBS (e.g. personal care) suggests that temporary PHE measures taken were insufficient to offset the demand for those services. For caregiver respite/support, increased service use and decreased unmet service needs suggests that the temporary PHE measures for caregiver support may have offset a rise in service demand. These findings can inform evaluations of temporary PHE policies for HCBS and disaster preparedness efforts for future PHEs.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信