抗病毒治疗对家庭传播SARS-CoV-2的比较效果:一项使用行政数据的回顾性队列研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Kazuhiko Ikeuchi, Makoto Saito, Kazuya Okushin, Yuki Arisato, Toshiyuki Kishida, Shinya Matsumoto, Akira Kado, Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi, Takeya Tsutsumi
{"title":"抗病毒治疗对家庭传播SARS-CoV-2的比较效果:一项使用行政数据的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Kazuhiko Ikeuchi, Makoto Saito, Kazuya Okushin, Yuki Arisato, Toshiyuki Kishida, Shinya Matsumoto, Akira Kado, Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi, Takeya Tsutsumi","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-11651-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antiviral treatment reduces influenza transmission and differs in effectiveness among agents. Although SARS-CoV-2 antivirals lower viral shedding, their role in preventing secondary household transmission and the differences between agents remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the JMDC administrative claims database in Japan. The study included married-couple households between 1 April and 31 August 2023, when the Omicron XBB variant was predominant. Households in which at least one person had been diagnosed with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) were included. We excluded households if the index patient did not receive antiviral treatment on day 0, or the spouse was diagnosed on day 0 or 1. The primary outcome was subsequent infection in the spouse by day 7. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), after adjusting for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 326,827 married-couple households, 5,398 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 1,143 households (21.2%) experienced presumed secondary transmission by day 7. The cumulative transmission rate, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, was lower among hospitalized patients (n = 73, 11.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7-20.8%) than among outpatients (n = 5,325, 21.5%, 95% CI: 20.4-22.6%, p = 0.035). Transmission rates did not significantly differ among the outpatient antiviral groups: molnupiravir (n = 3,093, 21.3%, 95% CI: 19.9-22.8%), ensitrelvir (n = 1,907, 21.6%, 95% CI: 19.8-23.6%), and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n = 323, 22.8%, 95% CI: 18.6-27.8%, p = 0.74). In multivariable Cox analysis, male sex (adjusted HR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26-1.63; p < 0.001), history of COVID-19 in the index patient (adjusted HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.76; p = 0.001), and history of COVID-19 in the partner (adjusted HR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.21-0.45; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with transmission risk. Hospitalization tended to be associated with a lower risk of transmission (adjusted HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.25-1.03; p = 0.062).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Household transmission rates were not statistically different among three different outpatient oral antiviral agents. Hospitalization was associated with a trend toward lower transmission rates, possibly due to physical isolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"1213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of antiviral treatment on household transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a retrospective cohort study using administrative data.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuhiko Ikeuchi, Makoto Saito, Kazuya Okushin, Yuki Arisato, Toshiyuki Kishida, Shinya Matsumoto, Akira Kado, Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi, Takeya Tsutsumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12879-025-11651-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antiviral treatment reduces influenza transmission and differs in effectiveness among agents. Although SARS-CoV-2 antivirals lower viral shedding, their role in preventing secondary household transmission and the differences between agents remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the JMDC administrative claims database in Japan. The study included married-couple households between 1 April and 31 August 2023, when the Omicron XBB variant was predominant. Households in which at least one person had been diagnosed with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) were included. We excluded households if the index patient did not receive antiviral treatment on day 0, or the spouse was diagnosed on day 0 or 1. The primary outcome was subsequent infection in the spouse by day 7. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), after adjusting for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 326,827 married-couple households, 5,398 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 1,143 households (21.2%) experienced presumed secondary transmission by day 7. The cumulative transmission rate, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, was lower among hospitalized patients (n = 73, 11.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7-20.8%) than among outpatients (n = 5,325, 21.5%, 95% CI: 20.4-22.6%, p = 0.035). Transmission rates did not significantly differ among the outpatient antiviral groups: molnupiravir (n = 3,093, 21.3%, 95% CI: 19.9-22.8%), ensitrelvir (n = 1,907, 21.6%, 95% CI: 19.8-23.6%), and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n = 323, 22.8%, 95% CI: 18.6-27.8%, p = 0.74). In multivariable Cox analysis, male sex (adjusted HR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26-1.63; p < 0.001), history of COVID-19 in the index patient (adjusted HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.76; p = 0.001), and history of COVID-19 in the partner (adjusted HR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.21-0.45; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with transmission risk. Hospitalization tended to be associated with a lower risk of transmission (adjusted HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.25-1.03; p = 0.062).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Household transmission rates were not statistically different among three different outpatient oral antiviral agents. Hospitalization was associated with a trend toward lower transmission rates, possibly due to physical isolation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11651-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11651-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗病毒治疗减少流感传播,不同药物的效果不同。尽管SARS-CoV-2抗病毒药物降低了病毒的脱落,但它们在防止继发性家庭传播中的作用以及药物之间的差异仍不清楚。方法:我们使用日本JMDC行政索赔数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。该研究包括2023年4月1日至8月31日期间的已婚夫妇家庭,当时Omicron XBB变体占主导地位。其中包括至少有一人被诊断患有2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的家庭。如果指标患者在第0天没有接受抗病毒治疗,或者配偶在第0天或第1天被诊断出来,我们将家庭排除在外。主要结果是配偶在第7天的后续感染。在调整潜在混杂因素后,使用Cox比例风险模型来估计风险比(hr)。结果:在326,827个已婚家庭中,有5,398个符合纳入标准。其中,1143户(21.2%)在第7天推定发生了二次传播。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计,住院患者的累积传播率(n = 73, 11.0%, 95%可信区间[CI]: 5.7-20.8%)低于门诊患者(n = 5,325, 21.5%, 95% CI: 20.4-22.6%, p = 0.035)。门诊部抗病毒药物组之间的传播率无显著差异:莫努匹拉韦(n = 3093, 21.3%, 95% CI: 19.9-22.8%)、恩西瑞韦(n = 1,907, 21.6%, 95% CI: 19.8-23.6%)和尼马特瑞韦/利托那韦(n = 323, 22.8%, 95% CI: 18.6-27.8%, p = 0.74)。在多变量Cox分析中,男性(校正HR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26-1.63; p)结论:三种不同门诊口服抗病毒药物的家庭传播率无统计学差异。住院与低传播率的趋势有关,可能是由于物理隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative effectiveness of antiviral treatment on household transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a retrospective cohort study using administrative data.

Background: Antiviral treatment reduces influenza transmission and differs in effectiveness among agents. Although SARS-CoV-2 antivirals lower viral shedding, their role in preventing secondary household transmission and the differences between agents remain unclear.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the JMDC administrative claims database in Japan. The study included married-couple households between 1 April and 31 August 2023, when the Omicron XBB variant was predominant. Households in which at least one person had been diagnosed with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) were included. We excluded households if the index patient did not receive antiviral treatment on day 0, or the spouse was diagnosed on day 0 or 1. The primary outcome was subsequent infection in the spouse by day 7. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), after adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: Of the 326,827 married-couple households, 5,398 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 1,143 households (21.2%) experienced presumed secondary transmission by day 7. The cumulative transmission rate, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, was lower among hospitalized patients (n = 73, 11.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7-20.8%) than among outpatients (n = 5,325, 21.5%, 95% CI: 20.4-22.6%, p = 0.035). Transmission rates did not significantly differ among the outpatient antiviral groups: molnupiravir (n = 3,093, 21.3%, 95% CI: 19.9-22.8%), ensitrelvir (n = 1,907, 21.6%, 95% CI: 19.8-23.6%), and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n = 323, 22.8%, 95% CI: 18.6-27.8%, p = 0.74). In multivariable Cox analysis, male sex (adjusted HR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26-1.63; p < 0.001), history of COVID-19 in the index patient (adjusted HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.76; p = 0.001), and history of COVID-19 in the partner (adjusted HR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.21-0.45; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with transmission risk. Hospitalization tended to be associated with a lower risk of transmission (adjusted HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.25-1.03; p = 0.062).

Conclusions: Household transmission rates were not statistically different among three different outpatient oral antiviral agents. Hospitalization was associated with a trend toward lower transmission rates, possibly due to physical isolation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信