蝶腭神经节神经阻滞对鼻中隔成形术期间和之后出血和疼痛的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Do Hyun Kim, David W Jang, Se Hwan Hwang
{"title":"蝶腭神经节神经阻滞对鼻中隔成形术期间和之后出血和疼痛的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Do Hyun Kim, David W Jang, Se Hwan Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-05279-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Administration of a sphenopalatine ganglion block using a local anesthetic has been proposed as a method to reduce bleeding and pain associated with septorhinoplasty, but definitive evidence to support this practice is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis. In all of them, the outcomes of patients receiving perioperative SPGB (treatment group) were compared with those of patients receiving either a placebo or no intervention (control group). The primary outcomes in the present study were pain and bleeding, with quantitative data synthesized using standardized mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the SPGB group had significantly less intraoperative pain, as evidenced by less remifentanil consumption, and required fewer postoperative analgesics than the control group. Postoperative pain scores were consistently lower in the SPGB group for up to 24 h. Mean arterial pressure during surgery was also better controlled in the treatment group. The quality of the surgical field was improved, as indicated by reduced bleeding and higher surgeon satisfaction. However, no differences emerged between groups in terms of operative time or lower or upper eyelid ecchymosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this meta-analysis support the use of SPGB with local anesthesia in septorhinoplasty to significantly reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications, particularly in terms of managing pain and bleeding.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Nerve Block on Bleeding and Pain During and After Septorhinoplasty: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Do Hyun Kim, David W Jang, Se Hwan Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-025-05279-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Administration of a sphenopalatine ganglion block using a local anesthetic has been proposed as a method to reduce bleeding and pain associated with septorhinoplasty, but definitive evidence to support this practice is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis. In all of them, the outcomes of patients receiving perioperative SPGB (treatment group) were compared with those of patients receiving either a placebo or no intervention (control group). The primary outcomes in the present study were pain and bleeding, with quantitative data synthesized using standardized mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the SPGB group had significantly less intraoperative pain, as evidenced by less remifentanil consumption, and required fewer postoperative analgesics than the control group. Postoperative pain scores were consistently lower in the SPGB group for up to 24 h. Mean arterial pressure during surgery was also better controlled in the treatment group. The quality of the surgical field was improved, as indicated by reduced bleeding and higher surgeon satisfaction. However, no differences emerged between groups in terms of operative time or lower or upper eyelid ecchymosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this meta-analysis support the use of SPGB with local anesthesia in septorhinoplasty to significantly reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications, particularly in terms of managing pain and bleeding.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05279-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05279-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用局部麻醉剂进行蝶腭神经节阻滞已被提议作为减少鼻中隔成形术相关出血和疼痛的方法,但缺乏明确的证据支持这种做法。方法:通过系统检索PubMed、SCOPUS、谷歌Scholar、Embase和Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials,筛选相关研究。荟萃分析纳入了五项研究。在所有这些患者中,接受围手术期SPGB的患者(治疗组)与接受安慰剂或不干预的患者(对照组)的结果进行比较。本研究的主要结局是疼痛和出血,定量数据采用标准化平均差异合成。结果:SPGB组患者术中疼痛明显减轻,瑞芬太尼用量减少,术后需要的镇痛药也少于对照组。SPGB组术后疼痛评分持续较低,持续时间长达24小时。治疗组手术期间平均动脉压也得到了较好的控制。手术野的质量得到改善,出血减少,外科医生满意度提高。然而,两组之间在手术时间或上下眼睑淤斑方面没有差异。结论:本荟萃分析的结果支持在鼻中隔成形术中使用SPGB局部麻醉可显著减少术中和术后并发症,特别是在疼痛和出血方面。证据等级iii:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Nerve Block on Bleeding and Pain During and After Septorhinoplasty: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Administration of a sphenopalatine ganglion block using a local anesthetic has been proposed as a method to reduce bleeding and pain associated with septorhinoplasty, but definitive evidence to support this practice is lacking.

Methods: Relevant studies were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis. In all of them, the outcomes of patients receiving perioperative SPGB (treatment group) were compared with those of patients receiving either a placebo or no intervention (control group). The primary outcomes in the present study were pain and bleeding, with quantitative data synthesized using standardized mean differences.

Results: Patients in the SPGB group had significantly less intraoperative pain, as evidenced by less remifentanil consumption, and required fewer postoperative analgesics than the control group. Postoperative pain scores were consistently lower in the SPGB group for up to 24 h. Mean arterial pressure during surgery was also better controlled in the treatment group. The quality of the surgical field was improved, as indicated by reduced bleeding and higher surgeon satisfaction. However, no differences emerged between groups in terms of operative time or lower or upper eyelid ecchymosis.

Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis support the use of SPGB with local anesthesia in septorhinoplasty to significantly reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications, particularly in terms of managing pain and bleeding.

Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信