{"title":"圆形光滑生理盐水乳房植入20年的经验:原因、趋势和处理。","authors":"Ted S Eisenberg, Julianne Pilla, George Chapa","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-05242-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent literature has identified a rising trend in breast implant explantation, frequently attributed to concerns about implant safety and long-term health risks. The purpose of this study is to analyze patient-reported reasons for explantation and to share the senior author's experience with implant removal and postoperative management over a 20 year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of 4909 patients who underwent primary cosmetic breast augmentation between 2005 and 2024. Of these, 77 patients elected to undergo explantation. All explanted patients had round, smooth Mentor saline implants. Only four patients had their original augmentation performed by another surgeon. Post-explantation management included placement of two 6-inch compression bandages for one to three weeks, followed by aesthetic reassessment at an average of two months. Patient demographics-including age, height, weight, pregnancy history, implant size, tobacco use, and pertinent medical history-were recorded. Time from implantation to explantation and patient-reported reasons were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 patients underwent bilateral explantation, representing 1.57% of the 4909 augmentations performed by the senior author. The average duration from implantation to explantation was 12 years, and the average patient age at explantation was 43 years. The average implant volume was 413 cc. Between 2016 and 2024, there was a 382.9% increase in explantation procedures, consistent with global trends. The most common reason for explantation was weight gain and the perception of breasts being too large (n = 27, 35.06%), followed by implant deflation (n = 24, 31.17%). One patient underwent implant replacement with a smaller volume at 9 months, another opted for larger implants 5 years later, and one patient underwent mastopexy 3 months after explantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the trend in breast implant explantation continues to rise, the findings in this study contrast with current literature citing implant safety concerns as the primary motivator. In this cohort, the most common reasons for removal were significant weight gain resulting in dissatisfaction with breast size, implant deflation, and a history of multiple prior cosmetic breast surgeries. Postoperative management with simple explantation and compression bandaging yielded satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 20-Year Experience with Round Smooth Saline Breast Implant Explantation: Reasons, Trends, and Management.\",\"authors\":\"Ted S Eisenberg, Julianne Pilla, George Chapa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-025-05242-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent literature has identified a rising trend in breast implant explantation, frequently attributed to concerns about implant safety and long-term health risks. The purpose of this study is to analyze patient-reported reasons for explantation and to share the senior author's experience with implant removal and postoperative management over a 20 year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of 4909 patients who underwent primary cosmetic breast augmentation between 2005 and 2024. Of these, 77 patients elected to undergo explantation. All explanted patients had round, smooth Mentor saline implants. Only four patients had their original augmentation performed by another surgeon. Post-explantation management included placement of two 6-inch compression bandages for one to three weeks, followed by aesthetic reassessment at an average of two months. Patient demographics-including age, height, weight, pregnancy history, implant size, tobacco use, and pertinent medical history-were recorded. Time from implantation to explantation and patient-reported reasons were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 patients underwent bilateral explantation, representing 1.57% of the 4909 augmentations performed by the senior author. The average duration from implantation to explantation was 12 years, and the average patient age at explantation was 43 years. The average implant volume was 413 cc. Between 2016 and 2024, there was a 382.9% increase in explantation procedures, consistent with global trends. The most common reason for explantation was weight gain and the perception of breasts being too large (n = 27, 35.06%), followed by implant deflation (n = 24, 31.17%). One patient underwent implant replacement with a smaller volume at 9 months, another opted for larger implants 5 years later, and one patient underwent mastopexy 3 months after explantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the trend in breast implant explantation continues to rise, the findings in this study contrast with current literature citing implant safety concerns as the primary motivator. In this cohort, the most common reasons for removal were significant weight gain resulting in dissatisfaction with breast size, implant deflation, and a history of multiple prior cosmetic breast surgeries. Postoperative management with simple explantation and compression bandaging yielded satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05242-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05242-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A 20-Year Experience with Round Smooth Saline Breast Implant Explantation: Reasons, Trends, and Management.
Background: Recent literature has identified a rising trend in breast implant explantation, frequently attributed to concerns about implant safety and long-term health risks. The purpose of this study is to analyze patient-reported reasons for explantation and to share the senior author's experience with implant removal and postoperative management over a 20 year period.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 4909 patients who underwent primary cosmetic breast augmentation between 2005 and 2024. Of these, 77 patients elected to undergo explantation. All explanted patients had round, smooth Mentor saline implants. Only four patients had their original augmentation performed by another surgeon. Post-explantation management included placement of two 6-inch compression bandages for one to three weeks, followed by aesthetic reassessment at an average of two months. Patient demographics-including age, height, weight, pregnancy history, implant size, tobacco use, and pertinent medical history-were recorded. Time from implantation to explantation and patient-reported reasons were also documented.
Results: A total of 77 patients underwent bilateral explantation, representing 1.57% of the 4909 augmentations performed by the senior author. The average duration from implantation to explantation was 12 years, and the average patient age at explantation was 43 years. The average implant volume was 413 cc. Between 2016 and 2024, there was a 382.9% increase in explantation procedures, consistent with global trends. The most common reason for explantation was weight gain and the perception of breasts being too large (n = 27, 35.06%), followed by implant deflation (n = 24, 31.17%). One patient underwent implant replacement with a smaller volume at 9 months, another opted for larger implants 5 years later, and one patient underwent mastopexy 3 months after explantation.
Conclusion: While the trend in breast implant explantation continues to rise, the findings in this study contrast with current literature citing implant safety concerns as the primary motivator. In this cohort, the most common reasons for removal were significant weight gain resulting in dissatisfaction with breast size, implant deflation, and a history of multiple prior cosmetic breast surgeries. Postoperative management with simple explantation and compression bandaging yielded satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.
Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.