评论阅读(I):关于预报和有害影响的科学论文的基础、工具及其应用

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Javier González de Dios , María Salomé Albi Rodríguez , Álvaro Gimeno Díaz de Atauri , Laura Cabrera Morente , Elena Pérez González , Carlos Ochoa Sangrador , Comité de Pediatría Basada en la Evidencia
{"title":"评论阅读(I):关于预报和有害影响的科学论文的基础、工具及其应用","authors":"Javier González de Dios ,&nbsp;María Salomé Albi Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Álvaro Gimeno Díaz de Atauri ,&nbsp;Laura Cabrera Morente ,&nbsp;Elena Pérez González ,&nbsp;Carlos Ochoa Sangrador ,&nbsp;Comité de Pediatría Basada en la Evidencia","doi":"10.1016/j.anpedi.2025.503941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evidence-Based Medicine relies on five structured steps: formulating a question, searching for evidence, critical appraisal of the evidence, assessing applicability and evaluating performance. While all steps are essential, critical appraisal is the central component, implemented in three stages: analyzing validity or scientific rigor (including both internal and external validity), evaluating clinical relevance or importance (considering quantitative, qualitative, comparative dimensions, and the balance of benefits, risks, and costs), and determining applicability (in routine clinical practice). Among the useful tools for critical appraisal, notable resources include templates and materials from CASPe and Osteba, as well as the epidemiological calculator Calcupedev, developed by the Committee on Evidence-Based Pediatrics.</div><div>This article explores the necessary process of critically appraising studies on prognostic and risk factors through the analysis of observational studies (cohort and case-control studies).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7783,"journal":{"name":"Anales de pediatria","volume":"103 4","pages":"Article 503941"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lectura crítica (I): Fundamentos, herramientas y su aplicación en artículos científicos sobre pronóstico y efectos perjudiciales\",\"authors\":\"Javier González de Dios ,&nbsp;María Salomé Albi Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Álvaro Gimeno Díaz de Atauri ,&nbsp;Laura Cabrera Morente ,&nbsp;Elena Pérez González ,&nbsp;Carlos Ochoa Sangrador ,&nbsp;Comité de Pediatría Basada en la Evidencia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anpedi.2025.503941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Evidence-Based Medicine relies on five structured steps: formulating a question, searching for evidence, critical appraisal of the evidence, assessing applicability and evaluating performance. While all steps are essential, critical appraisal is the central component, implemented in three stages: analyzing validity or scientific rigor (including both internal and external validity), evaluating clinical relevance or importance (considering quantitative, qualitative, comparative dimensions, and the balance of benefits, risks, and costs), and determining applicability (in routine clinical practice). Among the useful tools for critical appraisal, notable resources include templates and materials from CASPe and Osteba, as well as the epidemiological calculator Calcupedev, developed by the Committee on Evidence-Based Pediatrics.</div><div>This article explores the necessary process of critically appraising studies on prognostic and risk factors through the analysis of observational studies (cohort and case-control studies).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales de pediatria\",\"volume\":\"103 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 503941\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales de pediatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1695403325001766\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1695403325001766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

循证医学依赖于五个结构化步骤:提出问题、寻找证据、对证据进行批判性评估、评估适用性和评估绩效。虽然所有步骤都是必不可少的,但关键评估是核心组成部分,分三个阶段实施:分析有效性或科学严谨性(包括内部和外部有效性),评估临床相关性或重要性(考虑定量、定性、比较维度,以及利益、风险和成本的平衡),以及确定适用性(在常规临床实践中)。在批判性评估的有用工具中,值得注意的资源包括来自CASPe和Osteba的模板和材料,以及由循证儿科委员会开发的流行病学计算器Calcupedev。本文通过对观察性研究(队列研究和病例对照研究)的分析,探讨了对预后和风险因素研究进行批判性评估的必要过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lectura crítica (I): Fundamentos, herramientas y su aplicación en artículos científicos sobre pronóstico y efectos perjudiciales
Evidence-Based Medicine relies on five structured steps: formulating a question, searching for evidence, critical appraisal of the evidence, assessing applicability and evaluating performance. While all steps are essential, critical appraisal is the central component, implemented in three stages: analyzing validity or scientific rigor (including both internal and external validity), evaluating clinical relevance or importance (considering quantitative, qualitative, comparative dimensions, and the balance of benefits, risks, and costs), and determining applicability (in routine clinical practice). Among the useful tools for critical appraisal, notable resources include templates and materials from CASPe and Osteba, as well as the epidemiological calculator Calcupedev, developed by the Committee on Evidence-Based Pediatrics.
This article explores the necessary process of critically appraising studies on prognostic and risk factors through the analysis of observational studies (cohort and case-control studies).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anales de pediatria
Anales de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
155
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: La Asociación Española de Pediatría tiene como uno de sus objetivos principales la difusión de información científica rigurosa y actualizada sobre las distintas áreas de la pediatría. Anales de Pediatría es el Órgano de Expresión Científica de la Asociación y constituye el vehículo a través del cual se comunican los asociados. Publica trabajos originales sobre investigación clínica en pediatría procedentes de España y países latinoamericanos, así como artículos de revisión elaborados por los mejores profesionales de cada especialidad, las comunicaciones del congreso anual y los libros de actas de la Asociación, y guías de actuación elaboradas por las diferentes Sociedades/Secciones Especializadas integradas en la Asociación Española de Pediatría.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信