老年社区获得性肺炎患者应激性高血糖与谵妄的直接和间接关联:中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率和降钙素原的有限调解

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jingxian Liao, Xiaozhu Shen, Zhiqiang Du, Lei Miao
{"title":"老年社区获得性肺炎患者应激性高血糖与谵妄的直接和间接关联:中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率和降钙素原的有限调解","authors":"Jingxian Liao, Xiaozhu Shen, Zhiqiang Du, Lei Miao","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-06410-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress hyperglycaemia is common among older adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and is associated with delirium; however, the underlying inflammatory pathways remain unclear. We investigated whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and procalcitonin (PCT) mediate the relation between the stress-hyperglycaemia ratio (SHR) and delirium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre retrospective cohort included 412 patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted for CAP. Delirium was assessed daily with the Confusion Assessment Method. Logistic regression models yielded odds ratios (ORs) for delirium, whereas linear regression models for NLR and PCT provided standardised beta coefficients (β_std). All continuous variables (SHR, NLR and PCT) were z-scored prior to mediation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Delirium developed in 99 patients (24.0%). After adjustment for age, sex and comorbidities, SHR (OR = 9.13, 95% CI 4.44-18.96), NLR (OR = 1.12 per unit, 95% CI 1.06-1.19) and PCT (OR = 1.14 per ng/mL, 95% CI 1.06-1.21) were independent predictors of delirium. The total standardised effect of SHR on delirium was β_std = 0.321, of which 80.6% was direct (β_std = 0.259, 95% CI 0.149-0.427). The NLR-mediated pathway accounted for 19.4% of the association (β_std = 0.062, 95% CI 0.024-0.107). Pathways involving PCT-alone or in sequence with NLR-were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older CAP patients, stress hyperglycaemia substantially elevates delirium risk, predominantly through a direct mechanism only partly (≈ 20%) mediated by systemic inflammation reflected by NLR. Prompt detection and management of acute hyperglycaemia may therefore offer a practical approach to delirium prevention. Prospective multicentre studies are needed to confirm causality and to test glucose- and inflammation-modulating interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"735"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct and indirect associations of stress hyperglycemia with delirium in older adults with community-acquired pneumonia: limited mediation by neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and procalcitonin.\",\"authors\":\"Jingxian Liao, Xiaozhu Shen, Zhiqiang Du, Lei Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-025-06410-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress hyperglycaemia is common among older adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and is associated with delirium; however, the underlying inflammatory pathways remain unclear. We investigated whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and procalcitonin (PCT) mediate the relation between the stress-hyperglycaemia ratio (SHR) and delirium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre retrospective cohort included 412 patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted for CAP. Delirium was assessed daily with the Confusion Assessment Method. Logistic regression models yielded odds ratios (ORs) for delirium, whereas linear regression models for NLR and PCT provided standardised beta coefficients (β_std). All continuous variables (SHR, NLR and PCT) were z-scored prior to mediation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Delirium developed in 99 patients (24.0%). After adjustment for age, sex and comorbidities, SHR (OR = 9.13, 95% CI 4.44-18.96), NLR (OR = 1.12 per unit, 95% CI 1.06-1.19) and PCT (OR = 1.14 per ng/mL, 95% CI 1.06-1.21) were independent predictors of delirium. The total standardised effect of SHR on delirium was β_std = 0.321, of which 80.6% was direct (β_std = 0.259, 95% CI 0.149-0.427). The NLR-mediated pathway accounted for 19.4% of the association (β_std = 0.062, 95% CI 0.024-0.107). Pathways involving PCT-alone or in sequence with NLR-were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older CAP patients, stress hyperglycaemia substantially elevates delirium risk, predominantly through a direct mechanism only partly (≈ 20%) mediated by systemic inflammation reflected by NLR. Prompt detection and management of acute hyperglycaemia may therefore offer a practical approach to delirium prevention. Prospective multicentre studies are needed to confirm causality and to test glucose- and inflammation-modulating interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"735\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482508/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06410-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06410-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:应激性高血糖在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院的老年人中很常见,并与谵妄相关;然而,潜在的炎症途径仍不清楚。我们研究了中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和降钙素原(PCT)是否介导应激-高血糖比值(SHR)与谵妄之间的关系。方法:该单中心回顾性队列包括412例年龄≥65岁的CAP患者。谵妄每日用混淆评估法进行评估。逻辑回归模型得出谵妄的比值比(ORs),而NLR和PCT的线性回归模型提供了标准化的β系数(β_std)。所有连续变量(SHR、NLR和PCT)在中介分析前进行z评分。结果:99例(24.0%)出现谵妄。调整年龄、性别和合并症后,SHR (OR = 9.13, 95% CI 4.44-18.96)、NLR (OR = 1.12 /单位,95% CI 1.06-1.19)和PCT (OR = 1.14 / ng/mL, 95% CI 1.06-1.21)是谵妄的独立预测因子。SHR对谵妄的总标准化效应β_std = 0.321,其中直接效应为80.6% (β_std = 0.259, 95% CI 0.149 ~ 0.427)。nlr介导的途径占19.4% (β_std = 0.062, 95% CI 0.024-0.107)。单独涉及pct或与nlr序列的通路无显著性。结论:在老年CAP患者中,应激性高血糖显著提高谵妄风险,主要是通过直接机制,仅部分(≈20%)由NLR反映的全身性炎症介导。因此,及时发现和处理急性高血糖可能为预防谵妄提供了一种实用的方法。需要前瞻性多中心研究来确认因果关系,并测试葡萄糖和炎症调节干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Direct and indirect associations of stress hyperglycemia with delirium in older adults with community-acquired pneumonia: limited mediation by neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and procalcitonin.

Direct and indirect associations of stress hyperglycemia with delirium in older adults with community-acquired pneumonia: limited mediation by neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and procalcitonin.

Direct and indirect associations of stress hyperglycemia with delirium in older adults with community-acquired pneumonia: limited mediation by neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and procalcitonin.

Direct and indirect associations of stress hyperglycemia with delirium in older adults with community-acquired pneumonia: limited mediation by neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and procalcitonin.

Background: Stress hyperglycaemia is common among older adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and is associated with delirium; however, the underlying inflammatory pathways remain unclear. We investigated whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and procalcitonin (PCT) mediate the relation between the stress-hyperglycaemia ratio (SHR) and delirium.

Methods: This single-centre retrospective cohort included 412 patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted for CAP. Delirium was assessed daily with the Confusion Assessment Method. Logistic regression models yielded odds ratios (ORs) for delirium, whereas linear regression models for NLR and PCT provided standardised beta coefficients (β_std). All continuous variables (SHR, NLR and PCT) were z-scored prior to mediation analysis.

Results: Delirium developed in 99 patients (24.0%). After adjustment for age, sex and comorbidities, SHR (OR = 9.13, 95% CI 4.44-18.96), NLR (OR = 1.12 per unit, 95% CI 1.06-1.19) and PCT (OR = 1.14 per ng/mL, 95% CI 1.06-1.21) were independent predictors of delirium. The total standardised effect of SHR on delirium was β_std = 0.321, of which 80.6% was direct (β_std = 0.259, 95% CI 0.149-0.427). The NLR-mediated pathway accounted for 19.4% of the association (β_std = 0.062, 95% CI 0.024-0.107). Pathways involving PCT-alone or in sequence with NLR-were not significant.

Conclusions: In older CAP patients, stress hyperglycaemia substantially elevates delirium risk, predominantly through a direct mechanism only partly (≈ 20%) mediated by systemic inflammation reflected by NLR. Prompt detection and management of acute hyperglycaemia may therefore offer a practical approach to delirium prevention. Prospective multicentre studies are needed to confirm causality and to test glucose- and inflammation-modulating interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信