Karin Persson, Hanneke F. M. Rhodius-Meester, Trine Holt Edwin, Anne-Brita Knapskog, Peter Bekkhus-Wetterberg, Geir Selbæk, Knut Engedal, Till Schellhorn
{"title":"自动MRI体积测量辅助视觉评估临床痴呆检查中的内侧颞叶。","authors":"Karin Persson, Hanneke F. M. Rhodius-Meester, Trine Holt Edwin, Anne-Brita Knapskog, Peter Bekkhus-Wetterberg, Geir Selbæk, Knut Engedal, Till Schellhorn","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction:</h3>\n \n <p>Efficient and cost-effective diagnostic tools for supporting dementia assessment are increasingly important. We aimed to evaluate whether providing neuroradiologists with volumetric data from an automatic MRI software, NeuroQuant, enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of their visual MRI assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods:</h3>\n \n <p>Two neuroradiologists assessed brain MRIs from 366 patients (mean age 67.5 years, SD 9.2, and 52% females) with subjective cognitive decline (SCD, <i>n</i> 79), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, <i>n</i> 86), or dementia (<i>n</i> 201). The MCI and dementia patients were further diagnosed according to an etiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD, <i>n</i> 217) versus non-AD (<i>n</i> 70). In random order the neuroradiologists visually evaluated medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA, scale 0–4) with and without having access to the NeuroQuant report of age and sex adjusted volumetric percentiles of the hippocampus. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) analyses were conducted to calculate the area under the curves (AUCs) for the visual MTA, the automated NeuroQuant percentile, and the combined NeuroQuant-assisted MTA in discriminating dementia from SCD and AD from non-AD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results:</h3>\n \n <p>The AUC of the visual MTA for dementia versus SCD discrimination increased slightly but not significantly when the neuroradiologists were provided with NeuroQuant results (AUC 0.76–0.79, <i>p</i> 0.28). Yet, the isolated NeuroQuant evaluation reached the highest accuracy (AUC 0.85, <i>p</i> < 0.001), significantly better than the MTA assessment (<i>p</i> 0.002) and the NeuroQuant-assisted MTA (<i>p</i> 0.04). Only the isolated NeuroQuant assessment discriminated AD from non-AD (AUC 0.60, <i>p</i> 0.006).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion:</h3>\n \n <p>On the basis of our findings, we suggest an increased use of clinically approved automatic volumetry methods in radiological departments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic MRI Volumetry Assisted Visual Assessment of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Clinical Dementia Work-Up\",\"authors\":\"Karin Persson, Hanneke F. M. Rhodius-Meester, Trine Holt Edwin, Anne-Brita Knapskog, Peter Bekkhus-Wetterberg, Geir Selbæk, Knut Engedal, Till Schellhorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brb3.70948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction:</h3>\\n \\n <p>Efficient and cost-effective diagnostic tools for supporting dementia assessment are increasingly important. We aimed to evaluate whether providing neuroradiologists with volumetric data from an automatic MRI software, NeuroQuant, enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of their visual MRI assessment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods:</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two neuroradiologists assessed brain MRIs from 366 patients (mean age 67.5 years, SD 9.2, and 52% females) with subjective cognitive decline (SCD, <i>n</i> 79), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, <i>n</i> 86), or dementia (<i>n</i> 201). The MCI and dementia patients were further diagnosed according to an etiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD, <i>n</i> 217) versus non-AD (<i>n</i> 70). In random order the neuroradiologists visually evaluated medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA, scale 0–4) with and without having access to the NeuroQuant report of age and sex adjusted volumetric percentiles of the hippocampus. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) analyses were conducted to calculate the area under the curves (AUCs) for the visual MTA, the automated NeuroQuant percentile, and the combined NeuroQuant-assisted MTA in discriminating dementia from SCD and AD from non-AD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results:</h3>\\n \\n <p>The AUC of the visual MTA for dementia versus SCD discrimination increased slightly but not significantly when the neuroradiologists were provided with NeuroQuant results (AUC 0.76–0.79, <i>p</i> 0.28). Yet, the isolated NeuroQuant evaluation reached the highest accuracy (AUC 0.85, <i>p</i> < 0.001), significantly better than the MTA assessment (<i>p</i> 0.002) and the NeuroQuant-assisted MTA (<i>p</i> 0.04). Only the isolated NeuroQuant assessment discriminated AD from non-AD (AUC 0.60, <i>p</i> 0.006).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion:</h3>\\n \\n <p>On the basis of our findings, we suggest an increased use of clinically approved automatic volumetry methods in radiological departments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480925/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70948\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
高效、经济的诊断工具对痴呆症的评估越来越重要。我们的目的是评估为神经放射科医生提供自动MRI软件NeuroQuant的体积数据是否提高了他们视觉MRI评估的诊断准确性。方法:两名神经放射科医生评估了366例主观认知能力下降(SCD, 79例)、轻度认知障碍(MCI, 86例)或痴呆(201例)患者的脑mri(平均年龄67.5岁,SD 9.2,女性52%)。根据阿尔茨海默病(AD, n 217)与非阿尔茨海默病(n 70)的病因进一步诊断MCI和痴呆患者。神经放射学家以随机顺序目视评估内侧颞叶萎缩(MTA, 0-4级),有和没有获得NeuroQuant报告的年龄和性别调整的海马体体积百分比。进行受试者工作特征(roc)分析,以计算视觉MTA、自动NeuroQuant百分比和联合NeuroQuant辅助MTA在区分痴呆与SCD、AD与非AD方面的曲线下面积(auc)。结果:当神经放射科医生获得NeuroQuant结果时,视觉MTA对痴呆和SCD的识别AUC略有增加,但不显著(AUC 0.76-0.79, p 0.28)。然而,单独的NeuroQuant评估达到了最高的准确性(AUC 0.85, p)。结论:基于我们的研究结果,我们建议在放射科增加临床批准的自动体积测定方法的使用。
Automatic MRI Volumetry Assisted Visual Assessment of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Clinical Dementia Work-Up
Introduction:
Efficient and cost-effective diagnostic tools for supporting dementia assessment are increasingly important. We aimed to evaluate whether providing neuroradiologists with volumetric data from an automatic MRI software, NeuroQuant, enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of their visual MRI assessment.
Methods:
Two neuroradiologists assessed brain MRIs from 366 patients (mean age 67.5 years, SD 9.2, and 52% females) with subjective cognitive decline (SCD, n 79), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n 86), or dementia (n 201). The MCI and dementia patients were further diagnosed according to an etiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD, n 217) versus non-AD (n 70). In random order the neuroradiologists visually evaluated medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA, scale 0–4) with and without having access to the NeuroQuant report of age and sex adjusted volumetric percentiles of the hippocampus. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) analyses were conducted to calculate the area under the curves (AUCs) for the visual MTA, the automated NeuroQuant percentile, and the combined NeuroQuant-assisted MTA in discriminating dementia from SCD and AD from non-AD.
Results:
The AUC of the visual MTA for dementia versus SCD discrimination increased slightly but not significantly when the neuroradiologists were provided with NeuroQuant results (AUC 0.76–0.79, p 0.28). Yet, the isolated NeuroQuant evaluation reached the highest accuracy (AUC 0.85, p < 0.001), significantly better than the MTA assessment (p 0.002) and the NeuroQuant-assisted MTA (p 0.04). Only the isolated NeuroQuant assessment discriminated AD from non-AD (AUC 0.60, p 0.006).
Conclusion:
On the basis of our findings, we suggest an increased use of clinically approved automatic volumetry methods in radiological departments.
期刊介绍:
Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior.
* [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica)
* [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology)
* [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior)
* [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology)
* [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development)
* [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health)
* [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety)
* Developmental Neurobiology
* [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science)
* [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience)
* [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior)
* [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia)
* [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus)
* [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping)
* [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour)
* [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology)
* [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging)
* [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research)
* [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior)
* [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system)
* [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve)
* [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)