Javier González de Dios , María Salomé Albi Rodríguez , Álvaro Gimeno Díaz de Atauri , Laura Cabrera Morente , Elena Pérez González , Carlos Ochoa Sangrador , Comité de Pediatría Basada en la Evidencia
{"title":"评论阅读(I):关于预报和有害影响的科学论文的基础、工具及其应用","authors":"Javier González de Dios , María Salomé Albi Rodríguez , Álvaro Gimeno Díaz de Atauri , Laura Cabrera Morente , Elena Pérez González , Carlos Ochoa Sangrador , Comité de Pediatría Basada en la Evidencia","doi":"10.1016/j.anpedi.2025.503941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evidence-Based Medicine relies on five structured steps: formulating a question, searching for evidence, critical appraisal of the evidence, assessing applicability and evaluating performance. While all steps are essential, critical appraisal is the central component, implemented in three stages: analyzing validity or scientific rigor (including both internal and external validity), evaluating clinical relevance or importance (considering quantitative, qualitative, comparative dimensions, and the balance of benefits, risks, and costs), and determining applicability (in routine clinical practice). Among the useful tools for critical appraisal, notable resources include templates and materials from CASPe and Osteba, as well as the epidemiological calculator Calcupedev, developed by the Committee on Evidence-Based Pediatrics.</div><div>This article explores the necessary process of critically appraising studies on prognostic and risk factors through the analysis of observational studies (cohort and case-control studies).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7783,"journal":{"name":"Anales de pediatria","volume":"103 4","pages":"Article 503941"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lectura crítica (I): Fundamentos, herramientas y su aplicación en artículos científicos sobre pronóstico y efectos perjudiciales\",\"authors\":\"Javier González de Dios , María Salomé Albi Rodríguez , Álvaro Gimeno Díaz de Atauri , Laura Cabrera Morente , Elena Pérez González , Carlos Ochoa Sangrador , Comité de Pediatría Basada en la Evidencia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anpedi.2025.503941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Evidence-Based Medicine relies on five structured steps: formulating a question, searching for evidence, critical appraisal of the evidence, assessing applicability and evaluating performance. While all steps are essential, critical appraisal is the central component, implemented in three stages: analyzing validity or scientific rigor (including both internal and external validity), evaluating clinical relevance or importance (considering quantitative, qualitative, comparative dimensions, and the balance of benefits, risks, and costs), and determining applicability (in routine clinical practice). Among the useful tools for critical appraisal, notable resources include templates and materials from CASPe and Osteba, as well as the epidemiological calculator Calcupedev, developed by the Committee on Evidence-Based Pediatrics.</div><div>This article explores the necessary process of critically appraising studies on prognostic and risk factors through the analysis of observational studies (cohort and case-control studies).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales de pediatria\",\"volume\":\"103 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 503941\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales de pediatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1695403325001766\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1695403325001766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lectura crítica (I): Fundamentos, herramientas y su aplicación en artículos científicos sobre pronóstico y efectos perjudiciales
Evidence-Based Medicine relies on five structured steps: formulating a question, searching for evidence, critical appraisal of the evidence, assessing applicability and evaluating performance. While all steps are essential, critical appraisal is the central component, implemented in three stages: analyzing validity or scientific rigor (including both internal and external validity), evaluating clinical relevance or importance (considering quantitative, qualitative, comparative dimensions, and the balance of benefits, risks, and costs), and determining applicability (in routine clinical practice). Among the useful tools for critical appraisal, notable resources include templates and materials from CASPe and Osteba, as well as the epidemiological calculator Calcupedev, developed by the Committee on Evidence-Based Pediatrics.
This article explores the necessary process of critically appraising studies on prognostic and risk factors through the analysis of observational studies (cohort and case-control studies).
期刊介绍:
La Asociación Española de Pediatría tiene como uno de sus objetivos principales la difusión de información científica rigurosa y actualizada sobre las distintas áreas de la pediatría. Anales de Pediatría es el Órgano de Expresión Científica de la Asociación y constituye el vehículo a través del cual se comunican los asociados. Publica trabajos originales sobre investigación clínica en pediatría procedentes de España y países latinoamericanos, así como artículos de revisión elaborados por los mejores profesionales de cada especialidad, las comunicaciones del congreso anual y los libros de actas de la Asociación, y guías de actuación elaboradas por las diferentes Sociedades/Secciones Especializadas integradas en la Asociación Española de Pediatría.