心脏手术中金黄色葡萄球菌去菌落的实施

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Dominique de Waard MD, MSc , Ryan Gainer MSc , Meaghan Sim PhD, RD , Claudia Cote MD, MSc , Paul Bonnar MD , Gregory M. Hirsch MD
{"title":"心脏手术中金黄色葡萄球菌去菌落的实施","authors":"Dominique de Waard MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Ryan Gainer MSc ,&nbsp;Meaghan Sim PhD, RD ,&nbsp;Claudia Cote MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Paul Bonnar MD ,&nbsp;Gregory M. Hirsch MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjtc.2025.06.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (SA) screening and decolonization is a guideline-recommended treatment for the prevention of surgical site infections in cardiac surgery. This study aimed to formally assess the barriers and facilitators associated with its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Targeted SA screening and decolonization started at our institution in November 2022. To assess barriers and facilitators to implementation, we conducted focus group interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research at approximately 6 months after initiation of the intervention. We also regularly collected quantitative data on missed screening and/or decolonization to address gaps in uptake. This was reviewed at 6-month and 1-year time points. Adjustments to implementation were regularly made to address barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 1 year, 563 nonurgent inpatients and 232 outpatients were consulted to cardiac surgery. Ninety-five percent of the inpatients and 91% of the outpatients considered for cardiac surgery were screened appropriately. Of the patients accepted for cardiac surgery, 50% of positive inpatients underwent decolonization in the first 6 months prior to focus groups compared to 67% in the subsequent 6 months. For outpatients, 77% were decolonized in the first 6 months, compared to 79% in the subsequent 6 months. Major barriers to implementation included delays in receiving screening results, difficulty meeting screening and decolonization timelines, and staffing turnover.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SA screening and decolonization was successfully implemented as a standard of care at our institution with the aid of an implementation science framework. By engaging care partners and healthcare staff throughout the implementation process and regularly addressing barriers, we developed a sustainable SA screening and decolonization program. Adjustments are ongoing to increase and sustain decolonization uptake.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53413,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS Techniques","volume":"33 ","pages":"Pages 160-173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of Staphylococcus aureus decolonization in cardiac surgery\",\"authors\":\"Dominique de Waard MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Ryan Gainer MSc ,&nbsp;Meaghan Sim PhD, RD ,&nbsp;Claudia Cote MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Paul Bonnar MD ,&nbsp;Gregory M. Hirsch MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjtc.2025.06.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (SA) screening and decolonization is a guideline-recommended treatment for the prevention of surgical site infections in cardiac surgery. This study aimed to formally assess the barriers and facilitators associated with its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Targeted SA screening and decolonization started at our institution in November 2022. To assess barriers and facilitators to implementation, we conducted focus group interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research at approximately 6 months after initiation of the intervention. We also regularly collected quantitative data on missed screening and/or decolonization to address gaps in uptake. This was reviewed at 6-month and 1-year time points. Adjustments to implementation were regularly made to address barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 1 year, 563 nonurgent inpatients and 232 outpatients were consulted to cardiac surgery. Ninety-five percent of the inpatients and 91% of the outpatients considered for cardiac surgery were screened appropriately. Of the patients accepted for cardiac surgery, 50% of positive inpatients underwent decolonization in the first 6 months prior to focus groups compared to 67% in the subsequent 6 months. For outpatients, 77% were decolonized in the first 6 months, compared to 79% in the subsequent 6 months. Major barriers to implementation included delays in receiving screening results, difficulty meeting screening and decolonization timelines, and staffing turnover.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SA screening and decolonization was successfully implemented as a standard of care at our institution with the aid of an implementation science framework. By engaging care partners and healthcare staff throughout the implementation process and regularly addressing barriers, we developed a sustainable SA screening and decolonization program. Adjustments are ongoing to increase and sustain decolonization uptake.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTCVS Techniques\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 160-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTCVS Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250725002755\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250725002755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在心脏外科手术中,金黄色葡萄球菌(SA)筛查和去菌落是预防手术部位感染的一种指南推荐治疗方法。本研究旨在正式评估与实施相关的障碍和促进因素。方法于2022年11月在我院开展有针对性的SA筛查和去殖民化。为了评估实施的障碍和促进因素,我们在干预措施开始后大约6个月,根据实施研究综合框架进行了焦点小组访谈。我们还定期收集关于错过筛查和/或非殖民化的定量数据,以解决吸收方面的差距。在6个月和1年的时间点进行回顾。定期调整执行情况以消除障碍。结果1年内共会诊非急诊住院患者563例,门诊患者232例。95%的住院患者和91%的门诊患者接受了适当的心脏手术筛查。在接受心脏手术的患者中,50%的阳性住院患者在焦点小组之前的前6个月进行了去殖民化,而在随后的6个月中这一比例为67%。对于门诊患者,77%的患者在前6个月去殖民化,而在随后的6个月里,这一比例为79%。执行工作的主要障碍包括延迟收到检查结果、难以满足检查和非殖民化时间表以及人员更替。结论在实施科学框架的帮助下,sa筛查和非殖民化作为一项标准护理在我院成功实施。通过让护理伙伴和医护人员参与整个实施过程,并定期解决障碍,我们制定了可持续的SA筛查和非殖民化计划。目前正在进行调整,以增加和维持非殖民化的吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of Staphylococcus aureus decolonization in cardiac surgery

Objective

Staphylococcus aureus (SA) screening and decolonization is a guideline-recommended treatment for the prevention of surgical site infections in cardiac surgery. This study aimed to formally assess the barriers and facilitators associated with its implementation.

Methods

Targeted SA screening and decolonization started at our institution in November 2022. To assess barriers and facilitators to implementation, we conducted focus group interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research at approximately 6 months after initiation of the intervention. We also regularly collected quantitative data on missed screening and/or decolonization to address gaps in uptake. This was reviewed at 6-month and 1-year time points. Adjustments to implementation were regularly made to address barriers.

Results

At 1 year, 563 nonurgent inpatients and 232 outpatients were consulted to cardiac surgery. Ninety-five percent of the inpatients and 91% of the outpatients considered for cardiac surgery were screened appropriately. Of the patients accepted for cardiac surgery, 50% of positive inpatients underwent decolonization in the first 6 months prior to focus groups compared to 67% in the subsequent 6 months. For outpatients, 77% were decolonized in the first 6 months, compared to 79% in the subsequent 6 months. Major barriers to implementation included delays in receiving screening results, difficulty meeting screening and decolonization timelines, and staffing turnover.

Conclusions

SA screening and decolonization was successfully implemented as a standard of care at our institution with the aid of an implementation science framework. By engaging care partners and healthcare staff throughout the implementation process and regularly addressing barriers, we developed a sustainable SA screening and decolonization program. Adjustments are ongoing to increase and sustain decolonization uptake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JTCVS Techniques
JTCVS Techniques Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
311
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信